Posted on 08/13/2004 7:04:44 AM PDT by axiom9
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.
John ONeill is the co-author of Unfit For Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry. Mr. ONeill succeeded John Kerrys command of the PCF-94 swift boat in Vietnam. And John Hurley is the national director of Veterans for Kerry.
Let me ask you gentlemen about these questions. But lets start with the central notion that a lot of us have of John Kerry. Whatever you think of his politics, he was a war hero. Is that true?
JOHN ONEILL, SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH: Thats not true at all.
MATTHEWS: Why isnt it true?
ONEILL: More than 60 people from his unit are in this book right here. He served with 23 officers in this unit. There are 17 of them that have signed our letter condemning him. They have some very good reasons why.
MATTHEWS: OK.
ONEILL: First of all, he was there a very short period of time.
Second, as the book outlines, he fabricated at least two of his Purple Hearts, I think conclusively, based on the documentation.
MATTHEWS: All right.
ONEILL: He provided false reports and then he went home. Thats OK.
But he was no war hero.
MATTHEWS: OK, lets start with this from the top.
And I want to you join in this right on the top here. Youre both familiar with his military record. He was in Vietnam how long, John?
JOHN HURLEY, NATIONAL DIRECTOR, VIETNAM VETERANS FOR JOHN KERRY: He conductedhe had two tours in Vietnam, one on the USS Gridley and one on the swift boat, two swift boats in the Delta?
MATTHEWS: Do you could concur on that?
ONEILL: Not at all. The USS Gridley was not a tour in Vietnam. It was a ship way off the coast of Vietnam.
(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...
But, first, the latest headlines.
(NEWS BREAK)
MATTHEWS: Welcome back to HARDBALL.
John ONeill is the co-author of Unfit For Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry. Mr. ONeill succeeded John Kerrys command of the PCF-94 swift boat in Vietnam. And John Hurley is the national director of Veterans for Kerry.
Let me ask you gentlemen about these questions. But lets start with the central notion that a lot of us have of John Kerry. Whatever you think of his politics, he was a war hero. Is that true?
JOHN ONEILL, SWIFT BOAT VETERANS FOR TRUTH: Thats not true at all.
MATTHEWS: Why isnt it true?
ONEILL: More than 60 people from his unit are in this book right here. He served with 23 officers in this unit. There are 17 of them that have signed our letter condemning him. They have some very good reasons why.
MATTHEWS: OK.
ONEILL: First of all, he was there a very short period of time.
Second, as the book outlines, he fabricated at least two of his Purple Hearts, I think conclusively, based on the documentation.
MATTHEWS: All right.
ONEILL: He provided false reports and then he went home. Thats OK.
But he was no war hero.
MATTHEWS: OK, lets start with this from the top.
And I want to you join in this right on the top here. Youre both familiar with his military record. He was in Vietnam how long, John?
JOHN HURLEY, NATIONAL DIRECTOR, VIETNAM VETERANS FOR JOHN KERRY: He conductedhe had two tours in Vietnam, one on the USS Gridley and one on the swift boat, two swift boats in the Delta?
MATTHEWS: Do you could concur on that?
ONEILL: Not at all. The USS Gridley was not a tour in Vietnam. It was a ship way off the coast of Vietnam.
MATTHEWS: But my brother was on one of those ships that was off the shore. And that was considered combat.
ONEILL: He was there for five weeks on the Gridley off the coast.
MATTHEWS: But was that recorded as combat theater duty?
ONEILL: Absolutely.
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: But he was on the Gridley for five weeks off the coast.
MATTHEWS: OK.
Lets try to use Naval language and Naval rulings here and not personal reflections.
ONEILL: Sure.
MATTHEWS: OK.
Was he given credit, John Hurley, for serving in Vietnam when he was on that ship?
HURLEY: Yes. Yes.
MATTHEWS: Was he given credit by the Navy for serving in Vietnam?
ONEILL: Yes. But it would never have been considered a tour in Vietnam by the Navy or anybody else.
MATTHEWS: Well, why was he given credit for it?
ONEILL: Well, he was given credit for exactly what he did, which was being on the Gridley off the coast. It was not a one-year tour of Vietnam.
MATTHEWS: Lets go to the question of the Silver Star. How did he win the Silver Star?
HURLEY: He won the Silver Star when PCF-94, which is his second command in Vietnam, came under ambush in February of 1969. John Kerry ordered his helmsman, Del Sandusky, to turn the boat into the ambush. They went in.
As they beached the boat, V.C. with a grenade launcher, an RPG, stood up 10 feet away from them and started running away. They had already opened fire. Tommy Belodeau was on the bow gun that day. He winged this guy in the leg. But the guy did not break stride. He kept right on running. Took off. Kerry took off after him, got off the boat with an M-16.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: By himself.
HURLEY: No. He was followed by Mike Medeiros and subsequently followed by Tommy Belodeau.
MATTHEWS: And he was leading the way?
HURLEY: He was leading the way. And he chased this guy down a path.
Fred Short, who was on the twin 50s that day, will tell you that he observed the whole thing. He followed him down a path that this V.C. was turning towards the boat with the armed B-40 rocket and John Kerry killed him.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Now, who put him up for the award, for the Silver?
HURLEY: I do not know.
MATTHEWS: But he received the Silver Star.
HURLEY: He did receive the Silver Star.
MATTHEWS: And who has to approve the Silver Star?
HURLEY: In this case, it was Admiral Zumwalt. Admiral Zumwalt said in 1996 that he felt John Kerry deserved a Navy Cross for his actions that day.
MATTHEWS: Which is a much higher award.
HURLEY: Which is a much higher award.
But that it would have to have gone back to the Pentagon for approval. He was looking for a morale booster in the Delta. He could issue a Silver Star on his own authority and did so and issued it very quickly to John Kerry.
MATTHEWS: Do you deny that he won the Silver Star?
ONEILL: Well, he received the Silver Star.
MATTHEWS: Do you deny that he deserved it?
ONEILL: Absolutely.
MATTHEWS: Why?
ONEILL: Because...
MATTHEWS: Why do you disagree with the Navy on this?
ONEILL: Well, because the Navy didnt have the facts.
The citation, which you can read in the book Unfit For Command, says that he turned into superior forces and into intense fire. He was on a gunboat with 20 or 30 troops. It was a huge gunboat. There was a single fleeing Viet Cong.
Commander Elliott, who wrote the citation, indicated he didnt understand that. All of us defend his right to shoot that guy in the back because the guy had fired at him. None of us say that was a war crime. What we do say, had the Navy known the actual facts, he wouldnt have received the Silver Star. There was an Army...
MATTHEWS: Well, who put him up for the award?
ONEILL: Commander Elliott, based on the notion that he had gone into a bunker full of a large number of Viet Cong by himself.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: How did he get that notion?
ONEILL: Because John Kerry told him that, because thats what the report carefully read by John Kerry says for that day, on that day, March theFebruary the 28th.
MATTHEWS: You, in other words, argue that the Silver Star he received was wrongly awarded because of failure of the right information to reach Elliott and then that Zumwalt was simply given further bad information.
ONEILL: Yes, based on the report Kerry himself provided and the information he provided. We dont deny that Kerry should have gotten, acted with ordinary courage. We dont attack Kerry for shooting the kid in the back.
MATTHEWS: How do you assess the fact of a commander of a ship bringing a ship basically, beaching a swift boat, going into land, hostile territory, knowing that theres V.C. all around and chasing after a guy in very much hostile territory. If you dont call that courage, what would you call that?
ONEILL: I think it involves an ordinary degree of courage, Chris. I just dont think that thats the Silver Star.
MATTHEWS: So, in other words, he showed courage in Vietnam.
ONEILL: I think that in chasing this kid and shooting him in the back, that that involved some degree of courage. And I believe we all believe that that involved some degree of physical courage.
MATTHEWS: Well, he risked his life, didnt he?
ONEILL: I dont believe that...
MATTHEWS: You mean he didnt face enemy, potential enemy fire by going up on the beach in Vietnam in V.C. territory?
ONEILL: You mean on that occasion?
MATTHEWS: Yes.
ONEILL: I dont really think so, Chris. We had people shoot at us.
John Kerry got shot at. Im not denying that John Kerry in being shot at showed courage. I think he did, just like all the rest of us.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Well, compare that to Bushs record in Vietnam.
ONEILL: Well, Im not here to...
MATTHEWS: No, I mean, if a man shows any courage in the battlefield, hes done more than most people do in this country. Hes gone out and fought for his country and risked his life for his country and shot one of the enemy for his country. That puts him a step above most people, doesnt it?
ONEILL: I think he is millions of steps behind, because he went over...
MATTHEWS: Behind whom?
ONEILL: Behind everybody.
MATTHEWS: You mean Bush? President Bush?
ONEILL: Yes. Im not going to speak to President Bush.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: No, because youre out here as a proactive indicter of this guys war record. Youve chosen to take this role, to write this book, to get these allies to make these case. Youre a Republican from Texas. Youre making this case against the guy.
And Im simply saying, you cant just go out here and take these shots without being responded to by me. Im going to ask you, is he less a hero than Bush?
ONEILL: And I would like to answer, if youll give me a chance.
MATTHEWS: Sure. Sure. Plenty of time. Take all the time you want.
ONEILL: First of all, Im not a Republican from Texas. Thats just not true.
Second, with respect to what he did, we dont challenge that he went ashore that day. With respect to overall, he had very limited accomplishments in the short period he was in Vietnam and he came back here and delivered almost a death blow to the U.S. military by lying.
MATTHEWS: OK, thats another issue. Well get to that issue.
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: Just a second.
MATTHEWS: Thats why youre mad at him.
ONEILL: Absolutely not.
First of all, I believe that his comments and the war crimes claims back here were absolutely wrong. And Ill never forget those. Neither will the guys.
MATTHEWS: What war crimes?
ONEILL: His claims that U.S. troops committed war crimes on a day-to-day basis, that we were like Genghis Khan.
But a wholly separate issue is, did exaggerate his service in Vietnam?
And my answer to that is, clearly he did.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: But you have a record going back yourself. But you go back to the Nixon era, when Nixon was looking for someone. Colson and those guys were looking for somebody to debunk the Kerry record, because all the records show they were scared to death of this guy. And you played that role. You close to play that role.
ONEILL: Once...
MATTHEWS: Im sorry. I dont want to get
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: Thats just not true.
MATTHEWS: By the way, disabuse the public who are watching right now what Im wrong about. Where do you live?
ONEILL: I live in Houston, Texas.
MATTHEWS: OK, youre a Texan.
Have you voted Democrat recently for president?
ONEILL: Absolutely. I havent voted for a Republican since 1988. As a matter of fact, I just backed the Democratic mayor of Houston, Bill White.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: OK, so youve votedyoure generally a Republican or a Democrat when it comes to voting for president?
ONEILL: It depends on the person, Chris.
MATTHEWS: Did you vote for Clinton?
ONEILL: No, actually.
MATTHEWS: Did you vote for Gore?
ONEILL: I voted for Perot twice.
MATTHEWS: OK. Did you vote for Gore?
ONEILL: I voted for Gore. I voted for Gore. I dont know really why I should go into my voting record.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: No, because it comes down to the question. Were going over the issue here of you going after a guys war record and admitting he was courageous in battle, but then arguing about the nature of the way he was awarded the Silver Star. Im just wondering why youre doing this.
ONEILL: Well, the reason Im doing it is, he wildly exaggerated two things. He wildly exaggerated his record, which...
MATTHEWS: Well, lets start with that. Were going down the record.
ONEILL: Can I finish answering the question?
MATTHEWS: He won the Silver Star. He was put up for it by Generalby Admiral...
ONEILL: Youre not going to let me answer.
MATTHEWS: No, Im letting you answer it. But help me out here.
ONEILL: All right.
MATTHEWS: He got the Silver Star. He got the Bronze Star. He won three Purple Hearts. Youre saying this is all just unfair.
ONEILL: Im saying that, with respect to his Silver Star, he exaggerated the circumstances, that no competent military person that I know would give someone a Silver Star for shooting a kid in the back, although I dont find anything wrong with that.
Im saying, with respect to his Purple Hearts, two of the three of them, all you need to do is look at the paper. He provided falsified paper to get out of Vietnam in a short period.
MATTHEWS: OK, lets listlets go down the list.
Silver Star. Respond to what he said about the Silver Star.
HURLEY: His book and his organization is built on lies and distortions.
John McCain had it absolutely right when he said, Chris, when he said it is dishonorable and dishonest what Mr. ONeills organization is doing. Theyre taking and distorting the facts. Theyre in writing from 1969. If you look at those award recommendations, if you look at those fitness reports, if you go back and talk to the people who were actually there, there is no question and no dispute about John Kerrys heroism in Vietnam. And this now is a Republican-backed, Republican-funded...
MATTHEWS: OK, lets go through some oflets go. I wanted to go through this logically. But now that youve raised this, his shipmates, are they all with Kerry in terms of what happened? Not the politics, who is voting for him. I dont care, could care less. Are they all with him on the facts?
HURLEY: Every man who was with him when he won the Silver Star, when he won the Bronze Star, when he won three Purple Hearts is with him.
MATTHEWS: Is that true?
ONEILL: Absolutely false.
MATTHEWS: Who among the people with him on that ship disagree with his record?
ONEILL: First of all...
MATTHEWS: On the ship.
ONEILL: Well, his first Purple Heart was not on a ship. It was on a Boston whaler.
MATTHEWS: Right.
ONEILL: With him on the Boston whaler was Lieutenant William Schachte, now Rear Admiral William Schachte. He will tell you that he falsified that award, that the award was forged.
MATTHEWS: Answer?
HURLEY: This is dishonest.
There were three men on that boat that night, John Kerry, Bill Zaladonis, Pat Runyon, period, three men on that boat. This is part of irresponsible journalism, irresponsible reporting. There was no one else on that boat that night. And those men will tell you exactly what happened that night.
MATTHEWS: What happened?
HURLEY: They went into an inlet where they had been advised that there were V.C. using a crossing to traffic in contraband. They went in. They towed a number of fishermen and sampans out to a swift boat. The Boston whaler is a very small boat. Its a 14-to-15-foot boat. There were three of them in it. They went in under power, at some point, cut the engine and paddled in.
They encountered V.C.they encountered Vietnamese fishermen, towed them back out to the swift boat for interrogation. On one trip in, the final trip in, they spotted V.C. crossing this inlet where they were told there would be V.C. Kerry popped the flare, exposing their position. The V.C. began to run. They opened fire on the V.C. As they were exiting the inlet, Kerry feltthere was an explosion in the water and Kerry felt a stinging, burning sensation in his arm. There was no fourth person.
MATTHEWS: Who put him up for the Purple Heart?
HURLEY: It is a function of getting medical treatment for that injury. He was treated the next day, the next morning at Cam Rahn Bay for that injury. They removed shrapnel from his arm. And by virtue of that medical treatment, he received the Purple Heart.
MATTHEWS: How do you know that?
HURLEY: Because thats the...
MATTHEWS: How do you know he had shrapnel removed from his arm?
ONEILL: Because the medical report says removed shrapnel from his arm.
MATTHEWS: What about that, John?
HURLEY: And the fourth person on this boat is a dishonest and ridiculous attempt.
ONEILL: We have just called the No. 2 guy in the Judge Advocate Generals Corps a liar.
Now, lets deal with how he got the Purple Heart. His commanding officer was a man named Grant Hibbard. He has provided an affidavit. Kerry went in to Grant Hibbard and said, Im entitled to a Purple Heart. Grant Hibbard, the division commander said, forget it. Youre not getting any Purple Heart. There wasnt any hostile fire and you have got a scratch here. Im not giving you any Purple Heart.
The hostile fire report, Chris, exists for every other Purple Heart ever issued in Vietnam. There also is a casualty report.
MATTHEWS: OK, look, we have got two other Purple Hearts to deal with. Well be right back. We have got two Purple Hearts, a Bronze Star, and a Silver.
Lets all come back and talk about it.
Were coming back with John ONeill and John Hurley.
Dont forget, you can keep up with the presidential race on HardBlogger, our election blog Web site. Just go to HARDBALL.MSNBC.com.
Youre watching HARDBALL on MSNBC.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
MATTHEWS: Coming up, the debate continues over John Kerrys war record with two Vietnam veterans, longtime Kerry rival John ONeill and the national director of Veterans For Kerry, John Hurley.
HARDBALL back after this.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
MATTHEWS: Were back with John ONeill, co-author of Unfit For Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry, and John Hurley, national director of Veterans For Kerry.
Lets go to that other medal, because I want to be somewhat analytical here, the Bronze.
Why did he get Bronze?
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: John Hurley first.
ONEILL: Chris, we didnt finish on thatI didnt give you the rest of the story on that first Purple Heart.
MATTHEWS: OK. Finish up.
ONEILL: It was denied by the division commander. After everybody left Vietnam, somehow it mysteriously appears three months later without any of the supporting documents, with no hostile fire report, no casualty report.
MATTHEWS: OK, lets go to the Bronze.
HURLEY: If Mr. ONeill was interested in the truth, the Swift Boat Veterans For Truth, if he was interested in the truth, he would have tried to talk to any of John Kerrys crewmates for this book. He did not talk to John Kerrys crewmates.
MATTHEWS: Is that true?
ONEILL: None of his crewmates could have told me anything about the first Purple Heart.
HURLEY: Did you interview
(CROSSTALK)
HURLEY: ... for the book?
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Heres an interesting thing. There seems to be three broad directions of criticism and support for Kerry.
One is, the Navy gave him the Silver. The Navy gave him the Bronze. The Navy gave him three Purple Hearts. So the Navy, as is the Navy, theres the right way, the wrong way, and the Navy way. The Navy way was to give him these awards, OK? We all agree on that because thats a fact.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: The second group of people that the president him, the second force, is his crewmen. Now, theres this other force, people who are not his crewmen, who are not the Navy, who have contributed to your book. What is this about? Why are there three different points of view here, the official Navy way, his crew backing him up? And youve arranged it. Youve pulled together these people from all over the place who dont like the guy.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Seriously, does anybody in your group like John Kerry and wish they didnt have to do this?
ONEILL: Oh, all of them. Virtually everybody would be much happier...
MATTHEWS: They like him?
ONEILL: ... not to be involved in this at all, Chris.
And I disagree completely with what you just said.
MATTHEWS: OK. Explain it.
ONEILL: Its peculiar mathematics that takes eight people and makes them larger than 254 people.
MATTHEWS: Because they were his crewmen.
ONEILL: We dont count that way.
Yes, but these are little boats, Chris. These guysthe officers are bunking with him most nights.
MATTHEWS: I see.
ONEILL: These are little boats operating in groups of six.
Chris, theyre no further than I am from that monitor over there much of the time.
MATTHEWS: Yes.
ONEILL: And youre talking about 17 of the 23 guys that were his direct peers. Youre talking about all the guys who were his commanding officers, or almost all of them.
MATTHEWS: Yes.
ONEILL: Youre talking about most of the guys, the sailors who were right there with him, 60 out of 100. Theyre not in this deal because of anything other than trying to get to the truth.
MATTHEWS: OK, explain this, because I know most officers are probably Republicans from the Vietnam era. I dont deny that, not all of them, most of them.
The crewmen, I still dont understand why you cant explain to me why the crewmen who served with him are up on the stage with him at the Democratic Convention. The Navy has not retracted these medals. The crewmen are with him. And youre saying, ignore the Navy. Ignore the crew. Go with my crowd.
ONEILL: Not at all. Im saying, consider the Navy, consider the crew, and then consider the real facts, actually look at the documents.
HURLEY: Chris, this is wrong.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Let me get John Hurley.
Run through everything. What is this about, this attack?
HURLEY: This is about a Republican smear campaign sponsored by Republican fund raisers down in Texas, supported by Merrie Spaeth, the Republican communicationsthis has got nothing to do with John Kerrys service in Vietnam, which is documented in documents written in 1969, is supported by every member who served with him on those crews.
Now, 35 years after the fact, crewmatesor people, swifties in Vietnam are coming forward, saying, ah, but I remember it differently now.
Let me read to you. This is from one of those commanders that Mr.
ONeill is talking about.
MATTHEWS: Sure.
HURLEY: This is from George Elliott, one of John Kerrys commanders in Vietnam. This is the recommendation for the award of the Bronze Star. And he talks about a little bit in this.
Then he says: Shortly after starting their exit from this river, a mine detonated under one of the boats, PCF-3, lifting it two feet above the water and wounded everyone on board. Almost simultaneously, another mine detonated, close aboard PCF-94, knocking First Lieutenant Rassmann into the water and wounding Lieutenant J.G. Kerry in the right arm. It goes on that PCF-4 provided cover fire, that they received sniper fire from the riverbanks. Lieutenant J.G. Kerry, from his exposed position on the bow of the boat, managed to pull Lieutenant Rassmann aboard despite the painful wound in his right arm.
