Posted on 08/28/2004 6:49:37 PM PDT by NewRomeTacitus
I say we hire some unsuspecting PETA pigeons and have them start a "Save the Mountain Lion and Bear" campaign along the border.
That will put them to practical use.
Yes, they should take note, but probably won't. They would rather forget that 9/11 ever happened. It can't and should not be forgotten
Yes, 250,000 of them plan to invade Central Park in NYC.
We were in Oregon a few weeks ago and noticed the whole place was crawling with illegal aliens. What a difference 4 years makes.
They believe that if they allow the Republican Party to win the Presidency with a candidate that ignores the wishes of the overwhelming majority of American Citizen's, in respect to illegal immigration, border security, interior immigration enforcement and out-of-control legal immigration, yet again, that's the only otherwise Conservative Republican candidate that they'll ever get from the new, 'Big Tent', Republican Party.
That list of Conservatives is growing.
They'll vote for Republican candidates for congress, but not for president this November.
They'd prefer gridlock and sending a message to the Republican Party as opposed to 4 more years of total capitulation to the pro-illegal immigration, open borders, one-worlders.
I agree and I'm not a "DU TROLL" or any other name you or anyone else cares to call me, itsahoot.
I'm doubtful that continued derision, personal attacks, name-calling or other abuse will change the opinion of a single Conservative that's anti-illegal immigration and anti-open borders.
I know that there are many here that will redouble their efforts to insult us just the same. It won't work, but hey, whatever floats your boats.
For myself, I'd rather have 4 years of gridlock and another potential Conservative Republican revolution.
I believe that there are many Republican members of congress that are anti-illegal immigration and anti-open borders, but they're hesitant to say anything out of fear of receiving the same treatment Tom Tancredo's getting from Rove and the Republican Party leadership.
A majority of Republicans in congress and some Democrats will resist Kerry's efforts to grant a 'blanket' or not so blanket' amnesty, while these same Republicans will 'rubber-stamp' anything Bush wants.
IMO, if Kerry is elected and the Republicans maintain a majority in congress, they'll fight Kerry 'tooth and nail' the same as they fought the Clintons.
Conversely, IMO, if the Republicans win both the congress and the presidency, Bush's plan is a done deal.
That's unacceptable to me.
What's your opinion?
Not wishing anything bad on the residents of that city, should the terrorists unleash a weapon that's highly contaminating we'd all be better off if it happened in the gambling capital.
Because what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas.
Indeed? How'd you know they were illegals? Were they wearing sandwich boards? Stickers that read "HI! MY NAME IS (name scrawled in blank space) AND I'M AN ILLEGAL ALIEN"!? Taco residue on their hands? What gave it away for you?
Very cute indeed, but sarcasm and burying ones head in the sand does nothing to help solve this growing problem.
I quess having any kind of border policy other then anything goes is just out of the question huh? G*d forbit we suffer another large attack, but if we do and it is shown that the terrorest or their supplies crossed our "open border", the open border crowd will be in bigger trouble then they are today. The anger over our illegal immigrant policy, or lack thereof, is boiling just under the surface, an other attack might very well cause that anger to blow.
not sure where I said to inspect granny but not the Arabs...
No need to start a new party. There's already the Constitution Party, a party resembling the now-defunct, what-used-to-be Republican party, the party that has turned its back on its conservative supporters.
Is everyone in Arkansas as ignorant as you are?
Unfortunately a third party, even one a good as the constitutional party is not an option, not in this election anyway. To many judges to appoint and we can't let kerry appoint them.
All true. On the Nazi issue, though, Islam seems to be the latest target of neo-Naziism. Not that the enemy of my enemy is necessarily my friend, but every now and then you can sit back and watch as two evils destroy each other and spare you the trouble.
What do you like the most or what gives you the greatest concerns, ES?
your quote: "Does ethnicity prove anything?" is obviously the mantra of the Homeland Security airport-security nobs who watch, VERY carefully, Anglo-Saxon grannies and nursing mothers at airports rather than Arabs.
Let me help you with this: there were ZERO, zip, nada, Anglo-Saxon grannies piloting aircraft into the World Trade Center.
OTOH, there were 20 or so Arab males who were actively involved.
Ethnicity in and of itself does not prove anything. But prudence dictates that CERTAIN ethnics are deserving of more scrutiny than others.
That's called 'discrimination.' Get used to the concept--I discriminate all the time about where I go with my children, and about with whom they associate.
It's a GOOD thing to discriminate.
Are all xenophobes as paranoid as you seem to be?
Yes, I have read the Constitution Party's platform in detail. It details a return to the principles of our founders, nothing wrong with that. It would piss off bureaucrats and fat cats and those who illegally profit from us, nothing wrong with that. It would restore our rights as citizens. I like it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.