Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Moore, Bill O'Reilly Square Off In Televised Debate
MTV ^ | July 28, 04 | MTV

Posted on 07/28/2004 1:19:49 PM PDT by churchillbuff

Some of the most heated political rhetoric televised on Tuesday came not from a speech made at the Democratic National Convention, but from a FOX News studio.

After running into one another outside of the Democratic National Convention in Boston, Michael Moore finally agreed to step into the ring with Bill O'Reilly for the first time since the release of his controversial documentary, "Fahrenheit 9/11."

Left-wing rabble-rouser Moore and right-wing conservative O'Reilly sparred on FOX News' "The O'Reilly Factor" on Tuesday in an unedited interview taped on Monday. During the 12-minute interview, the two debated heated topics including President Bush's motivation for going to war, whether the United States should pull out of Iraq, and how to bring democracy to a dictatorship.

O'Reilly kick-started the interview, telling Moore that many politicians believe Bush was misinformed about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, and that he was not lying. "You want to apologize to the president now or later?" O'Reilly asked.

"Actually," Moore countered, "it's President Bush that needs to apologize to the nation for telling an entire country that there were weapons of mass destruction, that they had evidence of this, and that there was some connection between Saddam Hussein and September 11."

During the interview, O'Reilly referred to Moore as "President Moore" and called him Saddam Hussein's "biggest defender in the media." Each discussion hit a brick wall over issues of semantics. "It's not a lie if you believe it to be true," O'Reilly said.

"Bill, I can't think of a worse thing to do than to lie to a country to take them to war," Moore insisted. "He did not tell the truth."

Moore continuously asked O'Reilly the question he posed to a series of senators in "Fahrenheit 9/11": whether he would sacrifice his own child for the Iraqi city of Fallujah.

"I would sacrifice myself," O'Reilly said.

The question was revisited several times during the interview, and each time, O'Reilly explained that he would send himself, but did not say whether he would send his child.

Concluding a meandering discussion on how to properly introduce democracy to a dictatorship, O'Reilly began to close the discussion, saying he was glad they had the interview, and discovered that they see the world in different ways.

"Right," Moore said. "I would not sacrifice my child to secure Fallujah and ... you would?"

"I would sacrifice myself," O'Reilly said.

"Where can we sign him up?" Moore exclaimed, to which O'Reilly responded, "You'd love to get rid of me."

"No," Moore said softly, extending his hand slightly across the table. "I want you to live. I want you to live."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: dncconvention; kerry; moore; oreilly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: armydoc

"MM insisted that Bush lied about WMD's because, even though Bush acted on info he thought to be true (as confirmed by the 9/11 commission), it still wasn't "truthful" information. Why, oh why, didn't O'Rielly counter with, "then Kerry and Clinton lied as well? They both told the public about Saddam's WMD's." Seemed like a no-brainer."

RIGHT!

MM was a target as fat as a barn door (or his a**) and OReilly took maybe half the shots he could have.
he was a bit passive and let the WMD issue dominate the debate, when in fact there are many reasons for the war, like terror links, which Moore didnt even have a clue about! OReilly could have nailed him on that:
"So the 911 commission says that Iraq offered safe haven to Bin laden in 1998, doesnt that indicate some links between saddam and bin laden?"
"So the 911 commision says the patriot act is a great benefit to America, agree?"
(getting moore to dispute the *War on Terror* would nail him as the kook that he is. WMDs not being in Iraq is the only non-kooky element to hang his whole worldview on. the rest is cr*pola.)


61 posted on 07/28/2004 2:50:15 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: M. Peach

Actually BOR tried that hypothetical, but it was clearly too complex a thought process for Michael Moore, who just went on to spout his next lie.

BOR needed to be more 'no-spin' aggressive to quit Moore's slithering.


62 posted on 07/28/2004 2:52:02 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

"It was a TKO with O'Reilly flat out on the canvas."

how so? Moore was a liar who admitted he wouldnt even take out the taliban, he didnt know saddam had links to terrorists, he calls our heros in uniform 'child'.

So Moore showed himself to be a moron and a liar.


63 posted on 07/28/2004 2:54:23 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
how so?

For the many many reasons listed on this thread. They echo my feelings. Moore had control. O'Reilly crapped his pants.

64 posted on 07/28/2004 2:59:47 PM PDT by Jenya (Gore, he's a real nowhere man, sitting in his nowhere land, making all his nowhere plans for nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
When Robert Bloch wrote his novel PSYCHO the discription of Norman Bates fit Michael Moore to a T.

WOW. That's interesting............and frightening.

65 posted on 07/28/2004 3:02:58 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Conservomax
A lot of those guys dying over there are my age and I'm not a f***ing child.

I have a "child" serving in Iraq. He's 29 years old.

Screen name: smaagee

That's my boy!

66 posted on 07/28/2004 3:08:33 PM PDT by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jenya

I saw the interview too. I wrote on the thread that BOR should have been hader on his lies.

