Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"one head, one bottom and a torso cannot possibly fly on its own"

A quote to remember when the French take great pains to arrogantly remind us of their supposed cultural superiority.

1 posted on 08/14/2004 1:30:20 PM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Stoat
A British woman born without arms or legs is suing Air France, claiming she was told she could not fly because she has no limbs.

True, true. One would need wings, at the very least... :)

2 posted on 08/14/2004 1:32:52 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

It'll get thrown out of court; she doesn't have a leg to stand on. Barumpbump.


3 posted on 08/14/2004 1:33:31 PM PDT by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

"an Air France employee in Manchester told her "one head, one bottom and a torso cannot possibly fly on its own".


My response would have been "that's why I'm taking a plane you moron"


4 posted on 08/14/2004 1:34:23 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Here, bite down on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

I'm surprised she isn't suing to become a flight attendant


5 posted on 08/14/2004 1:34:45 PM PDT by agitator (...And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

C'mon, they could seat her in the row with the least amount of leg room, and she wouldn't complain...


7 posted on 08/14/2004 1:36:37 PM PDT by Koblenz (Not bad, not bad at all. -- Ronald Reagan, the Greatest President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

"fly on IT'S own"???
Makes one boggle greatly at the implications of that statement.
A person isn't a person to them, but an 'it'..


8 posted on 08/14/2004 1:39:06 PM PDT by Darksheare (I'll bayonet your snowmen and beat you down with a chinese yo-yo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat
" born without limbs because her mother took the drug thalidomide during pregnancy."

Not that it means anything, but hadn't thalidomide already been banned by the 1960's?

9 posted on 08/14/2004 1:39:17 PM PDT by oprahstheantichrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

When I saw this thread bob to the top of the latest posts, I suspected I'd read it and be furious. But I must admit, the good humor displayed to this point has been disarming.


10 posted on 08/14/2004 1:39:48 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat
but only after she paid for a companion to fly with her.

... and amazingly enough, her companion had no head, no torso, but did have arms and legs, thereby fulfilling the Air France requirements.

11 posted on 08/14/2004 1:40:11 PM PDT by glock rocks (WHat are you? omnipivoyant or sumthin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

USAir and America West will take her, she's the perfect size for their seating arrangements.


14 posted on 08/14/2004 1:44:30 PM PDT by Charlotte Corday (I don't burn the flag because I can. I will burn the flag if I can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

This is a repost, but at least I get to ask, "Couldn't she have flown carry-on?"


18 posted on 08/14/2004 1:52:41 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

All jokes aside the Frof are a Compassionate people : Arent they?


21 posted on 08/14/2004 1:59:47 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

frof=frogs


22 posted on 08/14/2004 2:00:10 PM PDT by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

She was in negotiations with a law firm that represents wooden-legged litigants, but they broke it off.


25 posted on 08/14/2004 2:06:33 PM PDT by Mentos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat
Ping.

This reads like a Monty Python skit.

28 posted on 08/14/2004 2:17:25 PM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat
From the U.S. Department of Transportation -

§ 382.31 Refusal of transportation.

(a) Unless specifically permitted by a provision of this part, a carrier shall not refuse to provide transportation to a qualified individual with a disability on the basis of his or her disability.

(b) A carrier shall not refuse to provide transportation to a qualified individual with a disability solely because the person’s disability results in appearance or involuntary behavior that may offend, annoy, or inconvenience crewmembers or other passengers.

(c) A carrier shall not refuse to provide transportation to qualified individuals with a disability by limiting the number of such persons who are permitted to travel on a given flight.

(d) Carrier personnel, as authorized by 49 U.S.C. 44902, 14 CFR 91.8, or 14 CFR 121.533, may refuse to provide transportation to any passenger on the basis of safety, and may refuse to provide transportation to any passenger whose carriage would violate the Federal Aviation Regulations. In exercising this authority, carrier personnel shall not discriminate against any qualified individual with a disability on the basis of disability and their actions shall not be inconsistent with the provisions of this Part. In the event that such action is inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, the carrier shall be subject to remedies provided under § 382.65.

(e) When a carrier refuses to provide transportation to any person on a basis relating to the individual’s disability, the carrier shall specify in writing to the person the basis for the refusal, including, where applicable, the reasonable and specific basis for the carrier’s opinion that transporting the person would or might be inimical to the safety of the flight. This written explanation shall be provided within 10 calendar days of the refusal of transportation.

If Air France is found to be in violation of the law and they fail to remedy the situation, their common carrier status should be revoked.

30 posted on 08/14/2004 2:21:43 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat
Oh, sure... they told her it was "first class seating"...

... but: they lied. They LIED!

32 posted on 08/14/2004 2:34:48 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

I think the following is the original "What do you call a guy with no arms and no legs" joke.

What do you call a guy with no arms and no legs in the swimming pool? Bob

then there's-- What do you call a guy with no arms and no legs playing baseball? Third Base


33 posted on 08/14/2004 2:38:36 PM PDT by Lexington Green (I'm voting with our soldiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

>>>claims an Air France employee in Manchester told her "one head, one bottom and a torso cannot possibly fly on its own".

>>>She says she was allowed on another flight, but only after she paid for a companion to fly with her.

From this article, Air France is stating she can't fly without a companion. Meaning ASSISTANCE.

Not that I am willingly defending anything 'france'. But, Air France or any establishment have the right to require the disabled to come with their own assistance.


36 posted on 08/14/2004 2:50:01 PM PDT by Calpernia ("People never like what they don't understand")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Stoat

"She said in her legal action she is able to control her wheelchair and has travelled by air on many occasions. "

If she has flown before without limbs then she may very well have a case. It's tragic enough to go through life like this and then to have someone come along and deny her this is pretty sad.


39 posted on 08/14/2004 2:52:15 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson