Meaning...there appears to have been a war in Asia somewhere near the time that Kerry was there.
Not that it will matter, but I sent O'Reilly an email today suggesting that, if he was the great investigative reporter he made himself out to be, he would take the time to check the facts instead of give Kerry a free ride.
Wait until it becomes more widely known that Kerry had his silver heart citations rewritten to omit the fact that he shot that kid in the back behind the hooch. I guess Kerry forgot to tell Rood that part, because that's the only thing that Rood verified, except the enemy fire.
**Chris Wallace and Bill O'Reilly both agreed that Kerry's story was more accurate than that of the SBV, even after the 1st PH and Christmas in Cambodia retractions.**
We'll have to see what these two say this week/weekend.
The thing that hits you right between the eyes is that he fled the scene and only returned when there was no sign of firing. Despite the purple prose he wrote up to get himself a medal, common sense and deductive reasoning paints a very different scenario of what went down that day. The Swifties tell the truth. Kerry is a yellow bellied coward and a liar. Why don't Matthews and O'Reilly delicately pick away at this point? How many lies is Kerry allowed, how many flip flops, rich and dumb wives, the abysmal senate record, lies about medical records, military records, smears against Viet vets, God, the list is endless. Hill would almost be a relief. Speaking of which, at what point do the RATs give Kerry the hook and crown Hill Queen of the Universe?