But any semi-informed person could see right through Moore's bluster as hollow and ignorant. He was not convincing at all. "Controlling" an interview means nothing if it just exposes you as a moron. That is what happened in the interview.

Moore could have been exposed even more had BOR been more aggressive, but he didnt come off well at all.


67 posted on 07/28/2004 3:10:42 PM PDT by WOSG (George W Bush - Right for our Times!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

I think the trouble with the interview was that O'Reilly was so anxious to get Moore on his show for ratings purposes that he accepted Moore's demand that the interview be done immediately. Fox hyped the show like CRAZY. O'Reilly had no time to really prepare his "cross-examination". He should have had quotes to display, video of the 9/11 commissioners to play, quotes or video of the Butler report, Kerry, Clinton, HRC, Edwards, etc. disputing Moore's accusations, quotes from Moore's books showing him to be anti-American, etc. Television is a visual medium and O'Reilly could have shown him to be a liar and propagandist if he prepared. Instead it was Bill's word against Moore's with nothing to show the audience to dispute Moore's claims. Preparation is everything. Bill went for the ratings and not the Knock Out, and it showed. He BLEW IT!!


68 posted on 07/28/2004 3:22:44 PM PDT by Niks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Why on earth doesn't somebody (anybody) ask the Michigan Manatee if Clinton, Berger, Gore and Albright were lying when they said Saddam had these weapons. If Bush was guilty of telling a lie about the WMD, he was guilty of repeating a lie that CLINTON INVENTED!
69 posted on 07/28/2004 3:25:29 PM PDT by cookcounty (LBJ sent him to VN. Nixon expressed him home. And JfK's too dumb to tell them apart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

After that interview, if O'Reilly was a race horse, he'd have to be put down.


70 posted on 07/28/2004 3:29:37 PM PDT by anonymous_user (<a href="http://www.michaelmoorehatesamerica.com" target="_blank">Michael Moore</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItsOurTimeNow

right-wing conservative O'Reilly

Actually, O'Reilly is a self-described independent.


71 posted on 07/28/2004 3:34:46 PM PDT by gimme1ibertee (Liberalism=insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff

Some of us at work thought O'Reilly was holding back. I wish he had informed Moore that he wouldn't send anybody to Iraq that didn't willingly join the service. Evidently Moore forgot that this is a VOLUNTEER military nowadays and the draft is a thing of the past. Nobody who is in the service was FORCED to sign up. Why didn't O'Reilly let him have it with both barrels?


72 posted on 07/28/2004 3:58:25 PM PDT by Old Grumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spodefly
blowhard v. blowhard

I can't decide whether Moore or O'Reilly is more deserving of this special little gift.

73 posted on 07/28/2004 4:30:57 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Its always best to get out of the way of an idiot. Let them dig there own hole. If O'Reilly challenged every syllable, Moore would have been more careful or completely shut up.
74 posted on 07/28/2004 4:53:12 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
OReilly should have been ready with a better answer to the 'would you send your child to die?' Q. He asked that in F911.

Yeah. That's where it really fell apart.

Don't call Michael Moore if your house is burning.

75 posted on 07/28/2004 4:55:31 PM PDT by GVnana (Tagline? I don't need no steenkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis

"Any man who purposely goes out of his way to appear grubby, unshaven and poorly dressed in 100% of his public appearances has deep psychological problems.
Those who admire such a person likely suffer similar self image afflictions."

EXACTLY! What is it with Democrats and trying to look cheap when everyone knows damn well they have plenty of money to spare? It's like the digital watch thing. Clinton wore a digital watch, so now Edwards and KERRY (!!) wear those devices! It's ridiculous. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's a Democrat thing as I can't recall ever seeing a Republican politician wear one.


76 posted on 07/28/2004 5:05:25 PM PDT by French-American Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Niks

Anyone know where I can get a transcript of the interview?


77 posted on 07/28/2004 5:09:56 PM PDT by French-American Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
MOORE JUST CANCELLED HIS TRIP TO CRAWFORD TEXAS!

Just heard it on FOX. The COWARD backed out. (Possibly due to the pallet of manure left him by a local rancher?)

78 posted on 07/28/2004 5:15:10 PM PDT by GVnana (Tagline? I don't need no steenkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

"..no one "sends their child" to war. its a volunteer military made up of adults."

I think that's an important point lost in Moore's emotional rhetoric, and Bill got caught up in it. No individual wants their son to die. But there are just causes for war. And our country has to have a military that is willing to kill and risk their own lives. And that military has to answer the call of the commander-in-chief.

Either we have a voluntary army, or everyone's son is eligible for the draft. (EVERYONE, no college exemptions!) But no parent is being asked to make the decision for their son to join the military.

-- Joe


79 posted on 07/28/2004 6:17:45 PM PDT by Joe Republc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
As a right-wing conservative, I resent O'Reilly being characterized as such.

So does Bill O'Reilly, who goes out of his way to often repeat that he is not a right wing conservative or even call himself a conservative.

80 posted on 07/28/2004 6:20:16 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson