Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Antarctic Craters Reveal Strike
BBC ^ | 8-23-2004

Posted on 08/23/2004 6:58:34 AM PDT by blam

Antarctic craters reveal strike

The asteroid may have raised sea levels by up to 60cm

Scientists have mapped enormous impact craters hidden under the Antarctic ice sheet using satellite technology. The craters may have either come from an asteroid between 5 and 11km across that broke up in the atmosphere, a swarm of comets or comet fragments.

The space impacts created multiple craters over an area of 2,092km (1,300 miles) by 3,862km (2,400 miles).

The scientists told a conference this week that the impacts occurred roughly 780,000 years ago during an ice age.

When the impacts hit, they would have melted through the ice and through the crust below.

Professor Frans van der Hoeven, from Delft University in the Netherlands, told the International Geographical Union Congress in Glasgow that the biggest single strike seared a hole in the ice sheet roughly 322km (200 miles) by 322km.

Impact melt

This would have melted about 1% of the ice sheet, raising water levels worldwide by 60cm (2ft).

The research suggests that an asteroid the size of the one blamed for killing off the dinosaurs 65 million years ago could have struck Earth relatively recently.

Early humans would have been living in Africa and other parts of the Old World at the time of the strikes.

But the impacts would have occurred during an ice age, so even tidal waves would have been weakened by the stabilising effect of icebergs on the ocean.

The craters were resolved using satellite data to map gravity anomalies under the ice sheet.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antarctic; antarctica; asteroid; catastrophism; craters; eltanin; eltaninimpact; extinction; flemath; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; hapgood; impact; levy; massextinction; reveal; shoemaker; strike; velaincident
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
To: HawkeyeLonewolf

Shiva Danced the Universe into Being!

41 posted on 08/23/2004 9:33:57 AM PDT by balrog666 ("One man's theology is another man's belly laugh." -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
thanks, i had forgotten that.
42 posted on 08/23/2004 9:44:43 AM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: blam
Aren't these reports/discussions usually accompanied by maps? Where are the maps?
How does this tie in with the huge "lake" several thousand feet below the ice surface?
43 posted on 08/23/2004 9:50:21 AM PDT by Publius6961 (I don't do diplomacy either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
Bah, you're all just figments of my imagination and I'm just a brain in a jar.

OK, Donovan, how did you get Nancy to agree to be in your movie?

44 posted on 08/23/2004 9:53:56 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Any evidence of another iridium layer? Perhaps the impact wasn't as effusive.


45 posted on 08/23/2004 9:56:04 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: HawkeyeLonewolf
Blah blah blah blah blah...

Hadn't though of that excellent argument.

46 posted on 08/23/2004 10:00:05 AM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void

This is interesting. Maybe for the next one we will have the technology in place to capture the asteroid and mine it and run the L-5 Society program.


47 posted on 08/23/2004 10:02:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (Withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty and establish property rights)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Note the error in the first sentence of the Enoch Calendar.
48 posted on 08/23/2004 10:12:45 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

Year Zero?


49 posted on 08/23/2004 10:19:05 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Note the error in the first sentence of the Enoch Calendar.

Nobody said they knew how to count either.

50 posted on 08/23/2004 10:19:50 AM PDT by balrog666 ("One man's theology is another man's belly laugh." -- Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: HawkeyeLonewolf

You're confused. Each 24 hour period in God Time is actually a billion years. Consider that our time system is based upon earth rotation which has changed over the years.


51 posted on 08/23/2004 10:24:41 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Modernman
If the Earth was created around 10,000 years ago, why would God place all this misleading evidence in the geological record that suggests a much older Earth?

Such as???

The only thing that makes it "seem" older are flawed dating methods imagined by men.

52 posted on 08/23/2004 10:25:13 AM PDT by HawkeyeLonewolf (Christian First, American Second (Conservative Anti-Smoker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lepton

Since it SAYS 24 hour period, it's the same day we know as a day.

The word used for day ONLY means a 24 hour day.

God doesn't mince words.


53 posted on 08/23/2004 10:26:47 AM PDT by HawkeyeLonewolf (Christian First, American Second (Conservative Anti-Smoker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

I'm not confused IN THE SLIGHTEST.

Plain reading of scripture is clear. SIX literal days of creation.

Nothing in the fossil record contradicts this.

Nothing in the evidence we have contradicts this.

Pretty simple.


54 posted on 08/23/2004 10:29:56 AM PDT by HawkeyeLonewolf (Christian First, American Second (Conservative Anti-Smoker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: HawkeyeLonewolf
Hey! eFing recreates himself every few days, so what's new?
55 posted on 08/23/2004 10:32:28 AM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HawkeyeLonewolf
Actually, there's plenty of evidence in the fossil record that contradicts your belief. There's also countless evidence from many areas of science that do that as well. But the fact is, like a devout follower of Islam, you are blind to certain facts and will likely remain so forever.

You want to believe the literal aspect of Genesis at all costs, and that's cool if that's what you want, but don't pretend to have a lock on the truth because you don't. There are many ministers, priests, and hundreds of millions of Christians that don't agree with your itrepretation of Genesis.

Just a hint though.... day meant period of time in Hebrew. The bible DOES NOT indicate a literal time span. You need to get a better bible translation.

But I do like your bumber sticker designs on your profile. :)
56 posted on 08/23/2004 10:40:02 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

Thanks for the compliments on the designs :)

However, you're incorrect. The word used "yom" only means a literal 24 hour period -- and as I said, no one questions it EXCEPT in the first part of Genesis.

And, in fact, there is no evidence that contradicts.

There is evidence, period. It really neither supports or contradicts creation or evolution, it just is.

THERE ARE THEORIES about the evidence that contradict creation, but the evidence itself does not.

I am not blind to anything, either. I used to be a believer in evolution and the big bang -- then I matured and realized I was wrong.


57 posted on 08/23/2004 10:44:36 AM PDT by HawkeyeLonewolf (Christian First, American Second (Conservative Anti-Smoker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: HawkeyeLonewolf
Since it SAYS 24 hour period, it's the same day we know as a day.

It does not in anyway specify 24, much less 24 hours.

By the way, since you are relying upon the infallibility of human language, perhaps you'd like to compare the use of any number of words which have changed conotation in the last 50 years just in the U.S., much less the changes between the time the King James Bible was translated, and now.

There are several other layers of things you are overlooking in making such a brash claim.

And just because you will probably come to this sooner or later: I believe that God created the Heavens and Earth. I just think you undermine your own case with your claims.

58 posted on 08/23/2004 10:46:25 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

59 posted on 08/23/2004 10:47:27 AM PDT by HawkeyeLonewolf (Christian First, American Second (Conservative Anti-Smoker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lepton

First, my claim is on fact, nothing "brash"

Second, I've undermined nothing by stating the Biblical case. THere is no need to compromise truth for the best guesses of scientists when truth fits.

The word used for day is (Strongs 03117) yowm (pronounced: yome). This word when used with a number (first, second, etc) ALWAYS in HEBREW means a literal 24 hour period. That's the way the Hebrew has always been.

So yes, Scripture DOES clearly specify a 24 hour period. And to make it even MORE clear, God uses "the evening and the morning" before it -- just to make sure people wouldn't play fast and loose with the term.

Sadly, they still do.


60 posted on 08/23/2004 10:56:20 AM PDT by HawkeyeLonewolf (Christian First, American Second (Conservative Anti-Smoker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson