Posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by BILL_C
The Democrats are setting themselves up to fall hard, with no help from the Republicans. The missing pieces of the puzzle are starting to form an ugly picture of treachery, lies, and coverups.
I hope so. I was pretty surprised that Rush had him on a couple of weeks ago. He just called in, and Rush didn't challenge him on his dirtbag tendencies. But I suppose you can't just ambush a US Senator on national radio.
You should do it on pay per view.
bookmark
Even if we accept that Sandy Burglar didn’t shove any documents down his socks, he did admit shoving them in his pants and jacket pockets. He claims he was “sloppy.”
Think about it: in order to fit those documents in his pockets, he would need to fold them once, probably twice. I’ve never worked for the government, much less handled classified files, but I would imagine that folding them is a no-no. Berger would have known this.
The only way he could have placed those documents on his person without folding them is to push them down behind his waistband or inside his shirt. Are we to believe that he forgot about them, didn’t feel any discomfort, left that room, exited the building and went home? Did he notice them when he undressed for bed that night? He must have; he admitted “inadvertently discarding” some of the files. Apparently, he didn’t realize these files belonged to the National Archive. He didn’t notice “CLASSIFIED” stamped on them, presumably in bright red ink. He only realized, he tells us, what he’d done the next day when the National Archive contacted him. Too late. He had already “discarded” some of the papers. By an amazing coincidence, these missing files just happened to be some of the most critical documents, relating to the Millennium plot.
The liberal media will quietly drop this story when the Democrat convention begins. After that, they’ll return to their favorite topics: Abu Ghraib and Bush’s National Guard service. They’ll also make every effort to avoid mentioning one Joseph C. Wilson IV.
GWB is trying to protect the PRESIDENCY - not Bill Clinton - but the office of President of the United States. I understand, as I think it would be devastaing for the country, as well as world stability, to think that a president of the United States would cover up something of this magnitude
Yeah, when Vince Foster disappeared from the White House and wound up in Ft. Marcy Park that July day in '93, that was the only day in the eight years of the Clinton Administration that ALL of the security cameras at the White House INADVERTENTLY went on the blink.
And they all said it with a straight face.
What I have been missing in these theories is why foreign terrorists would participate in the OKC and TWA800 attacks but then fail to claim credit and threaten more of the same or worse. I haven't been following the discussions on these theories in any detail, so I may have missed the explanation. Can you fill me in on the thinking on that question?
Why not? Their deflection strategy, along with a complicit media and corrupt DOJ/CIA/FBI types has always worked before.
This time, we can't let the story die. Berger has to go to jail--no excuses.
I hope I live long enough to see the Sink Emperor and Shrillary in orange jumpsuits marked "Ft. Leavenworth" on the back.
Hey, these things happen ...
It would seem that inside his shirt would be a bit risky --- they could be visible, inside his waistband would not prevent them from slipping or being wrinkled --- to me the most logical place you'd put documents you were removing and couldn't be caught removing would be in your underwear which would help hold them in place.
FOR ALL FREEPERS, I HAVE 2 questions:
1) On what date was the first WTC bombing ?
2) On what date did Clinton roll tanks in WACO, TX ?
What I have been missing in these theories is why foreign terrorists would participate in the OKC and TWA800 attacks but then fail to claim credit and threaten more of the same or worse.
Someone want to explain to clinton that telling wes clark to point our tank at our own people didn't work ?
Exactly... and yet Burglar claims not to have noticed. Presumably he drove or was driven home, but wasn't the least bit uncomfortable while sitting. And this clown was National Security Advisor? God help us!
This story won't go away or die on its own, no matter how hard the Democrats and the mainstream media try to bury it or shade it from view.
No you don't
When a criminal operative for the Dems gets caught red handed as Berger was it is open season to conjecture anything you like until they explain themselves or disprove your claims.
The Republicans need to repeatedly put about some really nasty rumor or innuendo, through plausibly deniable but accredited sources (just as the Dems would use the NYT), about Kerry and clinton until it is either accepted as fact or the Dems tell the truth about what Berger was up to.
My guess is that they can't do the latter and survive politically, so it is open season on clinton and Kerry.
Hey snake, what was your role in all of this?
.
I agree. The media are trying to shift the focus onto the timing of the leak. That makes no sense. This is by no means the optimum time to leak this bombshell. The Dems would do it four or five days before the election (Ask Bush and (R)nold). Maybe it WAS a Republican who leaked it; if so... great! It's about time our side started playing hardball with these people. Kerrey, ben Veniste and Gorelick etc. have been leaking like crazy all year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.