Posted on 08/06/2004 6:47:56 AM PDT by mhking
There they go again. Devoid of ideas, running from the record of failure on the economy and national security, President Bush and his campaign are going negative again, trying to label John Kerry rather than level with Americans.
Now the refrain is that Kerry and Edwards are too ''liberal'' for America. Democrats tend to duck when such charges are leveled. Clinton dressed up as a ''New Democrat,'' trying to separate himself rhetorically. Reformers now call themselves ''progressives,'' trying to avoid the label. Frankly, I think it's time for people to stand up.
Think about it: A conservative Christian is a contradiction in terms. Christ wasn't a conservative. He fed the hungry simply because they were hungry. He didn't require that they go to work first. He healed the sick, simply because they were sick. He didn't push them into an insurance company, or let the drug companies gouge them on prices. Jesus was a liberal; Herod was the conservative.
Moses was the liberal; Pharaoh was the conservative. Abolitionists were liberals; slave owners were the conservatives. Mandela is a liberal; the South African apartheid leaders were the conservatives. That's why conservative Dick Cheney supported apartheid over Mandela, and approved of keeping Mandela in prison.
The Suffragettes were liberals; those who opposed the vote for women were conservatives. Martin Luther King was a liberal; the segregationists were conservatives. He wanted to end racial discrimination; they wanted to conserve it.
Advocates of national health care are liberals; George W. Bush, the HMOs and drug companies are the conservatives. They profit from the current system and want to conserve it from reforms that would make health care affordable for all Americans.
America was a liberal idea. Washington and Jefferson were the liberals; King George was the conservative. America was founded on the proposition that ''We the people'' were endowed with inalienable rights -- including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. And when oppressed by an unjust ruler, we had the right to declare our independence and establish our own form of government.
And America was built by liberals -- by dissenters, by those persecuted for their religion or their race. The Statute of Liberty doesn't say, ''Send me your privileged, your wealthy, your powerful yearning to conserve their fortunes.'' It says, ''Send me your tired, your poor, your humble yearning to breathe free.''
Today the choices are equally clear. Bush and Cheney argue for tax cuts for the wealthy; they want to consolidate the wealth and power of the ''have mores'' that the president calls ''my base.''
Liberals are for rolling back tax cuts for the rich and investing in education so every child gets a fair shot. Conservatives would conserve the two Americas: one system of education, health care and retirement security for the powerful, and one for the rest of us. Liberals would make certain that everyone has the right to a high-quality education, to affordable health care, to a decent retirement.
Bush wants to cut guaranteed benefits under Social Security while privatizing it; liberals want to save Social Security so that all Americans have a basic floor beneath their feet.
Bush is against a minimum wage; liberals want to raise the minimum wage. Bush wants to weaken the 40-hour week and reduce those eligible for overtime; liberals want to make certain workers get paid overtime if they have to work more than 40 hours a week.
You can pick your side -- liberal or conservative, for change or for the status quo, for the poor or for the privileged. For me, I stand with Christ against Herod; Moses against the Pharaoh; the abolitionists against the slaveholders; King against the segregationists, the Suffragettes against the male politicians; the many against the few, and liberals against this crowd in the White House.
But whatever you choose, the next time Bush and Cheney rail about Kerry being too liberal, remember that America was a liberal idea from the start.
While we can figure out why Jesse Jackson might write such a hate filled screed, I do not understand why a newspaper would consent to publish such divisive and revisionist historical trash.
The left likes to draw comparisons between homosexual "oppression" and segregation.
They are unwilling to see any similarities between the abolitionist movement and the pro-life/anti-abortion movement.
For anyone to even think Jesse knows Jesus is beyond belief. This sounds like Conservatism to me.
2 Thessalonians 3
10 For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat.
11 For we hear that there are some which walk among you disorderly, working not at all, but are busybodies.
--
Ask any PolySci instructor which side believes that man is inherently good (liberals) and which side believes man is inherently evil (conservatives).
Which side do you think Jesus took?
For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. (2 Cor. 5:21),
I would just like to add the following:
Matthew 7:15-20 and Matthew 7:21-23
Our Lord Himself describes what 'ole JJ is all about.
Then what are black conservatives , chopped liver?
Liberals are ignorant take a look at the Canadian government. He would fit quite well with them.
Liberals want to limit free speech. They don't respect Christians in anyway.
This is the same type of logic that says all Blacks born in America must have a samll 'D' stamped on their birth certificates or the parents leave them in the hospital.
...It's high time Jesse gave it up. His arguments are old and tired--just like he is.
-Regards, T.
samll=small
Wait one seconds here Je$$e. Weren't Washington and Jefferson slave owner? Now they are liberals?
I struggled to find words with which to post, but thankfully, you've summed it up perfectly.
I believe Jesus was a compassionate conservative.
Welcome and good points!
Smeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeearrrrrrrrrr!!!
Yes, let's make health care affordable...through competition. Wanna bet Jesse wants to mandate affordability, and thus risk making health care scarce???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.