Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deported, pregnant Mexican woman wants re-entry to U.S., lawyers say fetus is citizen.
San Luis Obispo ^ | Mon, Jul. 26, 2004 | Associated Press

Posted on 07/27/2004 3:33:44 PM PDT by yankeedame

Posted on Mon, Jul. 26, 2004

Pregnant woman wants re-entry to U.S., lawyers say fetus is citizen

Associated Press

LOS ANGELES - Lawyers for a deported Mexican woman who is eight months pregnant are seeking her return to the United States to protect the unborn baby's health. They also say under federal law the fetus is a viable human being and thus may be eligible for citizenship rights.

That argument sounds like a long shot to some on both sides of the immigration debate. But in May, a U.S. District Court judge in Kansas City, Mo., approved a stay of deportation for a pregnant Mexican woman after raising, among other concerns, the question of whether her fetus could be considered a U.S. citizen. The judge is reviewing the issue.

That Missouri decision cannot set legal precedent, but immigration attorneys say it may offer them a new angle in deportation cases.

Last week immigration officials denied a request to grant 30-year-old Maria Christina Rubio, mother of two young U.S.-born daughters, a temporary humanitarian visa to return to the United States because of complications in her pregnancy. Rubio's attorney did not immediately return calls for comment. She was deported July 16.

Her husband's attorney, Luis Carrillo, said he is considering whether to file a lawsuit against Immigration and Customs Enforcement for unlawful deportation.

Carrillo said Rubio, who was hospitalized with complications in her fifth month and has suffered severe stomach pains throughout her pregnancy, needs to be back in the United States because the baby's health is at risk.

He also cited the Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004, in which unborn children are granted equal protection under criminal law. Carrillo said that since the fetus is 8 months and would be viable outside the womb, it should be treated as a child born in the United States.

"The child was conceived in the United States and would have been born in the United States except that the mother was deported. Through no part of his own, the unborn baby is in Mexico," Carrillo said.

Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said the U.S. Constitution's definition of citizen is very clear.

"All persons born or naturalized in the United States" are considered citizens under the 14th Amendment.

"It doesn't say all persons who were conceived in the United States," Kice said.

In the Missouri case, the court questioned whether the unborn child would be a U.S. citizen because its father was.

Lawyers for the U.S. Attorney's office in Missouri argued that while fetuses are protected under criminal law, the law does not restrict the government's immigration powers. Known as "Laci and Conner's Law," - the legislation was enacted after the bodies of Laci Peterson and her unborn son washed up along the San Francisco Bay in 2003. Peterson's husband, Scott, is charged with their murder.

Rubio was deported after she went to what her husband says was to be a status conference on her residency request. Immigration officials say the pregnant Rubio was immediately deported after it was discovered her residency request had been denied two years before and that she had previously entered the country illegally and been deported.

Kice said Rubio's lawyer at the time did not attend the hearing but was reached by telephone and did not raise any concerns about her health. She also said Rubio received an exam from public health services to ensure she was fit to travel.

Alan Diamante, an advising attorney in the case, said he believes it is important to bring the fetus citizenship argument to court, although he acknowledged it may be difficult argument to win.

"You can say this argument is a stretch, but these are the types of arguments that attorneys have to make to get into court," he said. "Laws are always changing and becoming harsher, and immigrant lawyers have to be creative to be heard."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: California
KEYWORDS: aliens; citizenship; fetalrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: yankeedame

Interesting...

If the courts decide that a fetus IS an American citizen, then the fetus IS a person with certain unalienable rights, including life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness...

Meaning that if this decision stands, that abortion would have to be declared murder of an American citizen...

Ohhh... the libs are going to love this one!

Mark


21 posted on 07/27/2004 4:00:26 PM PDT by MarkL (Dude!!! You're farting fire!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

they would consider the fetus a human being so the woman and the baby can be US residents but wont consider a fetus as a human being when it comes to abortion, aint that a bitch


22 posted on 07/27/2004 4:02:42 PM PDT by erik22lax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aetius
Well the Amendment goes on to mention something about 'being subject to the jurisdiction thereof'; so one could make the argument that children born to illegal aliens shouldn't get automatic citizenship because as a child of a foreign national it is not subject to US jurisdiction. Of course no one is going to make that argument in this politically correct age, but it could be done.

Illegal aliens are "subject to the jurisdiction" of the U.S.-- that's why they can be prosecuted for illegal entry. The Supreme Court, in the Wong Kim Ark case (about 1880, IIRC) said anyone born here is a citizen, except for children of foreign diplomats who have diplomatic immunity. (I agree that illegal immigration wasn't something they were thinking about when they passed the 14th Amendment, but the rule is nonetheless there.)

23 posted on 07/27/2004 4:02:59 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.
What if the woman wanted to stay so she could abort the child at a US hospital...

What on earth would she ever want to do that? If she could manage to give birth on US soil, that baby would be her golden key.

24 posted on 07/27/2004 4:03:34 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
"Deported, pregnant Mexican woman wants re-entry..."

If she could have avoided initial entry, she wouldn't have got knocked up in the first place...

25 posted on 07/27/2004 4:03:54 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack ("We deal in hard calibers and hot lead." - Roland Deschaines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

If the father is a US citizen does that not make the baby so also, regardless of where it's born?


26 posted on 07/27/2004 4:05:46 PM PDT by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Don't waste any of my tax paying money on this one.


27 posted on 07/27/2004 4:06:36 PM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

we're forgetting that libs can have it both ways when it suits them.


28 posted on 07/27/2004 4:07:33 PM PDT by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece-(carry daily;apply sparingly))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
If they administer the citizenship test by ultrasound and he passes...

then let him stay- HE'S A GENIUS!

29 posted on 07/27/2004 4:08:10 PM PDT by mrsmith ("Oyez, oyez! All rise for the Honorable Chief Justice... Hillary Rodham Clinton ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

aaaant... sorry you lose. it doesn't work that way, but thankx for playing

30 posted on 07/27/2004 4:12:58 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
They also say under federal law the fetus is a viable human being and thus may be eligible for citizenship rights.

If citizenship happens at viability which would be something like 6 months gestation --- then all those babies whose mothers made a run for the border after that point --- are citizens of Mexico and should be cut off welfare and deported.

31 posted on 07/27/2004 4:20:20 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame; All
The biggest canard going is that those born here are automatically citizens under the 14th Amendment.

This lady's illegal offspring is not a U.S. Citizen for 2 reasons.


First, even if one accepts the common interpretation of the 14th Amendment, the Child was conceived here, not born.

Second, and this one is critical to our debate on combating illegals -- the 14th Amendment applies, by its own title, "Citizenship Rights" to U.S. Citizens. Simply put, the offspring of valid U.S. Citizens are the only people for whom U.S. Citizenship is an automatic right.

Lest one thing I am playing a too technical game, let's consider the common law and how laws across this country are applied. In civil law, a contract to perform an illegal act is void. In criminal law, if one breaks the law or violates the Constitutional rights of a criminal, evidence procured in that matter is not permitted to be used. Simply put, the common law and public policy have never rewarded illegal conduct with new rights. It is absurd, on its face, that one could illegally enter this Country, and that his or her offspring, a product of the crime of illegal entry, would be rewarded with automatic citizenship.

This is an issue that must be addressed.
32 posted on 07/27/2004 4:20:55 PM PDT by Iron Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InsensitiveConservative
The ridiculous demands of illegal aliens in this country gets more clownish every day.

I wonder in which country is the private insurance plan that she pays her health insurance premiums to --- I bet she has no intention of paying for her own hospitalization or any health care her baby will ever receive.

33 posted on 07/27/2004 4:23:23 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
a temporary humanitarian visa to return to the United States because of complications in her pregnancy

Complications? She and that baby could be very expensive --- Mexico has a Socialized system of medicine --- it sounds unlikely she's paying for insurance so she can have the baby in a Mexican hospital meant for their indigent patients --- it won't cost her too much there --- health care if much more affordable in Mexico.

34 posted on 07/27/2004 4:26:08 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

I say let the captured SOB claim his citizenship, then try him for treason and have him executed.


35 posted on 07/27/2004 4:29:53 PM PDT by DaiHuy (MUST HAVE JUST BEEN BORN THAT WAY...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
health care if much more affordable in Mexico

So are funerals.

36 posted on 07/27/2004 4:34:01 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ('Carter is now their most respectable speaker tells you where the Dems are today.'- A. Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
This is an interesting argument. If life begins at concetpion, then the argument could be made to end abortion.
37 posted on 07/27/2004 4:40:49 PM PDT by TMSuchman (If we don't get out to vote, the anti-Americans will win, and we will loose everything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chode

actually... it does work that way. while a fetus is a living human, it has not passed the "birth" stage of life.

keeping this in mind, the law states that one can be a "natural born" citizen, not "natural-conceived citizen"

saying otherwise would open up a debate along the lines of "well, I visited the USA once, arent I a citizen too?"


38 posted on 07/27/2004 4:42:52 PM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Pregnant woman wants re-entry to U.S., lawyers say fetus is citizen

Conceived In Liberty?

39 posted on 07/27/2004 4:47:08 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer

no.

if that were true, i wouldnt have had the need for my mother to get back to the US base to have me in Frankfurt Germany, 1984.


40 posted on 07/27/2004 4:47:43 PM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson