Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OSHKOSH POLICE CONDUCT DOOR TO DOOR GUN CONFISCATIONS
Wisconsin Gun Owners Inc. ^ | 7-17-04

Posted on 07/27/2004 9:46:21 AM PDT by JOAT

TYRANNY ALERT!

OSHKOSH POLICE CONDUCT DOOR TO DOOR GUN CONFISCATIONS

Shooting of Oshkosh police officer results in knee jerk neighborhood gun grab

Oshkosh, Wis. -- Following the shooting of an Oshkosh police officer Saturday night, area residents were forced from their homes, their lawful firearms being confiscated by police.

The Oshkosh Police Department's Special Weapons and Tactics Unit responded to the area, with a K-9 police dog in pursuit of the perpetrator who was reported to have fled on foot.

Citizens' guns were seized through searches of area homes. The police promised to return the firearms after forensic tests proved they were not involved in the crime. The injured officer's name was withheld, but media reports indicate his condition is not life-threatening.

"The message is: Hand over your guns, now!" said Corey Graff, executive director of Wisconsin Gun Owners Inc. "This is a blatant case of guilty-until-proven-innocent and an abuse of police power."

Still, residents in the area are furious about the home invasions by police and what they see as theft of their property. Although early reports are unclear, they indicate a search warrant was issued for two homes, yet additional home owners also had firearms confiscated.

"We want the perpetrator of this crime caught and brought to justice just like everyone else," said Graff. "But that doesn't mean the police should trample citizens' 4th amendment protections, steal lawful private property and enter the home without reasonable suspicion or warrant."

One homeowner in the area said his guns were taken by police, guns that hadn't left his gun safe since last hunting season. Another victim of the police searches -- an elderly women -- reported waking up to officers' searching her home in the early morning hours.

The Oshkosh Northwestern reported, "Residents were not being allowed to return to their homes by press time."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; oshkosh; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-265 next last
To: Eaker
Outrage ping.

Buy
Lots
Of
Ammo
Today

61 posted on 07/27/2004 10:38:56 AM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

As usual, it looks like a lot of people on this board seem to think the Constitution and Bill of Rights actually are still in play. Shake it off. We haven't lived by the Rule of Law in this land in a long, long time. Deal with it. Buy guns. Teach your kids. Pray. Prepare for the purge. It's coming.


62 posted on 07/27/2004 10:39:50 AM PDT by FreeRadical (Buy Guns & Books & Guns & Books & More Guns & Books ... For Your Kids!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
"OMG. Is it time yet?"

Depends, are you on local time?

63 posted on 07/27/2004 10:43:41 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
You have implied that anyone who opposes this egregious action by the Oshkosh police, in violation of the letter and spirit of the U.S. and Wisconsin constitutions, as well as the principles of limited government and individual liberty upon which this nation was founded, is a murderer and a criminal. This is a tactic worthy of the average denizen of DU, albeit with better HTML skills.

You have chosen a very poor name for your FR handle. "Vulture Licensed by the Powers that Be" would be more fitting.

64 posted on 07/27/2004 10:44:08 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: spunkets

I'm not sure I'm even logged in.


65 posted on 07/27/2004 10:44:21 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: basil
without probable cause

A cop was shot and in the area, it certainly sounds like probable cause to me. Although it is unusal to evacuate everyone from their homes for six blocks, it wasn't excessive or in violation of anyone's rights. I am highly skeptical of the woman who claimed to wake up to police searching through her house (most likely, the press release failed to point out that someone ELSE in the home allowed them in).

66 posted on 07/27/2004 10:47:04 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (John F-ing Kerry??? NO... F-ING... WAY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Yeah but then you get hammered by the "well, if you don't have anything to hide" crowd. Then you will become a 'person of interest'.

I'll just have to be one. People who don't insist on their constitutional rights lose them, and deservedly so.