Meanwhile, PCF-94 gunners provided accurate suppressing fire. It concludes by saying: Lieutenant J.G. Kerry proved himself to be calm, professional and highly courageous in the face of enemy fire. That is signed by George Elliott, one of these same guys now who is saying, oh, but I remember it differently and I want to change my mind.
What is specious about this book, what is dishonest about this book, what John McCain is getting at when he says its dishonest and dishonorable, is that Mr. ONeill and his co-author, Mr. Corsi, did not talk to one member of John Kerrys crew on that boat. If they were interested in the truth, they would have talked with Jim Rassmann. They would have talked with Fred Short.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Did you?
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: Actually, we did. We interviewed
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: May I finish?
HURLEY: Private investigator, right?
ONEILL: We had a private investigator, specifically to check this out, interview three of the crewmen. They confirmed to us that this Cambodia story was a lie.
MATTHEWS: OK. Well come back.
HURLEY: And then they were instructed not to talk to us anymore.
ONEILL: Thats a lie. Thats an outright lie.
ONEILL: They were instructed specifically not to talk to us.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: Were coming back with John ONeill and John Hurley.
And sign up for HARDBALLs free daily e-mail briefing. Just log on to our Web site, HARDBALL.MSNBC.com.
Youre watching it, HARDBALL, on MSNBC.
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)
MATTHEWS: Were back with John ONeill, the co-author of Unfit For Command, and John Hurley, national director of Veterans For Kerry.
Gentlemen, first of all, according to this Associated Press story, Kerry got a Purple Heart for getting shrapnel in his left arm above the elbow. If the shrapnel had hit him in the eye, the doctor said it could have blinded him. No. 2, he was wounded with a piece of shrapnel on February 20, this time in the left thigh. Doctors decided to leave the shrapnel in placeit is still in his legrather than make a wider opening to remove it.
The third time, he got it from a dangerous situation in March of that year, life-threatening. A mine exploded near Kerrys swift boat and enemy snipers were shooting around him. He won the Silver Star for chasingbeaching his swift boat, chasing after some V.C. in V.C. territory and killing one of the V.C. He won his Bronze for saving the life of Mr. Rassmann, as he pulled him into the boat in enemy territory.
I dont get the point. If this is all roughly true, why are youit
is allwhat is in dispute here, besides
(CROSSTALK)
HURLEY: Every word of it is true.
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: All of this is true. And youre building a case against the guy on behalf of a guy running for president with absolutely no military experience in the field. So what is the point?
ONEILL: First of all, when you start off with the assumption everything is true and refuse to allow it to be questioned...
MATTHEWS: No, I listened to every point you made, but the main point...
ONEILL: You havent let me talk about most of them. We talked about his first Purple...
MATTHEWS: You talked about each one.
ONEILL: His first Purple...
MATTHEWS: One of the oldest tricks on this show is for somebody to come on the show after talking for 20 minutes and say they havent had the chance to talk.
ONEILL: Well, the first...
MATTHEWS: Ill be glad to clock you, John...
ONEILL: OK.
MATTHEWS: ... on how many minutes you spoke on the show. So dont try that old trick. It is a particularly conservative trick, OK?
So lets move on here.
What is the main thrust of it? Youre saying that all of this is smoke, the guy is not a hero.
ONEILL: Youre right. Im saying...
MATTHEWS: All smoke?
ONEILL: Im saying that the third Purple Heart was another self-inflicted wound. Im saying he lied about the Bronze Star. And Im saying that you, Chris, could read the documents yourself, if you would take the time.
MATTHEWS: And his crewmen back him up and the Navy backs him up.
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: Wrong.
MATTHEWS: And youre its all...
ONEILL: Wrong, Chris. The Navy, his actual commanders, virtually all say that those awards were improperly issued.
MATTHEWS: Why am I reading these citations all day from the Navy?
What are you talking about? They dont exist?
ONEILL: Well, wait just a second. What youve done is...
MATTHEWS: I read the citation for the Bronze. I read it for the Silver. Ive studied up on the Purples. And youre saying all this is smoke, that hes not really a hero of any kind.
(CROSSTALK)
ONEILL: Can you tell me, Chris, where the numerically superior force was that was pouring intense fire from one Viet Cong kid with a gunboat? And so it existed only in his report.
MATTHEWS: OK, your last thought.
(CROSSTALK)
HURLEY: John Kerry served heroically. He served courageously. He made wonderful decision-making in Vietnam, saved his crew on a number of occasions. They have his full and complete support. He was recognized by his commanders in Vietnam, particularly Commander Elliott, who said, in a combat situation, John Kerry was unsurpassed.
This now, 35 years later, is, as John McCain said, dishonest and dishonorable. It is a Republican-inspired smear campaign.
MATTHEWS: Well, Ive already heard enough that hes done more than I ever did for my country and a lot more than anybody else.
Thank you very much, John ONeilland more than the president.
And, John Hurley, thank you for joining us.
"and more than the president."
-- And there it is.
Chris Matthews is still a Carter stooge.
How do you like that? Oneill voted for Gore in 2000. The Media still doesn't get it. Oneill is serious about Kerry being unfit for command.
And his gratuitous slap at the President as they closed the segment was absolutely outrageous.
Carvell/O'Neil link has the transcript posted from CNN...here it is.
http://www.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0408/12/cf.00.html
I think Chris Matthews must be John Kerry's boy toy. Move over Jim McGreevey... you've got company.
I particularly resented Matthews setting himself up as a naval expert based on what his brother did. I believe Mr. O'Neill is a Naval Academy graduate.
I can't read it - my blood pressure is still up from watching it live....
After reading all the posts last night, I stayed up and watched the entire interview. It went from bad to worse, but frankly I though O'Neill comported himself just fine and won the entire exchange.
Matthew's was vicious throughout, particularly at the end.
for later
ONEILL: You havent let me talk about most of them. We talked about his first Purple...
MATTHEWS: You talked about each one.
ONEILL: His first Purple...
MATTHEWS: One of the oldest tricks on this show is for somebody to come on the show after talking for 20 minutes and say they havent had the chance to talk.
ONEILL: Well, the first...
MATTHEWS: Ill be glad to clock you, John...
ONEILL: OK.
MATTHEWS: ... on how many minutes you spoke on the show. So dont try that old trick. It is a particularly conservative trick, OK?
The fact that Matthews pretends to be a journalist rather than a Democrat stooge is hilarious.
I know how you feel. I had to calm down for a half hour last night to get to sleep.
I watched the 11 o'clock rerun.
Matthews is a slimeball.
Lucky for John Hurley Chris Matthews did all the defending. Hurley's only replies were "That's a lie.". Oneill then comes back with the facts proving it is not a lie. Hurley then moves on to the "These guys are Republicans.".
Matthews did repeatedly interrupt Oneill throughout the show. Most of the occasions it was right before a commercial break.
What an OUTRAGEOUS statement to make!!! John Kerry has done more for this country than a President who has lead us to victory in TWO WARS???!!!!
Chris was frantic and incredibly rude. Towards the end he was really loosing it. IMHO he is frightened of what ONeill has to say.
That is a classic excerpt.
Dear Chris Mathews, I am stunned at your treatment of Mr. O'Neill on your show tonight. I have always respected you and your show, and I am completely shocked and dismayed after watching your show tonight. I am a Navy Vietnam combat Veteran. I served on the Mekong Delta 1970 - 1971. I know a little bit about what went on over there, back then. Apparently you did not take the time to examine any of the documents that support Mr. O'Neill's position prior to your interview with him. You have done the Veterans of this country a grave disservice by not treating Mr. O'Neill's position regarding Kerry with at least a modicum of respect. You owe Mr. O'Neill a return invitation to your show, and you owe your audience the professionalism of at least being aware of the subject matter. Remember, it was KERRY that made his Vietnam service the cornerstone of his presidential candidacy, and it was Kerry that invited us to examine his record. Then when presented with an examination of his record (which you apparently did not even take the time to review), you threw it away like so much trash without even giving it a fair hearing. Mr. Mathews, this is an important issue to Vietnam Veterans. The facts that the Swift Boat Vets for the Truth have about Kerry's Vietnam service, and his Jane Fonda / John Kerry actions following his return needs to be told in an honest debate. The American people deserve to know the truth. After all, Kerry is the one that asked for an examination of his record to occur. The slam -job that you did to Mr. O'Neill was disgraceful, and I am hurt by your actions. I hope that you take my comments with the honest respect that they are given. Sincerely, Real name here
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.