Posted on 08/14/2004 6:23:17 AM PDT by Horatio Gates
neither man should go near communion.......
O'Malley won't offer blessing; Paulist priest to deliver invocation , July 26, 2004
The Kerry campaign said last night it is seeking to have the Rev. John B. Ardis, director of the Paulist Center, deliver an invocation at the convention. The Paulist Center is on Beacon Hill, where Kerry lives, and the senator and his wife have often worshiped at the chapel there[snip]Ardis is a member of the Paulist Fathers, an order of Catholic priests dedicated to the evangelization of America. The Paulist Center, which he heads, is particularly popular among liberal Catholics, many of them disaffected from neighborhood parishes.
Bingo. In McGreevey's case, his abortion stance, and his adulterous affair which apparently went on for years should have made reception of the Eucharist a no-no.
To the author, Dr. Kengor, I would say,I'm not impressed by this man's behavior, public or private.
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2003/7/prweb73570.htm
Boston yoga teacher, Carmela Cattuti, will be teaching threee [sic] 45 minute lunch time yoga classes at the Paulist Center in downtown Boston
The sanctuary where Sen. John Kerry regularly receives Communion attracts Catholics uncomfortable with some of the Vatican's orthodox teachings or who otherwise feel alienated from the Roman Catholic Church.The Paulist Center's congregation includes gay couples, whose adopted children are baptized there, unlike in some other Boston parishes. In November, its leaders refused to read aloud during Mass from a letter opposing gay marriage, as requested by the Massachusetts bishops.
They should be excommunicated. This debate is getting much mileage at my parish.
Book Discussion Groups Meets Monday, August 23
to discuss Michael Moores best seller, Stupid White Men.
A reading from a letter of St. Michael Moore to the ignorant...and I thought things were bad here in the Seattle area! I saw something called FREP on the newsletter. Caught my attention real quick, thought it said FREEP
He has the integrity to discipline himself for moral misconduct ???
Hardly, the homosexual perversions would have elevated him to greater heights in the eyes of the dnc.
He is resigning before all the charges of corruption, theft, and other illegal activities catch up to him.
Also from the bulletin is this item (given what we know about this place, I sort of wonder if it is really the "Heller Award", but they use the term "Hecker" in a veiled attempt not to offend - I am sure it is only given to those who actively undermine Church dogma):
2005 Hecker Award Nominations
Just two months left. Beat the rush! Submit your entry now! Flyers with guidelines are available in the racks.
For a list of past Hecker award winners (many on the list are heretics):
http://www.paulist.org/boston/information/hecker/awards.htm
First one... numero uno... the 'crux-of-the-biscuit', the one you wanna state something in that distinguishes you from the rest of the fat, pompous solons.
He is a lying corrupt dem crapweasels and they do not leave a power base when there is more to be stolen no matter how much shame and scandal they bring on themselves. Willie stayed. Every other dem criminal has stayed in office seeking to "put this behind us and move on." The only one to resign was Torricelli but that was simply a tactical move because he knew he couldn't win in the election.
And, NO, no one in the ultra-left wing media would dare ask Kerry to resign because it would be too painful for all of them if he said "yes." They have a lot invested in Kerry.
KERRY: RESIGN AND APOLOGIZE!!!
For what its worth...
What this means is that he would continue to receive communion in instances where he was not causing public scandal. That's as acceptable for him as it would be for any other anonymous pro-choice Catholic (which is to say it's a sin, but most priests won't stop you).
Thanks for the link.
I admit - only half of the time does the award go to those who actively undermine Church dogma.
I guess these "progressive Catholics" (puke) try to be fair and balanced when it comes to discussion of dogma - I mean, why would Catholics be biased toward their own dogma?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.