Posted on 08/26/2004 2:14:52 AM PDT by kattracks
CNSNews.com) - Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry's 1971 testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee reveals that the then anti-war activist admitted to writing many of the battle reports during his four months of combat in Vietnam.
Kerry told the committee on April 22, 1971, "...I can recall often sending in the spot reports which we made after each mission..."
Kerry also said that many in the military had "a tendency to report what they want to report and see what they want to see."
Kerry's comments about the battle reports came in response to a question from then Senator Stuart Symington (D- Mo.), who wondered about the accuracy of information from military sources.
According to the testimony , which is available in the Congressional Record, Sen. Symington asked Kerry, "Mr. Kerry, from your experience in Vietnam do you think it is possible for the President or Congress to get accurate and undistorted information through official military channels.[?]"
Kerry responded, "I had direct experience with that. Senator, I had direct experience with that and I can recall often sending in the spot reports which we made after each mission; and including the GDA, gunfire damage assessments, in which we would say, maybe 15 sampans sunk or whatever it was. And I often read about my own missions in the Stars and Stripes and the very mission we had been on had been doubled in figures and tripled in figures.
Kerry later added, "I also think men in the military, sir, as do men in many other things, have a tendency to report what they want to report and see what they want to see."
The 34-year-old testimony could shed light on the present debate over who wrote key battlefield reports that critics of Kerry say allowed him to win awards.
B. G. Burkett, author of the book Stolen Valor and a military researcher, calls the 1971 testimony "significant."
"What is significant about this is [Kerry] is readily admitting that he often submitted reports and he is implying that he himself exaggerated in those reports," Burkett told CNSNews.com.
"We have no way of knowing specifically which documents Kerry composed; and of the the ones he did compose -- did he in fact exaggerate or outright lie in those reports? That is the issue here," Burkett said.
\tx0
The controversy about who authored the now controversial after-action reports arose earlier this week, when the Washington Post obtained the military records of Larry Thurlow, one of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. Thurlow's military records indicated that enemy fire erupted after Kerry's boat was hit by a mine explosion on March 13, 1969.
Thurlow now insists there was no enemy fire that day. The best selling new book by John O'Neill and Jerome Corsi, Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry, details the groups' critique of Kerry. Kerry has denounced the book and the Swift Boat vets and accused them of being an affiliate of President Bush's re-election campaign.
Thurlow and Kerry were each awarded a Bronze Star for heroism on that 13th day of March. Kerry also received his third Purple Heart as a result of the events of that day.
At the center of the controversy is whether or not there was enemy fire during Kerry's rescue of James Rassmann from the Bay Hap River. Kerry and Rassmann and others say there was enemy fire, while Thurlow and other swift boat veterans insist there was not.
Thurlow's own Bronze Star citation states that there was "enemy small arms and automatic weapons fire" directed at "all units." But Thurlow believes his citation was based on Kerry's own account of the day.
"I am convinced that the language used in my citation ... was language taken directly from John Kerry's report," Thurlow said earlier this week. "John Kerry was the only officer who filed a report describing his version of the incident," Thurlow added.
The Washington Post summed up the controversy this way: "Much of the debate over who is telling the truth boils down to whether the two-page after-action report and other Navy records are accurate or whether they have been embellished by Kerry or someone else."
Burkett believes that Kerry stated the controversy surrounding his war record.
"Kerry thought that he could make a grand presentation of his combat record, and there would be no response, obviously, from the Republicans, considering the lack of military experience on that side of the aisle," Burkett said.
"I think [Kerry] completely misjudged the anger of Vietnam Veterans collectively and their ability to organize and have an answer to John Kerry," he added.
See Related Articles: Kerry 'Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief,' Say Former Military Colleagues (05/03/2004) Kerry Files Complaint With FEC Against Swift Boat Veterans (08/20/2004) Kerry Campaign, Liberal Group Attack Anti-Kerry Book ((08/20/2004) MoveOn Ads OK; Swift Boat Ads Not OK, Kerry Campaign Says (08/20/2004)
E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.
Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.
Oh, brother! I misunderstood what I was reading. I thought that the comment had to do with Kerry's words when he returned home from Vietnam. I thought he was saying that the Republicans in Congress back *then* had no military experience. Thanks for clearing it up. It should have been obvious to me. And yes, great miscalculation.
Thanks for the ping!
Shortly after the RNC Convention - Bush will get a nice bump in the polls, and at that point Kerry will basically be chum in the water and the media sharks will go into a frenzy... That's my belief and I'm sticking to it...
No matter what side they may appear to be on, when the media smells blood in the water, well, you know...
You dont think Kerry would write a false report, do you?
ROFLMAO
Now John F*ckin's admitted to falsifying battlefield reports...
NAILED!
I have lost count also. Is anyone keeping score?
He lied and a lot of good men died?
Bump
Were not a lot of his unit's reports signed by the initials "KJW" or something similar?
Was this mystery report signer Kerry?
ping
LOL......that's a good one!
Now, will he blow the gasket beofre he blows the gasket?
He has multiple gaskets.
Good morning.
While researching his book on our company, "I served", Don Hall requested and received thousands of documents from the National Archives. After action reports, daily logs, rosters, it's all there waiting for industrious data miners. Only those documents that are still classified and those that are personal, such as medical records are not for release without a form 180 or declassification.
I would bet that the Swiftees still have more ammo to throw at john kerry.
Michael Frazier
Kerry's exaggerations about his bravery sound similar to the self-aggrandizing claims Al Gore made about his inventions.
And I often read about my own missions in the Stars and Stripes and the very mission we had been on had been doubled in figures and tripled in figures."<<< That should be easy to check...assuming Stars and Stripes has an archive...I personally doubt that Kerry or his missions were mentioned!...Can anybody check that out????????
Gee ... Did he Volunteer for that too??
The part about the Stars & Stripes in very interesting
Nazi symapthiser Charles Lindburg running for President?That's how Kerry's run appears to me.
If Charles Lindberg was running for president in 1972 on his hero status, despite his Nazi sympathies 35+ years prior, how could he have gotten away with it?
Kerry publicity stated back then that only 3,000 South Vietnamese would be "displaced" if the US completely pulled out of there.
After we did that in 1975, between 1 to 3 million SE Asians were murdered and/or displaced {boat people/ concentration camps}
Maybe Lindberg could have gotten away with it if Hitler had won and held his gains in Europe....
Nazi symapthiser Charles Lindburg running for President?That's how Kerry's run appears to me.
If Charles Lindberg was running for president in 1972 on his hero status, despite his Nazi sympathies 35+ years prior, how could he have gotten away with it?
Kerry publicity stated back then that only 3,000 South Vietnamese would be "displaced" if the US completely pulled out of there.
After we did that in 1975, between 1 to 3 million SE Asians were murdered and/or displaced {boat people/ concentration camps}
Maybe Lindberg could have gotten away with it if Hitler had won and held his gains in Europe....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.