A "reverend" in a lesbian union? What kind of a chuch has that?
How can this be, I have it on good authority, from almost every Senate Democrat, that this wasn't even close to happening.
Will Massachusettes be forced to recognize CCW laws from all other states?
I would like all of these people to
shut up
sit down and
leave us alone.
We do not want to know.
We don't care.
We will not respect them more, and with the grief they subject us to, we will respect them less.
We do not want to modify our laws, our school books or our legal system just so they can play "getting married".
The only usefullness homosexual couples present to us right now is the corner they put JF'nK in, on the issues.
President Bush is rather clear on where he stands...JF'nK is not.
I think the interesting problem is that the political process is not moving quickly enough to get a Constitutional Amendment in place in time to stop a likely Ct. of Appeals decision followed by a S.C.O.T.U.S. affirmation.
So we may have a period when Federal right to marry may apply, followed by the implementation of a Constitutional Amendment which prohibits gay marriage. With a prohibition on bills of attainder and ex post facto laws – presumably we would be faced with a large number of gay marriages that would be “grandfathered”. Clearly the gay and lesbian legal organizations (which are very talented and very aggressive) are speeding along this path in an effort to be able to make the argument against a proposed Constitutional Amendment that “x00,000 marriages can’t be wrong”.
Republicans and conservative Democrats need to grow some balls on this issue and get an Amendment out of the Senate.
Bunch of dang freaks.....doom on em all.
Stay safe Ambrose !
Bring it on, fags.
Well this pretty well removes this issue from the old " let the states decide" arguement...So now where do people stand? That ought to be asked over and over and over again until all the dodgers are shown for the cowards they are.
Let's change this statement a little and wonder how the court would deal with it:
"I hope that the court recognizes that and says it isn't equality if two people can marry but three people cannot."
They are residents of Florida, not Massachusetts.
CERTAIN MARRIAGES PROHIBITED
Chapter 207: Section 11 Non-residents; marriages contrary to laws of domiciled state
Section 11. No marriage shall be contracted in this commonwealth by a party residing and intending to continue to reside in another jurisdiction if such marriage would be void if contracted in such other jurisdiction, and every marriage contracted in this commonwealth in violation hereof shall be null and void.
They're judge shopping - looking for a liberal judge who will agree with them.
"No one has anything to be afraid of by recognizing our marriage," Wilson said outside the courthouse Tuesday. "
Who says anyone is afraid of it. We are downright sick of these people flaunting their unethical and sinful behaviour in our faces. These people won't be happy until their lifestyle is rated one step higher than heterosexual marriage.
NOW .. DOES EVERYBODY SEE WHY WE MUST HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT!!
This scum will not stop until they destroy America.
Can we sue to force all states to recognize "concealed carry" laws?
The House is voting on a bill to stop this kind of thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1175499/posts?page=4