67 posted on 07/27/2004 10:52:19 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All

and the ones that they DO get back won't be scratched and scraped and dinged from the careful way the cops throw them into the trunk of their cars and on tables for inspection either... right???
68 posted on 07/27/2004 10:53:06 AM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Don W
The chief should be dismissed and charged with violating the constitution ... yada yada

Perhaps you should stop and take 10 slow breaths before believing the original article, which appears to be a hysterical and propaganda-laden screed written by whackjobs. Despite the heavy hints dropped by the news release, the cops didn't charge through the neighborhood demanding guns.

Instead, based on the news article (posted above), it appears that the police entered one (1) house, after having obtained a warrant to do so. If the article is accurate, it appears that the cops found what appears to be the weapon used in the shooting.

The real story is probably far closer to that in the news article than in the original shriek-piece.

The authors of the original piece would be well advised to STFU.

69 posted on 07/27/2004 10:55:55 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JOAT

BTTT


70 posted on 07/27/2004 10:56:12 AM PDT by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

You are right. Thanks for posting the real reports. It was only the pot grower's house that contained the brass in the back yard that was searched, and that was done with a warrant.

No one elses guns were taken and no one elses houses were searched. This is the second time this WI Gun Owner's assn has shown itself to me to be a clown outfit, unworthy of support.


71 posted on 07/27/2004 10:57:25 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
... it wasn't excessive or in violation of anyone's rights.

Bravo Sierra. Unless you see the perp run into my yard/house, then you better have a Godd*mn search warrent. Period.

At least we aren't using you for a "reasonable man" standard.

72 posted on 07/27/2004 10:57:44 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
It amazes me sometimes what is posted as "news" in this forum. This is a hyped up press release, bordering on yellow journalism

"Bordering?" This crap is straight out of the Josef Goebbels Correspondence Course.

73 posted on 07/27/2004 10:57:45 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

I have read the proffered articles, and the facts get even cloudier...

The police went on a door to door search armed with 'a' search warrant? No judge in his/her right mind would sign a warrant that had a whole nieghborhood as the location. It wouldn't stand up in court.

Further, the police admit that without the bullet, they have no case against the suspect from whom they seized three rifles. What was their reasoning for suspecting him? Because he had rifles? Did someone see him shoot at the officer? (No, the officer wasn't sure where the shot came from. So where did someone get the bright idea to execute a search of his house?)

This whole case stinks from top to bottom. Something funky going on in Oshkosh.


74 posted on 07/27/2004 11:00:27 AM PDT by ex 98C MI Dude (Proud Member of the Reagan Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
then you better have a Godd*mn search warrent

They had a "Godd*mn search warrant."

75 posted on 07/27/2004 11:01:21 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA

I don't care what silly uniform they have on. If they illegally break into my home, they will deal with the consequences.


76 posted on 07/27/2004 11:01:36 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

Thanks for those links. I read them all. None of them mentioned door to door gun confiscations. Hyped press release? Sounds like it.


77 posted on 07/27/2004 11:02:50 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nobdysfool
I hope the citizens have enough guts to press this all the way, and get some remuneration for the clear violation of constitutional rights these jack-booted thugs perpetrated. That Police Department sounds like it needs a thorough clean-out, from top to bottom.

It would be nice to think that they would press it all the way, but the reality is, they probably won't. Too many people these days accept and do whatever they are told...they fall into this "well, it's an inconvenience, and it's wrong, but as long as they catch the guy, they are making me safer" trap..

78 posted on 07/27/2004 11:05:56 AM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
I must confess, though, to being confused. Police evacuated a six-block area, went door to door and executed a search warrant, police said. A K-9 police dog also was seen sniffing near homes.

Did the search warrant authorize searching all of the homes in the area? Were they searching for weapons, perpetrators, or both? Is there such a thing as a blanket search warrant that allows police to search all the homes in a 6-block area? That seems awfully broad. How could there be probable cause to search individual homes in this manner?

79 posted on 07/27/2004 11:07:06 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: JOAT
man of interest and his wife

Outside of all the illegal activity by the police in this story, I'm sick of these stupid politically correct euphemisms. What ever happened to "suspect"?

80 posted on 07/27/2004 11:07:27 AM PDT by badbass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson