1 posted on
09/03/2004 9:47:56 PM PDT by
alydar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: alydar
"Bush used to be a drunk"
Yeah, that'll win the election for them.
File this under 'bottom of the barrel, scraping'.
2 posted on
09/03/2004 9:49:43 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(Senator Kerry is all rice, no shrapnel.)
To: alydar
You've got to be kidding. How did Raines get this job? This was the only paper that actually printed true stories about Bill Clinton (when he was President) that the US papers ignored.
To: alydar
Yawn...
5 Legislative Days Left Until The AWB Expires
5 posted on
09/03/2004 9:51:27 PM PDT by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: alydar
The Guardian (which used to be named The Manchester Guardian before it went national) has historically been the liberal newspaper of record in the UK, much as the NY Times is in the US.
8 posted on
09/03/2004 9:52:41 PM PDT by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: alydar
George Jr sent out of Texas by father as a 'drunken liability'But look at him now!
10 posted on
09/03/2004 9:56:36 PM PDT by
lewislynn
(Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
To: alydar
"Bush used to be a drunk"
Well, Kendedy IS a drunk.
To: alydar
I got all that crud in a giddy e-mail from a lib friend today -- 20 pages of it -- it was just incoherent rambling from one bitter woman--totally unsubstantiated by anything and nothing new.
13 posted on
09/03/2004 9:58:49 PM PDT by
altura
(Didn't think it possible but the dems did it. --found someone worse than Clinton or Gore.)
To: alydar
I assume the Guardian has never heard the story of the Prodigal Son? Too bad.
14 posted on
09/03/2004 10:01:22 PM PDT by
marvlus
To: alydar
I have noticed a new viciousness by both the Telegraph and the Guardian lately towards W and Republicans. Actually, they sound like little 12 year old girls gossiping.
I guess they figure we won't notice. HAHAHA!
15 posted on
09/03/2004 10:02:53 PM PDT by
NavySEAL F-16
(Proud to be a Reagan Republican)
To: alydar
Al Guardian is global HQ for the Hate America Cult, with a non-stop message of demonization, insult, and distortion for its dwindling audience of middle-class chatterati and Islamofascist immigrant.
20 posted on
09/03/2004 10:15:01 PM PDT by
atomic conspiracy
(Anti-war Movement: Roadkill on the Highway to Freedom)
To: alydar
I remeber 4 years ago there was "shocking" video of Bush drunk, and it turned out to be a wedding video (you know where the camera goes around the room and people say stupid stuff) and he had, OMG, a
drink in his hand.
The drinking demons were already pulled last election. Won't wash this one. They need a new sin.
23 posted on
09/03/2004 10:18:17 PM PDT by
Jalapeno
To: alydar
To: alydar
"KLINTON SOLD CHINA SECRETS TO SUPPORT HIS COCAINE HABIT"--How's that?
28 posted on
09/03/2004 10:23:58 PM PDT by
longfellow
(You're either with US or from Hollywood! Ultimateamerican.com)
To: alydar
You notice this woman did not tell her story until her husband died. So the man that Bush 41 supposedly spoke to cannot confirm or deny the story. Same with the story about how 43 got in the National Guard...the 'family friend' who supposedly made the request has recently passed away and can no longer deny the story. These stories are merely hearsay. Besides, unlike Kerry, Bush is not running on his Vietnam era record.
To: alydar
The reason GWB's drunken episodes will never be a problem, he's already made them known to the public.
I've often heard him speak of his abuses of alcohol, even when speaking to guys at half-way houses, etc.
30 posted on
09/03/2004 10:41:58 PM PDT by
dawn53
To: alydar
This may be annoying but will not change any votes because Bush as a reformed heavy drinker is already well-known and discounted even if the details are obscure. Dragging this up now is the press equivalent of little leaguers heckling a batter: it can be a distraction, but only if the batter lets it affect him.
On the fundamentals, Bush will win or lose based primarily on two things: his performance in office, especially as to jobs and the economy; and whether Kerry is plausible as a better choice. Both of these factors weigh against Kerry.
To: alydar
Tired old news. And isn't it better to have a SOBER person in the White House, than a whiny, wine-soaked liberal?
To: alydar
Let me see if I get this straight
1) George H.W. Bush is ambassador to the U.N.
2) X41 calls up a pal in Alabama, tells his friend that his son is a drunk, and asks him to hire the drunk for his political campaign, nonetheless.
3) Even though x41 is Ambassador to the U.N. in New York, he cares whether 43 is in Texas or Alabama. In Texas, 43 will embarrass Bush. But the states of Louisiana and Mississipi somehow insulate the U.N. ambassador from the U.S. from any embarrassment.
4) And his friend hires 43 for his political campaign, even though he's been told that 43 is a drunk that could embarrass him.
This stupid Kerry-planted story makes no sense.
To: alydar; All
Just send 'em back this pic, will you please? Thanks!
39 posted on
09/04/2004 12:52:12 AM PDT by
Seadog Bytes
(OPM* -- The Liberal solution to ALL of America's problems. (*...Other People's Money.))
To: alydar
I cannot believe that anyone with an IQ of 80 and higher believes that stories like this are going to hurt President Bush.
Liberals have reached a level of desperation that is beyond comprehension.
41 posted on
09/04/2004 9:18:30 PM PDT by
jveritas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson