Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll: Bush-Kerry 47 -47

Posted on 08/22/2004 9:08:26 AM PDT by dr4gey

The latest Rasmussen Reports Presidential Tracking Poll shows Senator John Kerry with 47% of the vote and President George W. Bush with 47%.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; dailypolls; deadhead; polls; rasmussen
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 08/22/2004 9:08:26 AM PDT by dr4gey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dr4gey

What was the previous poll number?


2 posted on 08/22/2004 9:12:00 AM PDT by azgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr4gey
Link.
3 posted on 08/22/2004 9:13:15 AM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (I used to be schizophrenic, but we're fine now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azgirl
I think it was same yesterday. same as his Job approval at 52.
4 posted on 08/22/2004 9:13:35 AM PDT by Conservative_boy_in_Bangkok (DNC- "We have made a clone. We shall call him Minnie Dukakis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dr4gey
Link.
5 posted on 08/22/2004 9:13:57 AM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (I used to be schizophrenic, but we're fine now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dr4gey

This is good news as I heard on the Beltway Boys that Kerry was way ahead of Bush with electoral votes. Bush needs Ohio and I am praying that with Nader on the ballot...Bush will win that state. He also needs PA...I just pray the gop grassroots voters show up in droves.


6 posted on 08/22/2004 9:14:32 AM PDT by katiedidit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azgirl

There is no change from yesterday. It was tied at 47 and Bush's approval was at 52. Which I actually think that may be a small victory from Bush, cause normally Kerry picks up on Sunday as Democrats traditionally poll better on the weekends and Republcans during the week. Bush's best numbers are usually on Thur-Fri Sat. Kerry's best numbers are usually on Sun-Mon-Tue


7 posted on 08/22/2004 9:14:55 AM PDT by Nascardude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

I am deeply saddened by my double posting.


8 posted on 08/22/2004 9:15:20 AM PDT by southernnorthcarolina (I used to be schizophrenic, but we're fine now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dr4gey

Electoral vote tracking:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

http://www.electionprojection.com/elections2004.html


9 posted on 08/22/2004 9:18:26 AM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Kerry is taking a dive


10 posted on 08/22/2004 9:20:28 AM PDT by rocklobster11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: southernnorthcarolina

I thought you were just being schizophrenic.


11 posted on 08/22/2004 9:20:47 AM PDT by dr4gey (Moved from Oklahoma, now doing my part to help Bush in Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: katiedidit1

Bush will not get PA, unless the race turns sharphly in his favor.
He needs to carry OH, MO, NV, FL. Then (assuming WV and NH go to Kerry), we get 269-269 tie, and win in the House.

I think 48% national vote will be enough to give him OH and MO (he should do better in these states by about +2%, compared with his national average).
But FL is the problem. It is quite possible that W will do worse in FL, compared to his national numbers. In this case, he needs to get to 49.5-50%, and I don't see this happening.
Let's hope that we'll get some breaks again, as in 2000.


12 posted on 08/22/2004 9:22:38 AM PDT by ubaldus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dr4gey
Without the military vote.
Also, Republicans usually don't answer polls. Add 5 points for Bush on the polling alone (via Zogby interview on FOX, and the toe sucker interview on FOX).

Bush - 52+
Kerry - 42

13 posted on 08/22/2004 9:23:15 AM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rocklobster11

I certainly hope so.


14 posted on 08/22/2004 9:24:31 AM PDT by FairOpinion (FIGHT TERRORISM! VOTE BUSH/CHENEY 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ubaldus
But FL is the problem.

Last time, the Pan Handle didn't get their chance to vote before the liberal press called the state for Gore. I'll bet they'll make that slap in the face up this election. I would!

15 posted on 08/22/2004 9:28:02 AM PDT by concerned about politics ( Liberals are still stuck at the bottom of Maslow's Hierarchy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ubaldus

I can't tell from your profile page what state you're in. As a Floridian, I'm curious to know why you think President Bush will do worse.


16 posted on 08/22/2004 9:31:56 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (swimming through the blogosphere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dr4gey

THIS IS GOOD NEWS. THIS IS NOT STATISTICAL NOISE.

Rasmussen tracks generic congressional ballots (GCB) along with the presidential race. GCB about now is probably almost as stable as partisan affiliation. Thus, it can be used to measure whether their sampling has skewed towards the GOP or not. The last time Bush improved (8/16), the GCB showed a strong move towards the GOP. I didn't post the good news when I saw it, because I presumed it the sudden shift in the GCB indicated statistical noise. This time, the GCB shows no move towards the GOP. Since I'm not too afraid of the GOP losing control of the Congress, I take this as good news.


17 posted on 08/22/2004 9:33:30 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

>>Also, Republicans usually don't answer polls. <<

The history of polling does not bear this out. Even in 1994, polling showed the Republicans would sweep through the Senate. The poll sponsors simply didn't believe the results they were getting. But readers of the NY Post expected the sweep.


18 posted on 08/22/2004 9:36:14 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EllaMinnow

>>> As a Floridian, I'm curious to know why you think President Bush will do worse.

1. Retirees. Bush is doing badly in 65+ age group, worse than in 2000. They want more, more, more ..., and not happy with the drug benefit, I guess.

2. Cuban vote was energized in 2000 by Elian story. Not this time. Also, younger Cubans trend Democratic.

3. Jewish vote. No evidence so far that W made any inroads there.

That's why the Florida polls are so abysmal, and show that W is doing worse in FL than nationally (unlike in 2000). It is alarming, since winning FL is a must.


19 posted on 08/22/2004 9:40:06 AM PDT by ubaldus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dangus

If there are any "truisms" in polling that are actually true, the pollsters would know them to be so and adjust their numbers accordingly.

That being said, if the affluent of either party are travelling in the summer on vacation and not available to answer phones then Bush's numbers may be depressed, because it would be the affluent of either party.


20 posted on 08/22/2004 9:40:56 AM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson