Skip to comments.
Taliban Pat Buchanan on with Michael Medved This Hour (With streaming-audio link)
KRLA ^
| August 30, 2004
Posted on 08/30/2004 12:13:04 PM PDT by quidnunc
Listen via KRLA in Los Angeles.
http://www2.krla870.com/listen/
TOPICS: Announcements; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Extended News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: aliens; antisemitepat; besttalkshowhost; buchanan; demagogicparty; kenyanbornmuzzie; lookwhohatesjews; medved; whatshisfrnick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-155 next last
To: quidnunc
Take care and again, thanks for the post. It's always great to be able to hear pat make a clown out of himself. It only serves to remind me how his whole America first thing was nothing but marketing.
See you later...and don't make the Patsies cry (too much).
To: zbigreddogz
I lost the last shred of respect I had for him in 2000 when he tried to argue that some of the votes for him in Florida should have went to Gore.
Me too. There is a time for keeping your mouth shut. The only argument he could muster appeared to be that that many Jews couldn't have voted for him. Well, it was a strange argument, to say the least...
To: quidnunc
Pat Buchanan is a great patriotic American. His words will one day prove to have been prophetic.
103
posted on
08/30/2004 3:29:05 PM PDT
by
Smocker
To: Smocker
"Pat Buchanan is a great patriotic American. His words will one day prove to have been prophetic. "Well said. And Pat is off to a good start in saying our one-sided trade agreements will cost jobs, illegal immigration is bad for America, as is abortion, homosexual practices, World Robocop entanglements and the Swiftboat Vets will down Kerry. He is right. That is why opponents are reduced to calling him smear names.
104
posted on
08/30/2004 3:36:26 PM PDT
by
ex-snook
("BUT ABOVE ALL THINGS, TRUTH BEARETH AWAY THE VICTORY")
To: George W. Bush
There's a time to let THE FREAKING CONSTITUTION decide. It doesn't say anything about guessing who voters 'intended' to vote for. It says count who they actually voted for. In his quest for vengence, he tried to sell out his old party, and the Constitution of the United States.
He's about as low as you can get as far as I am concerned.
And it IS interesting that he thought Jews wouldn't vote for him. It lends credibility to the belief that he is an anti-semite.
To: Williams
Bush doesn't want coverage of the river boat guys to screw up his own message. That's all. There is no difference between them.
106
posted on
08/30/2004 3:40:02 PM PDT
by
BobS
To: George W. Bush
The only argument he could muster appeared to be that that many Jews couldn't have voted for him. Well, it was a strange argument, to say the least.Even the notoriously dishonest Pat is further along the road towards acknowledging the ugly truth about himself than are his apologists, t'would seem. :)
107
posted on
08/30/2004 3:53:58 PM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: zbigreddogz
"He thought jews wouldn't vote for him. lends credibility to the beleif he is an anti-semite" You nailed it man! Every Republican politician is therefor most likely an anti-semite. Thanks to nuggets like yours,Pat Buchanan threads are always informative.
To: CWOJackson
Yes, I read it. Amazing how pat doesn't feel that 3,000 of our people killed here, at home, by Islamic Extremists, who he doesn't consider to be a threat to the United States, is much...yet he tried to make an issue over the thousands of body bags which were going to be pouring home from the new Vietnam.He's right, 3,000 dead Americans isn't all that many. And the survival of Israel is no more significant to America than the survival of Poland to England, per Neville Buchanan.
109
posted on
08/30/2004 4:05:33 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(Pat Buchanan, “The Skunk at the Garden Party”, Michael Medved on Pat at the Republican Convention)
To: nkycincinnatikid
Try and spin what I said however you want. It won't change the fact that he's a palisinian sympathizer and an anti-semite.
To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Buckley had it right, a long time ago ago. Of course, like most media types, Pat does have comments on both sides of the Jewish issue (odd Pat concerns himself with a Jewish issue). Rather Kerryesque.
111
posted on
08/30/2004 4:08:06 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(Pat Buchanan, “The Skunk at the Garden Party”, Michael Medved on Pat at the Republican Convention)
To: George W. Bush
The only argument he could muster appeared to be that that many Jews couldn't have voted for him. Well, it was a strange argument, to say the least... He's probably right. After all, if they're smart enough to take over the government, they're smart enought to read a ballot :>)
112
posted on
08/30/2004 4:09:39 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(Pat Buchanan, “The Skunk at the Garden Party”, Michael Medved on Pat at the Republican Convention)
To: ex-snook
Well said. And Pat is off to a good start in saying our one-sided trade agreements will cost jobs, illegal immigration is bad for America, as is abortion, homosexual practices, World Robocop entanglements and the Swiftboat Vets will down Kerry. He is right. That is why opponents are reduced to calling him smear names. Right, he's the only guy who thinks of these things. Republicans need to embrace him, like they need to embrace David Duke. He has supporters after all.
113
posted on
08/30/2004 4:11:39 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(Pat Buchanan, “The Skunk at the Garden Party”, Michael Medved on Pat at the Republican Convention)
To: kevao
Satisfied?
Well then I am sure you would be quite put out if somebody made the stupid remark you made about Buchanan's uncles if they did that to yours
So I will be satisfied when you retract it
114
posted on
08/30/2004 4:14:56 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: SJackson
LOL! I see the Patsies sulked off into the night. It must get awfully demoralizing for them trying to support that clown.
To: uncbob
Well then I am sure you would be quite put out if somebody made the stupid remark you made about Buchanan's uncles if they did that to yoursSo I will be satisfied when you retract it
Retract it? No way. It's a good joke. I LOL'ed when I first heard it, because it has a basis in fact -- Pat's anti-Semitism.
You don't think Pat is anti-Semitic; I do. Thus, you don't find the joke funny; I do.
Pat was my first Conservative hero when I was a youngster (well, second, next to WFB). I still love Pat personally, and still agree with much of what he says. However, I don't go along with his protectionist views. And, I do hate to say it, he's anti-Semitic.
I must say, he has been especially awesome lately with his support of the Swifties. Go Pat!
And go Israel, too! ;-)
116
posted on
08/30/2004 5:23:52 PM PDT
by
kevao
To: SJackson
Why?
Does "Zionist" means Jew:? Then why the separate name? Isn't it perhaps because there are zionists who are not Jewish. Is that not so? Those who might be Evangelical Christians? Or maybe even catholics? They are zionists also. So why would you say Anti-zionist means Anti-semitic? __
Perhaps you are just using that left wing (neo-con?) tactic of suggesting any disagreement with your particular ideology indicates some latent racism on behalf of the person questionng you...
117
posted on
08/30/2004 6:12:11 PM PDT
by
jd777
To: jd777
Why?...Does "Zionist" means Jew:? Then why the separate name? Isn't it perhaps because there are zionists who are not Jewish. Is that not so? Those who might be Evangelical Christians? Or maybe even catholics? They are zionists also. So why would you say Anti-zionist means Anti-semitic?...Perhaps you are just using that left wing (neo-con?) tactic of suggesting any disagreement with your particular ideology indicates some latent racism on behalf of the person questionng you... Why what? I haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. Next time, reference the post
On the off chance that addressing the earlier posts about Zionism and antisemitism, pull out your Ouija board and ask Martin Luther King, they're his words, not mine, though I don't disagree. You're the first to accuse MLK of being a one of the left wing neocons, at least that I've seen.
118
posted on
08/30/2004 6:20:37 PM PDT
by
SJackson
(Pat Buchanan, “The Skunk at the Garden Party”, Michael Medved on Pat at the Republican Convention)
Comment #119 Removed by Moderator
To: akronian
akronian wrote:
So are saying that the neocons are primarily Jewish?Some of them are, but most aren't. < P>But because a number of prominent neocons such as Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and the Kristos are Jewish, the term "neocon" has become for paleocons and liberals code for Jews.
120
posted on
08/30/2004 6:47:02 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-155 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson