Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Detectives testing residents' guns (Beach killing in CA)
THE PRESS DEMOCRAT ^ | Friday, September 3, 2004 | DEREK J. MOORE

Posted on 09/03/2004 9:03:10 AM PDT by Doomonyou

Detectives testing residents' guns

2 Bodega Bay men voluntarily help investigators in Jenner killings, say rights violated

Friday, September 3, 2004

By DEREK J. MOORE

THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

Detectives investigating the slayings of two young campers on a Jenner beach have visited the homes of at least two Sonoma County residents this week, seeking permission to test their handguns.

Sheriff's officials wouldn't discuss why the people were contacted, but a Bodega Bay man said he voluntarily handed over two guns.

Bruce, who asked that only his first name be used, wouldn't divulge the make or caliber of the weapons, saying detectives asked him not to reveal that information.

He said he cooperated with investigators because he wants the killings of Jason Allen and Lindsay Cutshall to be solved. But he also believes that he was unfairly questioned simply for being listed in government records on gun owners.

He said other than a drunken driving conviction in 1990 he has no criminal record.

"If this is going to help them, great," he said. "But while they're in here, they're asking, 'Hey, you got anything illegal we need to know about? No, except for the meth lab in my bathroom.' C'mon guys. This is a fishing expedition."

Sheriff's investigators have said they're chasing hundreds of leads but haven't identified a suspect or a motive in the slayings. They also have said they haven't found the firearm used to kill Allen and Cutshall, youth camp counselors whose bodies were found Aug. 18 by sheriff's deputies.

Bruce is one of two men from Bodega Bay who said two detectives showed up at their homes unannounced this week to inquire about guns the men own. They said the detectives asked if they could come inside to make sure the weapons were "safe and accounted for."

Both men said they were then interviewed about the Jenner case for more than an hour. Bruce said he was asked if he had been in Jenner recently and was asked for personal details about his family and friends.

He said detectives told him they wanted the guns for ballistic testing.

He said he fears his neighbors will learn that he has the firearms, which he said were obtained legally and stored in a secure place.

"I'm not the kind of person to advertise I have guns," he said.

The other man whose guns were taken said he, too, feels like his rights were violated.

"This is the kind of stuff that makes gun owners jump up and down," said the man, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "It's like having the Wehrmacht knock on your door."

Investigators have acknowledged contacting at least one other gun owner.

Sheriff's officials confirmed at a news conference last week that they had checked on another man's weapons, but they didn't identify him or say whether that information proved useful.

Sheriff's Lt. Roger Rude wouldn't say how detectives identified the men or why they were interviewed, saying investigators want to protect the "sanctity of the investigation."

But he said detectives acted properly and that not all Sonoma County gun owners are suddenly under suspicion, though he acknowledged that more people would be contacted.

"I do not believe that we have been exploiting a database in order to check everybody in the world that has a gun," he said. "I think folks are barking up the wrong tree there."

It's a long-standing law enforcement technique to knock on doors to try to find weapons used in a crime when other evidence, such as recovered bullet fragments, points to a certain kind of gun.

That's particularly true in cases such as the Jenner homicides when other evidence apparently is lacking.

Bullets or bullet fragments found at the crime scene could help detectives determine the type of weapon used or in some cases even identify its owner.

"All guns have a different ballistic signature," said Hugh Wilson, a former Marin County sheriff's detective and an associate professor in the criminal justice department at California State University, Sacramento. "The Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms has a large database to check recovered rounds from a crime scene to ultimately narrow the gun (used)."

He said the fact that sheriff's detectives are contacting Sonoma County gun owners likely means they have recovered enough evidence to determine the type of weapon used to kill Allen and Cutshall.

"They're checking everyone who owns a gun like this in Sonoma County," he said. "They're going to assign detectives in the morning to follow up the leads. It's a very exhaustive process, but when you don't have a lot of other good things to go on, you've got to eliminate that."

Wilson said he and his colleagues banged on a lot of Bay Area doors in the late 1970s and early '80s while searching for the gun used by the infamous Trailside Killer.

The gun was eventually recovered - in the possession of David Carpenter, who was convicted of the killings.

"This is very labor intensive, but in a case like (Jenner) they're going to pull out all the stops," he said. "You can bet that type of thing is going on if they've got ballistics evidence, and it sounds like they do. That's lead No. 1."

He said there is nothing illegal about using gun registry information in a criminal investigation, and that detectives don't need a search warrant unless they are denied entry or a person refuses to answer questions.

The information used in such cases can be obtained through the state Department of Justice, which keeps a record of all gun purchases made through licensed dealers in California. The information can be cross-checked with criminal records and other data from background checks that must be conducted when anyone buys a firearm, said Hallye Jordan, a Justice Department spokeswoman.

She said law enforcement agencies can access this information through a variety of state and federal databases, including the Automated Firearm System, which includes records of guns that are purchased as well as those that are booked as evidence or reported lost or stolen.

The databases aren't available to the general public, she said.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; governmentgunlists; jasonallen; lindsaycutshall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
Gee, I thought they said there was no database.
1 posted on 09/03/2004 9:03:12 AM PDT by Doomonyou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

I can't recall when any of these mass fishing expeditions ever solved a crime. They tried it in the malvo case, and they were barking up the wrong tree.


2 posted on 09/03/2004 9:07:43 AM PDT by flashbunny (Kerry helped move jobs to china - http://www.flashbunny.org/commentary/kerryoutsourced.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

---The information used in such cases can be obtained through the state Department of Justice, which keeps a record of all gun purchases made through licensed dealers in California. The information can be cross-checked with criminal records and other data from background checks that must be conducted when anyone buys a firearm, said Hallye Jordan, a Justice Department spokeswoman.---

Swell.


3 posted on 09/03/2004 9:07:56 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

People in Bodega Bay have handguns! That is news.


4 posted on 09/03/2004 9:10:29 AM PDT by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

At least we'll all still have spitballs when their done.


5 posted on 09/03/2004 9:11:05 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: claudiustg

I get a real warm and fuzzy feeling thinking about John Kerry, Hillary, et al getting in power and having that information.


6 posted on 09/03/2004 9:11:07 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Born to Conserve

They're


7 posted on 09/03/2004 9:12:00 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
can't recall when any of these mass fishing expeditions ever solved a crime. They tried it in the malvo case, and they were barking up the wrong tree.

Sure it did. It helped catch the two white guys that did it.

8 posted on 09/03/2004 9:12:29 AM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Not Fonda Kerry in '04 // Vets Against Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GSWarrior
People in Bodega Bay have handguns!

And Rifles too! This place is crawling with Blacktail.

9 posted on 09/03/2004 9:14:24 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

BTTT


10 posted on 09/03/2004 9:15:58 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
ALL YOUR GUNS ARE BELONG TO US
11 posted on 09/03/2004 9:17:36 AM PDT by Viet-Boat-Rider (((KERRY IS A NARCISSISTIC LIAR, GOLDBRICKER, AND TRAITOR!)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
"Lists? What lists?"

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

12 posted on 09/03/2004 9:21:28 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Squantos; Eaker; Mulder; coloradan; yarddog
He said there is nothing illegal about using gun registry information in a criminal investigation, and that detectives don't need a search warrant unless they are denied entry or a person refuses to answer questions.
13 posted on 09/03/2004 9:25:32 AM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Round up the usual suspects.


14 posted on 09/03/2004 9:36:16 AM PDT by TERMINATTOR (Don't blame me - I voted for McClintock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I am not familiar with California law so it might be legal there to use their own records.

It sounds like a fishing expedition to me, but in a few instances fishing expeditions might be ok as long as they are fishing in a very small pond, not the entire ocean.

Of course the ones to really check on are those who refuse to have their guns checked.

Cops use the "rock soup" method all the time to create an excuse for a search.

15 posted on 09/03/2004 9:36:29 AM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
I get a real warm and fuzzy feeling thinking about John Kerry, Hillary, et al getting in power and having that information.

No worries. John Kerry says he supports the 2nd Amendment. He goes fowling, don't you know (fortunately, he doesn't need a 30/30 for that).

16 posted on 09/03/2004 9:37:06 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Yes, these guys have learned quite well from the statist playbook. They get you coming or going, while they're working on adding new chapters.

Maybe something you can work into your second novel.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

17 posted on 09/03/2004 9:40:46 AM PDT by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou

In Montana the average houshold contains 7 guns I'm told.

Go fish! :^)

Also it's legal to drive around with a loaded gun in your vehicle and half the population does during hunting season.


18 posted on 09/03/2004 9:42:32 AM PDT by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RogueIsland
John Kerry says he supports the 2nd Amendment.

And next week he wont support it.

According to Kerry and his ilk: "Guns for me and none for thee."

19 posted on 09/03/2004 9:43:01 AM PDT by Doomonyou (Molon Labe! FMCDH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Doomonyou
"I do not believe that we have been exploiting a database in order to check everybody in the world that has a gun," he said.

No, the are just using it to find guns of the right caliber and make.

20 posted on 09/03/2004 9:43:21 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson