Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Democrats use 12-year-olds
townhall.com ^ | 8/03/04 | Dennis Prager

Posted on 08/02/2004 9:55:46 PM PDT by kattracks

After spending the week at the Democratic National Convention broadcasting my radio show, it was not easy to choose which aspect of the convention I would devote my column to. Would it be the discussions I had with delegates, nearly all of whom I liked and none of whom thought clearly about our nation's issues? Or about the Potemkin Village the Democrats erected -- a convention where almost nothing the Democrats really believe was on display?

I decided on the speech given during prime time by a 12-year-old girl from the San Francisco Bay Area. In my view, this talk was typically and uniquely Democratic.

To understand modern liberalism and its political party, it is vital to understand Democrats' desire to blur any distinctions between child and adult. Ever since the 1960s, liberalism has been largely a movement dominated by children (of every age).
I enjoyed meeting Democrats last week. Many are people I would be happy to have as neighbors. But compared to Republicans, liberals and Democrats are often adults who do not wish to grow up. When George W. Bush was elected, I felt as if adults would now run the country after the adolescent-like President Clinton.

Liberals and Democrats are not comfortable with adult-child distinctions. They therefore frequently treat and regard children as adults and frequently treat and regard adults as children.

That is why liberals do not generally want children to call adults "Mr." or "Mrs."
Such titles render adults distinct from children.

That is why liberal teachers often dress and talk similarly to their students and ask to be called by their first names.

That is why liberals led the fight to lower the voting age to 18 and why California Democrats are now seeking to lower it further (as low as 14).

That is why liberal educators worked to enable students to design college curricula. To many liberals, a 55-year-old professor does not know anything more than a 20-year-old about what students should be studying.

That is why liberals don't worry about protecting children's innocence as much as conservatives do. The early sexualization of children is therefore not a problem to liberal educators. In a nutshell, the differing views of childhood innocence are what the battles over sex education in elementary schools, condom distribution in high schools and AIDS education in fourth grade are all about.

It is therefore not surprising that the Democrats invited a 12-year-old girl to address their convention.

First, the politicization of children is no more a problem to most Democrats and liberals than is children's sexualization.

Second, for many liberals, there is just as much to be learned about politics and society from children as from adults. The notion that wisdom accrues with age is generally alien to liberals. So why not have a 12-year-old share her own wisdom with a convention and nation of adults?

Third, it is illuminating to note what the 12-year-old said that evoked the loudest cheers from the Democratic delegates. In the words of the Oakland Tribune, "The show-stealer was Oakland's Ilana Wexler, 12, who brought down the house with her suggestion that Vice President Dick Cheney get a 'timeout' for using foul language.
Within hours she became an international star, media outlets clamoring for her attention, fans seeking her autograph."

The Democrats went crazy over the girl because she not only shattered the adult-child social distinction, she did so with regard to an adult of immense prominence and status, the vice president of the United States.

Listening to a 12-year-old publicly mock the Republican vice president of the United States brought Democrats almost orgasmic pleasure, especially since no Democrats had the courage to do so in their speeches.

Of course, this girl has accomplished nothing compared to Dick Cheney. She has no wisdom, no humility and no knowledge beyond the leftist platitudes spoon-fed by her parents and schools. She is a mere child, more foolish than most, in that she actually thinks she has earned the right to publicly ridicule the vice president of the United States.

The Democratic Party is as shameless as it is immature.

Shameless in its exploitation of children. And shameless in its hypocrisy. The Democratic candidate for president, John Kerry, used the same "f-word" in a public interview in Rolling Stone magazine -- a far more serious matter than using it privately.

And that is why a 12-year-old know-it-all stole the Democrats' show.

©2004 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Contact Dennis Prager | Read Prager's biography



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dncconvention; ilanawexler; kerry; kidsforkerry; liberals; prager
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 08/02/2004 9:55:48 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks

What can I say? They are a party of desperation. They would pimp-out their mama for one more vote.


2 posted on 08/02/2004 9:59:30 PM PDT by no dems (Stupid people get on my nerves; for real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Those who aspire to do all "for the children" will apparently not hesitate to use the children as their tools to obtain power. Did they tell this young thing that while she asked Dick Cheney to take a "time-out" for using a very naughty word, that her hero, J(anus) F(aced)Kerry used it in discussing polictics with "Rolling Stone" and authorized them to print it? Did they truly believe that those few undecideds would be swayed by this child?


3 posted on 08/02/2004 10:03:06 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Didn't Jimmy Carter consult with his daughter?


4 posted on 08/02/2004 10:05:26 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

This kid was asked if it Teresa Heinz-Kerry's use of the phrase "shove it" was bad, too, and she said it was - but that Heinz-Kerry shouldn't get a "time-out" because she is a Democrat.

She has the Democrats' general philosophy down, I'll say that for her.


5 posted on 08/02/2004 10:07:45 PM PDT by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet (Some of my best friends are white, middle-class males.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Terrorists use children too. It is an act of desperation.

Hail to the King Baby.

6 posted on 08/02/2004 10:07:52 PM PDT by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
"Didn't Jimmy Carter consult with his daughter?" BWRAAHAHA HA HA HA HA
7 posted on 08/02/2004 10:09:07 PM PDT by Viet-Boat-Rider (KERRY LIED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Video of the Wexler kid. Notice she has been indoctrinated to cheat "to make up for Florida".
8 posted on 08/02/2004 10:18:53 PM PDT by DocRock (Check my homepage for more "home movies" of the Kerry campaign)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
When I first heard the audio clip on the radio, I thought it was from The Brady Bunch or something. When I listened to the content, I realized it had to be recent, but the voice and diction reminded me of the show (not that I particularly watched it; it may be that it wasn't a good match but just matched some snippet I remembered from somewhere).
9 posted on 08/02/2004 10:22:10 PM PDT by supercat (If Kerry becomes President, nothing bad will happen for which he won't have an excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
That is why liberals led the fight to lower the voting age to 18 and why California Democrats are now seeking to lower it further (as low as 14).

Raising the voting age to 25 and requiring voters to pass a short and simple muliptle choice test on American history and the Constitution would doom the leftist cause for good.

10 posted on 08/02/2004 10:22:11 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Last convention the Dems booed a whole bunch of 12-year-olds: Scouts.


11 posted on 08/02/2004 10:23:25 PM PDT by jwalburg (Hatriots for Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Prager has more wisdom in his pinky than the entire DNC combined !


12 posted on 08/02/2004 10:25:17 PM PDT by Freesofar ( No one ever wants to go to war,.... But " when we have to" is a matter of policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Excellent observations by Prager, as usual.

The Wexler girl would have fit right in as one of the Midwich Cuckoos.


13 posted on 08/02/2004 10:42:33 PM PDT by fizziwig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Liberals have the mentality of children. Conservatives have the mindset of adults. I suspect much of the anger and hate liberals have for President Bush is he says they can't have everything they want and that makes them only madder.


14 posted on 08/02/2004 11:12:30 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Bump for later read.


15 posted on 08/02/2004 11:24:01 PM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Liberals have the mentality of children. Conservatives have the mindset of adults. I suspect much of the anger and hate liberals have for President Bush is he says they can't have everything they want and that makes them only madder.


Excellent observation. I can just picture Franken clenching his fists, shaking them up and down, and pursing his lips.
Moore on the other hand would take a deep breath blow his cheeks out, and turn his face red. And Hillary would do what she does best. SSSCCRREEEEEEETCH



16 posted on 08/02/2004 11:28:35 PM PDT by mountn man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jwalburg

that's because even one 12 year old Scout has more maturity than all democrats combined


17 posted on 08/02/2004 11:33:17 PM PDT by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arielb

The libs never grow up. If they do, they become conservatives.


18 posted on 08/02/2004 11:35:28 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

I also wonder if she admonishes her fellow upper middle class schoolmates at her elite private school when THEY spew foul language-and you can believe many of them DO!
Wonder also if Little Miss Perfect lets fly a few F words out on the playground herself.
Riverman


19 posted on 08/02/2004 11:58:36 PM PDT by Riverman94610
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

That's why the next gen will be more conservative; kids want discipline, guidance, and simplicity; they aren't getting it from the looney left.


20 posted on 08/03/2004 5:06:58 AM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson