Skip to comments.
THIS IS THE RELEVANT STATUTE, 18 U.S.C. 793 (f), governing Berger's behavior:
Instapundit ^
| 7/20/04
Posted on 07/20/2004 7:46:40 PM PDT by Brian Mosely
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: hole_n_one; gogipper
Good points, both of you.
21
posted on
07/20/2004 8:22:48 PM PDT
by
Bahbah
To: Brian Mosely
The bigger question is why did he do it? Why would he risk ten years in prison? To whitewash the clintoon legacy? Not likely unless Hitlery had his among the 900 FBI files. Was there something in there that would damage the 'Rat party or some highly placed person int he DNC so badly that 10 years in prison was an acceptable price? Did he provide the documents to Kerry and other Kerry haters?
WHAT DID KERRY KNOW AND WHEN DID HE KNOW IT?
22
posted on
07/20/2004 8:23:21 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: ez
He "'inadvertently' stuck it in his pants?????" The man's a liar and deserves to be in jail, BIG TIME. I'm glad he resigned from Kerry's campaign, too. I hope there is a HUGE uproar over this.
23
posted on
07/20/2004 8:24:31 PM PDT
by
bboop
To: Brian Mosely
Glad I saw this thread.
Good post.
To: Brian Mosely
Exactly, this is the very bad for the Rats.
I jus thad a revelation. Is this Hitlery sabotaging Kerry for her 2008 run?
25
posted on
07/20/2004 8:26:26 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: bboop
Is this how Hitlery is sabotaging Kerry's campaign so that she can run in 2008?
26
posted on
07/20/2004 8:27:29 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn't be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Brian Mosely
This is a joke, right? Tell me he wasn't stuffing national security documents in his socks.
27
posted on
07/20/2004 8:37:42 PM PDT
by
Tennessean4Bush
(An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds, a pessimist fears this is true.)
To: Brian Mosely
28
posted on
07/20/2004 8:45:24 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: lacylu; MamaDearest; Domestic Church; Honestly; Calpernia; DAVEY CROCKETT
This is an interesting opinion/thought on this clinton creep.
29
posted on
07/20/2004 8:55:37 PM PDT
by
nw_arizona_granny
(You could do a general Google search for: jihad internet today)
To: holdonnow
Why didn't Hannity take your call today?
To: Dog; Peach; Miss Marple; Rivendell; Iowa Granny; Utah Girl; Common Tator; ...
31
posted on
07/20/2004 9:04:18 PM PDT
by
kayak
(Help stamp out FReepathons. Become a monthly donor.)
To: bboop
He "'inadvertently' stuck it in his pants?????" The man's a liar and deserves to be in jail..There are (at least) two crimes here..
1 the original theft
2 Lying to federal investigators
Hmmm, didn't someone just get jail time this week for lying to Federal investigators?
32
posted on
07/20/2004 9:28:03 PM PDT
by
Wil H
To: goldstategop
This is a not a good place for Kerry to be...
The majority of the public will tend to put lotsa Ketchup on a fried Berger!
To: Wil H
Yes. And speaking of "national secrets", what the heck is going on at Los Alamos?!
34
posted on
07/20/2004 10:14:39 PM PDT
by
88keys
To: Tennessean4Bush; Freee-dame
This is a joke, right? Tell me he wasn't stuffing national security documents in his socks.
%%%%%
Questions are raging about why Berger did this; what exactly was taken; who did he risk prison for...
I haven't yet read or heard this comment about the Clinton crowd. They all had COMPLETE disdain for National Security during their entire 8 years in office. Berger's wilful 'pilfering' (to use Dennis Hastert's word) was just normal practice in handling classified material for that gang.
The "sloppiness" that Berger references was in forgetting that Clintonistas were no longer in charge. Actual rules were actually being followed during the Bush Administration.
Very sloppy mistake, Sandy.
35
posted on
07/21/2004 6:50:52 AM PDT
by
maica
(Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
To: hole_n_one
"(2)
having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer -"
Wonder why bjclinton is laughing, since he sent Sandy the Burglar over to check out the documents?????
To: Just mythoughts
Wonder why bjclinton is laughing, since he sent Sandy the Burglar over to check out the documents?????
Bill Clinton is laughing because it is his only defense. This is serious and he doesn't want it to grow into turning on a real 9-11 commission because it will expose one of his biggest lies.
Some of the headlines are trying to pass this off as insignificant. They may get away with it, but this is a small roadsign that points to a much bigger fish.
The fish is Clinton. The smug #$#@@ thinks he's got away with it but the heat might be turned back up.
Let's try and add some more wood to the fire.
37
posted on
07/21/2004 7:14:34 AM PDT
by
BILL_C
To: BILL_C
"Bill Clinton is laughing because it is his only defense. This is serious and he doesn't want it to grow into turning on a real 9-11 commission because it will expose one of his biggest lies.
Some of the headlines are trying to pass this off as insignificant. They may get away with it, but this is a small roadsign that points to a much bigger fish.
The fish is Clinton. The smug #$#@@ thinks he's got away with it but the heat might be turned back up.
Let's try and add some more wood to the fire."
bjclinton making this a joking matter over a sloppy man is the same as taunting the DOJ to nail his sorry behind.
This man is one perverted revolting human, and I totally reject anything attempt by this low life bunch to downplay stuffing classified documents on one's person as innocent.
Seems the statute is very clear that any person with knowledge of stolen documents is culpable.
To: goldstategop
bet your wrong... that is 10 years per offense. He will get hard time.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson