Let's thank the protestors - their ugliness is the true visage of the modern Democrat party, and they do everything they can to make the American public see it.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
08/21/2004 4:43:06 PM PDT by
MadIvan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
To: agrace; lightingguy; EggsAckley; dinasour; AngloSaxon; Dont Mention the War; KangarooJacqui; ...
2 posted on
08/21/2004 4:43:30 PM PDT by
MadIvan
(Gothic. Freaky. Conservative. - http://www.rightgoths.com/)
To: MadIvan; davidtalker
Hey Ivan. Apropos of nothing, Freeper davidtalker (David Gold) mentioned you on his KSFO show today, but I missed the context... ???
3 posted on
08/21/2004 4:45:30 PM PDT by
bootless
(Never Forget - And Never Again)
To: MadIvan
This poof, with the hyphenated name, certainly knows how to lay on the smear wrt SBV4T, eh?
5 posted on
08/21/2004 4:48:21 PM PDT by
sauropod
(Hitlary: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
To: MadIvan
This is misleading:
At St Marks last week, activists emphasised their commitment to non-violent protest. One anarchist group will hold a tea party outside the mayors mansion... It's the Yippies, and their "tea" party consists of smoking pot (60s slang referred to pot as tea).
7 posted on
08/21/2004 4:50:54 PM PDT by
NYCVirago
To: MadIvan
In a park nearby another man, inexplicably attired in a red minidress, handed out invitations to a war crimes tribunal where President George W Bush would be judged by the American people.
Any guy who approaches me while wearing a minidress is in danger of getting a knuckle sandwich.
8 posted on
08/21/2004 4:51:41 PM PDT by
Begin
(RIP RWR 1911-2004)
To: MadIvan
On the balance this is a pretty fair article. Especially considering it's from the Times. But they blew it with this sentence...
"Despite evidence that the veterans group is politically motivated and that several members have lied or contradicted themselves, the affair has swamped the Democratic campaign."
I've seen NO evidence any of them have lied, and the only contridictions are coming from the Kerry campaign. But considering the rest of the crap I've read today, I'll give the Times at least a B+ for effort. I guess the latest democrat talking points haven't made it across the pond yet.
9 posted on
08/21/2004 4:52:25 PM PDT by
Rokke
To: MadIvan
BRAVO SIERRA. Jabba the Nadler told us just this week that these will be peaceful expressions of the first amendment.
10 posted on
08/21/2004 4:52:49 PM PDT by
glock rocks
(VK counter-intelligence)
To: MadIvan
Let's see, acid and nail studded potatoes. This ought to show just how dims play the political game. Sadly, if this were to happen, there will be some pubbies that will be paying the ultimate price.
11 posted on
08/21/2004 4:52:59 PM PDT by
conshack
To: MadIvan
In a park nearby another man, inexplicably attired in a red minidress..."Inexplicably"?
Mind you - this is the Lower East Side.
To: MadIvan
In a park nearby another man, inexplicably attired in a red minidress, handed out invitations to a war crimes tribunalThat's no way to describe the wife of the junior senator from Massachusetts! :)
14 posted on
08/21/2004 4:56:36 PM PDT by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
(I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
To: MadIvan
At the back of many Democrat minds are memories of their partys 1968 convention in Chicago, when rioting against the Vietnam war was widely seen as having damaged the campaign of Hubert Humphrey, the partys presidential nominee who crashed to defeat against Richard Nixon.This is a totally different scenario. In 1968, the chaos in the street reflected the chaos in the Democratic party. The internal problems experienced in the convention included multiple conflicts between prowar, antiwar, ethnic, leftist, and mainstream Democrats. The television coverage of the battles on the street was no more than a caricature of the battles within the party.
We have a different situation in New York. I don't think many people will see the grungy group of protesters as having any link to the Republican party. The worry for the Democrats is that some of these people will be rightfully attached to their ticket and they have no one to blame but themselves. The constant pot stirring, demogoguery, and high profile lying agitate these believers to come forward now and there is no way the Dems will be able to control it. It will correctly be linked to them as the party of the leftist lunacy.
To: MadIvan
The good thing is, no matter what they do, they are going to look like a bunch of nutcases and that's going to embarrass a lot of "normal" democrats. It may well be the thing that tips them away from the Democrat party.
Have you seen some of those protesters? LOL!
17 posted on
08/21/2004 5:04:54 PM PDT by
McGavin999
(If Kerry can't deal with the "Republican Attack Machine" how is he going to deal with Al Qaeda)
To: MadIvan
I'm still scratching my head over nail-studded potatoes.
19 posted on
08/21/2004 5:08:59 PM PDT by
Dog Gone
To: MadIvan
After the huge protests hit would be a great time for the Pubs to show some 1970s clips of Kerry involved in those demonstrations. Make the link for the people between the Dems of 70s and the Dems of today. Same ol' Leftists.
20 posted on
08/21/2004 5:09:12 PM PDT by
DeweyCA
To: MadIvan
The Swiftees are NOT in any way subsidized nor affiliated with the GOP/RNC;unlike the connection between the Dems and MoveOn etc.!
Kerry wants it to still be 1968,or 1972,so he'll have to live with the flap over his lies.
It appears that "THOSE WHO DO NOT KNOW HISTORY,ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT IT",holds true. LOL
Every protester,every little anarchist and old hippie,are going to deliver a landslide for Bush.They just can't control themselves,no matter WHAT some "cooler heads" say.They will,unfortunately,do something terrible.And yes,as the shouted ,as some silly battle cry,in 1968,THE WHOLE WORLD IS WATCHING. Fat lot of "good" it them back then.... and it'll generate reaction in 2004! LOL
To: MadIvan
Anarchists are going to have a tea party??!!???? I think I'd vote "anyone but Kerry" just so I wouldn't even be remotely connected to such a silly idea.
I mean, jeeesssh! And we are to take them seriously?
23 posted on
08/21/2004 5:14:19 PM PDT by
3catsanadog
(When anything goes, everything does.)
To: MadIvan
I was worried about the protests. now I am rather looking forward to them *g*
To: MadIvan
One anarchist group will hold a tea party outside the mayors mansion; other events include a Books not Bombs youth convergence, a hip-hop protest and party and a public reading of the American constitution.
This is my favorite part. If they are anarchists, what do they care what the Constitution says? I'm sure I'm not the only person who sees the irony here.
25 posted on
08/21/2004 5:15:27 PM PDT by
fr_freak
To: MadIvan
The Republicans will do all they can to make the street protesters look like the disruptive, concealed and explosive heart of the Democratic party, Not a big thing to do, 'cause THEY ARE!!
27 posted on
08/21/2004 5:17:20 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(I want to die in my sleep like Gramps -- not yelling and screaming like those in his car)
To: MadIvan
Good post. I work in NYC and live in the borough of Queens and I have talked to the people here and they DO NOT want the protestors here. And they are Democrats. They know that most of the protestors are not from NYC and that makes them even more madder that they would invade NY and start trouble. Don't be surprised if you read about typical NYers taking on the Protestors!
29 posted on
08/21/2004 5:25:25 PM PDT by
areafiftyone
(Democrats = the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson