Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lesbians sue to have all states recognize Massachusetts marriage
AP ^ | 7.20.04

Posted on 07/20/2004 10:14:57 PM PDT by ambrose

Posted on Tue, Jul. 20, 2004

Lesbians sue to have all states recognize Massachusetts marriage

MITCH STACY

Associated Press

TAMPA, Fla. - A lesbian couple from Bradenton who were married in Massachusetts sued the federal government Tuesday to have their union legally recognized in the rest of the country.

The suit was filed against U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft in federal court in Tampa.

The couple's attorney, Ellis Rubin, has filed five previous suits in state and federal courts challenging the ban, but Tuesday's was believed to be the first to attempt to compel the federal government and other states to recognize a union that occurred in a state where same-sex unions are legal.

The suit was filed on behalf of the Rev. Nancy Wilson, a Metropolitan Community Church minister, and Paula Schoenwether, a family marriage counselor. The two have been together for 27 years and were married July 2 in Massachusetts, the only state where same-sex marriages are recognized.

"No one has anything to be afraid of by recognizing our marriage," Wilson said outside the courthouse Tuesday. "We consider ourselves to have been married for 27 years, but we know this is a moment in history, this is a time in which gay and lesbian people are not going to accept second-class citizenship in our country."

Rubin's suit claims that the ban on gay marriage is a constitutional issue, which is why Ashcroft is named as a defendant. Hillsborough County Clerk Richard L. Ake is also named because he had declined to issue the couple a Florida marriage license.

The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act and a 1997 Florida statute that defines marriage as the union between a man and woman violate the equal-protection rights of his clients, Rubin said.

"The Florida law and federal law separates and makes second-class citizens out of gays and lesbians because of their gender and sexual orientation," Rubin said. "I hope that the court recognizes that and says it isn't equality if opposite sex couples can marry but same-sex couples cannot."

Ashcroft spokesman Charles Miller said Tuesday that no one in his office had seen the suit, and he would not comment.

Ake said he was following Florida law when he denied the couple a marriage license.

The U.S. Senate last week handed a defeat to President Bush when it scuttled a proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americaatwar; anarchy; attackingthefamily; civilization; culturalmarxism; cultureofself; culturewar; doma; hedonism; homosexualagenda; homosexualbehavior; lawsuit; marriage; marxism; mockingmarriage; prisoners; protectchildren; protectfamily; protectmarriage; rebellion; romans1; secularhumanism; spiritualbattle; wagesofsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: ambrose

The House is voting on a bill to stop this kind of thing.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1175499/posts?page=4


41 posted on 07/21/2004 6:49:14 AM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
That's good news. Hopefully, it will reach the Supreme Court. If they support the plaintiffs, a Constitutional amendment will follow.
42 posted on 07/21/2004 6:52:47 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnmorris886
Their pretend "marriage" is null and void according to the statute that I posted.

The Sunday New York Times has had 4 or 5 announcements of Massachusetts non-resident gay marriages. I called Governor Romney's office about it - since he has been trying to uphold the residency law. The young man I spoke with (probably a student intern, probably gay) did NOT want to hear about it.

43 posted on 07/21/2004 7:02:09 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: EdReform

Yaaayyy! EdReform's back!! Heeeyahh!

If anyone thinks that radical homosexuals (and remind me again, please, of how most homosexuals are just peaceful, monogamous, conservative, beige-wearing, buttoned down, uncle and auntie type, Republican voting, "gay" agenda loathers?) do NOT want to destroy the moral foundation of human society, please raise your hands!

(If any hands are raised, I'll bring out the "In their own words" quoting noted homosexual spokespersons' own viewpoint on "gay" marriage.)


44 posted on 07/21/2004 7:30:07 AM PDT by little jeremiah ("You're possibly the most ignorant, belligerent, and loathesome poster on FR currently." - tdadams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: goldstategop

You said it brilliantly....too bad the cowards in congress decided to duck and run


46 posted on 07/21/2004 11:20:10 AM PDT by jnarcus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson