That's confirmation I've been waiting for a long time. Don't know how reliable the source is, but the terrorism involved with that crash seemed about as obvious as the double Russian crashes the other day.
Bookmark
The logical question ... was this guy onboard?
There will be hundreds of evenets which will remain classified for a very long time!
I have always felt that the government covered that incident up because the public was still reeling from the 9/11 horror and the airline industry lobbyists were in a panic.
Agencies can only cover up so much terrorism before the public gets wise and stops believing in their government. I wish we'd learn the truth about this and OKC--which I also believe was never fully explained...
The WORLD has AQ 'terrorists'.............AQanadia has....AQ Operatives.....that's .....queer...
/sarcasm
Wonder if he missed his flight like mousouie? (sp)
Me, too. Everyone wanted to hand me a tinfoil hat at the time. (But maybe I should hold onto it awhile, in case this turns out to be a bogus claim.)
But, how did he get explosives into the tail fin? Unexplained.
The point being, vertical fins don't just "fall off" A300 jets, or they'd be falling out of the sky right and left.
Any cover to stop hysteria [or the government from appearing impotent]
>>Don't know how reliable the source is, but the terrorism involved with that crash seemed about as obvious as the double Russian crashes the other day.<<
I thought that was just a wierd coincidence?
</sarcasm>
I twould be hard for him to smuggle a bomb aboard and blow up the plane since he wasn't even on board.
Final passenger list:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/a300crash/story/0,11165,592701,00.html