Posted on 07/20/2004 7:44:02 PM PDT by BILL_C
What do some of the craziest events in recent American History all have in common? No, this is not another Blue Dress story, but it is about the biggest crime Bill Clinton committed as president. It was such a small political lie for him but it turned out to have incredible ramifications to our country. Slick Willy may be headed for the title of worst president in United States history, in fact, he might even qualify for the biggest traitor label.
And further more, you don’t even suspect it happened.
Just what was Sandy Berger doing stuffing documents into his clothes while preparing for the 9-11 hearings? Lanny Davis was on natioal news earlier today saying that the leak right before the Democratic Convention just had to be politically motivated.
Did you ever wonder how literally hundreds of witnesses could see a mass murder but the official report not only ignores these citizens but offers solutions that are physically impossible? Conclusions such as this are possible whenever the conspiracy label is attached. And what was all the fuss about Jamie Gorelick being on the 9-11commission? Why did we get bored seeing Richard Clark attacking President Bush in the 9-11 hearings? If you’re one of Bill Clinton’s boys or girls that was in his inner circle, the noose is tightening.
They know what happened but you don’t know, not yet.
In 1994, Bill Clinton was shocked at the Republican massacre in the congressional election. His chances of reelection seemed dim. Drastic action was called for if he was going to see a second term.
The first challenge to Bill Clinton was the Federal Building bombing at Oklahoma City in 1995. As documented in Jayana Davis’ book “The Third Terrorist”, McVeigh and Nichol’s were not the only ones involved in the bombing. It seems that there were Iraqi defectors from Gulf War 1 in OKC. One of the Iraqi soldiers got out of the truck with McVeigh a few minutes before the truck bomb exploded. You may recall the story during the Nichols trial in OKC earlier this spring concerning the surveillance tape that agreed with witnesses showing two men getting out of the truck. Later, the FBI said there was no surveillance tape. This same Iraqi later moved to Boston and was working at Boston Logan Int’l airport the morning of 9-11-01. Is it a small world or was something going on here? The FBI has never investigated.
In Jayna’s book, she ties the Iraqis together with McVeigh and Nichols. Read the book and listen to her interview with Jim Quinn from Pittsburgh in the WARROOM which was aired April 20, 2004. It is in the archives. It will open your eyes.
Why did the investigation focus on two Americans when numerous witnesses testified that others were involved? And of course the initial reports detailed that two middle Eastern men were wanted? What happened?
Bill Clinton knew that if it was shown that foreign terrorists were killing Americans in Oklahoma City his chance of being reelected would vanish. Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing middle eastern terrorists from the equation and concluding that two right wing extremists motivated by Waco were the cause, the only cause. There was no Middle Eastern conspiracy by presidential order.
Flash ahead to July, 1996 and an airplane leaving from JFK in New York City crashes off Long Island. Hundreds of witnesses see a missile shoot the plane from the sky but the investigation concludes that it was a center fuel tank explosion. Jack Cashill in his book on flight TWA 800 faces the same problem that Jayna Davis did with the Oklahoma City bombing a year earlier. WHY? Witnesses saw one thing but the investigation reported something else.
The crash of TWA 800 occurred before the Democratic convention. As in Oklahoma City, Jamie Gorelick was tasked with removing terrorism from the equation. Richard Clark supplied the center fuel tank scenario, the CIA supplied the computer simulation and Bill Clinton was home free.
Flash ahead to 9-11-01: Bill Clinton has said several times that he first thought of Bin Laden when he heard about the WTC attacks. Actually it had to be Al Qaeda, not Iraq, or his “brilliant” plan might be discovered. But Clinton was not out of the woods yet.
The 9-11 commission is tasked with finding the truth. Jamie Gorelick is on the commission to ensure they don’t. Sandy Berger while preparing to testify is caught removing classified documents by hiding them under his clothes. Anyone who has ever held a TOP SECRET clearance can relate to the sinking feeling he must have in his stomach today as the news is released.
The lies that turned to conspiracy theories led to thousands dying in NYC and Washington, DC on 9-11. Instead of Bill Clinton taking care of business in Iraq in 1995 when Iraqi defectors were caught killing Americans he covered up their involvement to get reelected. His co-conspirators are still trying to cover up the biggest lie in American history.
One of the questions now facing Sandy Berger is will he get a deal? I’m sure he watches Law and Order occasionally so he’s probably familiar with the process. Sell out Bill Clinton and the democratic party and you may get out of jail one day. Otherwise, it just doesn’t look very good.
Bill Clinton, the noose is tightening around your neck. Your legacy is the least of your problems. Everyone understands you’re a natural born liar but most didn’t even suspect the havoc you caused with you lies in 1995.
Now everyone will know it wasn’t an intelligence failure. It was Slick Willy all along.
Sadam did not want his fingerprints of OKC for obvious reasons....
We keep losing secrets from Los Alamos... Two recent major incidents where disks were 'misplaced'.
How far does the rabbit hole go Alice?
peace....D
That administration sponsored Federal terrorism at the siege of the Dravidian complex so why would they be concerned about lying about this?
Thanks for the ping Happy. Here we are still learning things almost two years later.
bttt
bttt
Is Sandy Berger related to Warren E. Burger, former Chief Justice of the United States?
Ok, ok, ok ... but if it's true, wouldn't we have heard from some terrorist group (on Al-jazeeera) claiming responsibility for the OKC bombing?
Good story, but it doesn't fit into reality.
No offense maam...but you need to wake up and smell the coffee. 1) the government lies all the time and 2) it hasn't been "yours" or "my" government for some time now.
"They must have had some reason to believe that the investigation would be quashed -- or Kerry would have dumped Berger long ago."
Not necessarily. This gang has gotten away with "murder" for so long that they still don't believe that s**t stinks.
Thanks. Criminals are anti-freedom, anti-life. Most never stop until they are incarcerated or killed.
Another response to the same question from a thread several years ago....
In short, the two people with the most to gain by having a foreign involvement, and the two with the most to lose by being the sole culprits, have both rejected the notion that anyone else was involved.
And yet one of those two people, portrayed by the government as a right wing, white supremecist, militia-type, penned an eloquent defense of Iraq as his swan song.
Consider then that he may have been protecting "others unkown" rather than being a rat because he truly sypathized with the Iraqi cause, as his own words would indicate. "Lily White" may have also been protecting his sister from suffering retribution, should he have outed the identies of his handlers.
29 posted on 09/05/2002 5:49:23 AM PDT by Wm Bach
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/744920/posts
Ping
Thanks for your help!
Bill
Well thought out reply. Thank you.
I remain unconvinced....but willing to consider any new or underreported aspects of this.
Sorry, I don't view this POS as a "freedom fighter".
He was a animal that butchered men, women and children.
I think you're on to something here, i.e., Islamic Terrorists will search out fellow travelers that they can use for cover and for friendly assistance.
That may explain why Nick Berg's e-mail was used by Moussarri. Berg was being probed as a possible "friendly" as he was open and interested in Islam. I think it turned out to be a misperception by Moussarri (that Berg was someone who could be used).
Whether any of this played any role in Berg's subsequent abduction and slaughter in Iraq would be speculative. It may have been mere coincidence or maybe not.
But I think that Islamic terrorists in this country are looking to use "friendlies" just as your post indicates that they did in Spain.
That's why the Leftists in this country are so dangerous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.