Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS John F. Kennedy Commanding Officer Relieved
US Navy News ^ | 26 august 2004

Posted on 08/26/2004 4:04:49 PM PDT by csvset

USS John F. Kennedy Commanding Officer Relieved
Story Number: NNS040826-06

Release Date: 8/26/2004 3:21:00 PM

Top News Story - Editors should consider using these stories first in local publications.

From Coalition Forces Maritime Component Commander/Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet Public Affairs

MANAMA, Bahrain (NNS) -- Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet has directed that the commanding officer of USS John F. Kennedy (CV 67) be relieved Aug. 27, as a result of a collision that occurred between a dhow and Kennedy during the night of July 22.

Capt. John W. Miller, former commanding officer of USS Constellation (CV 64), will replace Capt. Stephen G. Squires in command. Squires will be temporarily reassigned to duties in the United States.

The collision occurred as Kennedy was conducting flight operations in the Arabian Gulf. The decision to relieve the commanding officer followed review of an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the collision.

John F. Kennedy is deployed to the Arabian Gulf supporting coalition forces in Iraq and providing security for vital sea lines of communication in the region.


For related news, visit the Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command/Commander, U.S. 5th Fleet Navy NewsStand page at www.news.navy.mil/local/cusnc.

E-mail this story to a friend | Send a comment about this story


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: usn; ussjohnfkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last
Done in by a dhow.
1 posted on 08/26/2004 4:04:49 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: csvset

I was wondering how a dhow got close enough to an aircraft carrier to have a collision. Guess the Navy wasn't pleased.


2 posted on 08/26/2004 4:08:00 PM PDT by EternalHope (Boycott everything French forever. Including their vassal nations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset
Done in by a dhow.

I know what you mean. I suspect it was more than just the dhow.

3 posted on 08/26/2004 4:09:23 PM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset

There goes the Dhow Jones!


4 posted on 08/26/2004 4:09:36 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalHope

Question for the Navy Freepers here..A carrier, coducting operations, is part of a battle group..scrfeened with cruisers and frigates..and which is commanded by an admiral..who is ultimatelymresponsible for the deployment of the ships...large batt;e units have a screen commander, right..So..what gives?


5 posted on 08/26/2004 4:10:26 PM PDT by ken5050 (Bill Clinton has just signed to be the national spokesman for Hummer..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: csvset

Dhow!


6 posted on 08/26/2004 4:11:02 PM PDT by Vision ("This is in God's hands now")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset
result of a collision that occurred between a dhow and Kennedy during the night of July 22.

He might as well retire, his career is over.

7 posted on 08/26/2004 4:11:14 PM PDT by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; Squantos; cva66snipe
Ouch...what you might call a real career debilitator.

Lots more to this story I'll bet.

8 posted on 08/26/2004 4:11:17 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: csvset
An explosive dhow would have been troublesome to say the least.



9 posted on 08/26/2004 4:12:56 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Each ship captain is responsible for his ship, regardless if an Admiral is commanding the taskforce.

I a US Navy ship hits ANYTHING, another ship, a pier, anything, the captain is immediately removed, and don't be looking for a promotion anytime soon.

10 posted on 08/26/2004 4:14:20 PM PDT by Viet-Boat-Rider ((KERRY IS A NARCISSISTIC LIAR, GOLDBRICKER, AND TRAITOR!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Viet-Boat-Rider

Yep...like I said, a real career debilitator.


11 posted on 08/26/2004 4:15:28 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

It must have been a stealth dhow.


12 posted on 08/26/2004 4:16:30 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: csvset

DHOW!

13 posted on 08/26/2004 4:16:40 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

What gives is that a lot of people screwed up and were not sufficiently vigilant. Having been on a warship that protected the JFK for 9 months in the early '70s, I cannot fathom (pun intended) how such could be the case. More brass-hatted heads should roll, IMO.....


14 posted on 08/26/2004 4:17:02 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: csvset; Poohbah; hchutch; Pukin Dog; All
Navy FReeper here. Big John has a VERY jinxed rep in the Navy. This is its THIRD skipper to be relieved in the last four years. At one point in 2002, she was in such bad condition that she couldn't even fire her boilers, nor move her elevators. Her skipper then claimed he's had "no idea" that she was in such condition, after serving as her commander for 10 months prior. She BARELY made this deployment.

JFK really needs to be decommisioned...she's old, worn-out, and all around bad news.

NO small craft is supposed to get within miles of a carrier, EVER. However, few of us squids were surprised to find out that, since one DID, it was Big John.

Google a bit...the ship's troubles with commanders and maintinence are all over.

15 posted on 08/26/2004 4:17:20 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cacique

Exactly. This will be career-ending for a number of officers beyond the Kennedy's captain. For one, the Combat Information Center Watch Officer on duty in the carrier CIC, probably the same for one or more such duty officers on the screening ships.


16 posted on 08/26/2004 4:17:25 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (hoplophobia is a mental aberration rather than a mere attitude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Viet-Boat-Rider
I was on a ship in 1976 where the Captain was relieved on the spot during a visit to Bahrain due to the Officer of the Deck running the ship aground. No questions asked just bye bye and then an Admiral's inquiry.
Standard operating procedure.
17 posted on 08/26/2004 4:17:50 PM PDT by Wooly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Viet-Boat-Rider

Dhow
18 posted on 08/26/2004 4:18:56 PM PDT by Samurai_Jack (I pray that Im wrong about alot of things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

there were a lot of people asleep at the switch... like the deck watches...
A dhow is a rather small boat so it is not going to show up on radar, but damn the deck watches should have seen it. even if it were at night... not only the carrier watches but the crusiers and plane watch destroyers... there are going to be quite a few captians masts i believe.


19 posted on 08/26/2004 4:19:18 PM PDT by Americanwolf (Gnawing at the shinbone of the democratic party since 1991. (And no it does not taste like chicken))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tracer

thanks...I can't see how the ship's captain, and not the admiral, wasn't relieved..Aren't carrier captains already pre-screened for flag rank..


20 posted on 08/26/2004 4:19:32 PM PDT by ken5050 (Bill Clinton has just signed to be the national spokesman for Hummer..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson