Posted on 09/05/2004 5:10:32 PM PDT by Leroy S. Mort
WASHINGTON (AP) - A former Senate Intelligence Committee chairman asserted Sunday that the general who ran the war in Afghanistan said more than a year before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq that his resources were being shifted in preparation for taking on Saddam Hussein.
Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., contends that just months into combat in Afghanistan, Gen. Tommy Franks also told him that fighting terrorism in Somalia, Yemen and elsewhere should take priority over invading Iraq.
Graham said Franks told him he thought the United States knew less about the situation in Iraq than did some European governments, and the Bush administration should ask them for advice.
The senator, who is retiring at year's end, said his conversation with the now-retired general came in February 2002, when Graham was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
That was the month that Secretary of State Colin Powell told a House committee that President Bush was considering ``the most serious set of options one might imagine'' to bring ``regime change'' in Iraq, including the possibility of doing it alone. At least one European leader, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder, said a few days later that Bush had assured him ``he harbors no attack plans.''
The invasion began March 19, 2003, over the vigorous protests of Germany and most other major U.S. allies except Britain, which joined the invading force. Graham opposed the war.
Graham said on NBC's ``Meet the Press'' that his meeting with Franks was at the general's headquarters, Central Command in Tampa, Fla.
``He laid out a very precise strategy for fighting the war on terror,'' Graham said.
``First, we should win the war in Afghanistan. Second, move to Somalia, which as he described was almost anarchy but with a substantial number of al-Qaida cells; then to Yemen. And that we should be very careful about Iraq, because our intelligence was so weak that we didn't know what we were getting into,'' Graham said.
Last week, Franks gave fellow Texan Bush a rousing endorsement in a speech at the Republican National Convention. Franks said he had seen in Bush's eyes ``the courage to stand up to terrorists and the consistency necessary to beat them.''
In ``American Soldier,'' Franks' memoirs published last month, he mentioned none of the points Graham reported in his book. The retired general could not be reached Sunday. There was no immediate response to a message left at Tampa's Central Command headquarters.
Graham wrote of his meeting with Franks in a book, ``Intelligence Matters,'' which goes on sale Tuesday.
In an excerpt read on the program, the senator said Franks told him ``his men and resources were being moved to Iraq, where he felt that our intelligence was shoddy. This admission was coming almost 14 months before the beginning of combat operations in Iraq and only five months after the commencement of combat in Afghanistan.''
Graham's book also discusses apparent financial ties of Saudi officials with two of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
Graham said the matter was discussed in a 28-page section of the committee's report on the attacks that was kept secret at the request of the White House.
The Associated Press reported in August 2003 that the classified part of the report examined interactions between Saudi businessmen and the royal family that may have intentionally or unwittingly aided al-Qaida or the suicide hijackers.
He should have called the book "Intelligence Missing" as in his own...
He should have called the book "Intelligence Missing" as in his own...
Since he writes his every thought in a book every day, I would like to see the entry for the day he had that conversation with General Franks before I'd believe it.
This is the Senator who documents his poops in writing, isn't it?
> Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., contends that ...
It looks like Graham got FUD duty this weekend.
Assume this is B.S.
_________________________
FUD: Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt
(usually content-free)
Is there something WRONG with that?
Let's see....A Rat opens his mouth and crap comes out. Sounds like more of the same from the left.
I'll be interested to see if General Franks has anything to say about this.
I thought that the military as a rule studied and planned for any contingency,like they did for Japan for years before anyone had a remote idea that we'd ever be at war with them. What would be so strange about having studied the possibility of war in Iraq,considering the fact that Saddam for a decade refused to cooperate with the UN(snicker),and that we'd already been there once to kick them out of Kuwait?
Any loon can write a book.
This loon got his published.
http://www.s-t.com/daily/07-00/07-16-00/a06op024.htm.
I guess you can't blame him for being slapdash? Zzzzzz...
Yeah, just like my good buddies, Richard Clarke and Joe Wilson testfied. Also my sister, Morgan Fairchild.....
Dueling books: Graham vs Franks.
[I think I would go with General Franks' version.]
Graham the Senate Intelligence Committee chairman. Graham, intelligence. It would be funny if it didn't explain 9/11. The there is Kerry, also on the Senate Intelligence Committee, only he never went.
Looks like "I Passed A Soft One Today"Graham is doing some mutual cover for Kerry.
Hey Dummy we are at War and your disclosures of undocumented fact are just another spin that the MSM will report as proven fact. /barfing!
Graham's version sounds about right. Franks has always impressed me. I doubt if he was snookered too much by the neocons and their theories for going into Iraq. He did have the good judgement to retire before getting bogged down in the post-war problems. It sounds reasonable that Somalia was a hot bed of Al Qaeda because Bin Laden spent considerable time there.
Here is a guy doing Sunday talk shows to shill his book when his home state is being wiped out by a hurricane. I wonder who comes first, his career or his constituency?
Exactly. :o)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.