Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutors: No Dice on Berger Deal
News Max ^ | 7-20-04

Posted on 07/20/2004 6:35:36 PM PDT by hope

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-212 next last
To: hope

Just the first of the Clinton admin bigwigs to get their comeuppance. Can't wait for the rest.


61 posted on 07/20/2004 7:03:37 PM PDT by thoughtomator (End the imperialist moo slime colonization of the West!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard

LOL! ...we better seek protection for that endangered species!


62 posted on 07/20/2004 7:03:50 PM PDT by hope ( Let no man deceive you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: hope

Does anyone else see Arkancide in SB's future?


63 posted on 07/20/2004 7:04:10 PM PDT by lewislynn (Why do the same people who think "free trade" is the answer also want less foreign oil dependence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope

HELL YEAH!


64 posted on 07/20/2004 7:04:32 PM PDT by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I got to believe Kerry didn't know because whatever else I think of him I can't believe he'd let a guy facing this remain his advisor.

Clinton's interview with the 9/11 Commission was the raison d'etre for Berger's research in the National Archives. Along with Bruce Lindsey, Berger attended the session as Clinton's advisor.

It doesn't seem likely that, in this role, Berger would've been filching documents for Kerry's campaign -- which, at the time (October, '03), was damn near under water.

So, here are a couple of questions:

1. Was Berger acting at Clinton's urging when he filled his jacket, pants and socks with Top Secret paper?

2. Did Clinton broker Berger's services to the Kerry campaign?

If the answer to the latter question is "Yes", then Kerry knows he's been had. And that his campaign is well and truly sabotaged -- and he'll be fighting a two-front war until November.

65 posted on 07/20/2004 7:04:50 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hope

I think he'll have an accident before he can open his mouth in a courtroom. This isn't going to fly. Hillary won't let it.


66 posted on 07/20/2004 7:06:18 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl ("In the Kingdom of the Deluded, the Most Outrageous Liar is King".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer

I thought I wanted to be president but I've changed my mind and just want to live quietly off my wife's money. It's for the children!!


67 posted on 07/20/2004 7:06:21 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
My advice to Berger: "Just don't go anywhere near Fort Marcy Park".
68 posted on 07/20/2004 7:07:06 PM PDT by auzerais (C*ANSWER: a fatally wasting brain disease afflicting the pro-jihadist Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Come on, everyone realizes politics are more important than national security. Berger did it for the Clinton Administration, the most ethical ever by self-acclamation, so it couldn't possibly have have posed any threat to the country or its interests. It's not like he conspired with anyone to remove the documents, or that he did so for financial gain (at least I don't think the prosecutors cam prove it) so what's the harm?

Seriously, what could possibly justify his actions? His reputation, as well as other Clinton Administration officials' reputations, might be tarnished if the material was made public. It was highly classified. If the Democrats hadn't pressed for the 9/11 Commission hearings in an attempt to embarrass the Bush Administration the contents of the documents would have been forgotten for as long as they remained classified. Putting political interests ahead of national interests in time of war is no laughing matter. Hopefully, the Justice Department will pursue the matter with all the vigor available.


69 posted on 07/20/2004 7:08:26 PM PDT by Poodlebrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

I wonder how soon Henry Waxman will demand an investigation into this? (sarcasm off)


70 posted on 07/20/2004 7:08:50 PM PDT by steve7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog
They suspect he gave it to someone else. Can we say HUNTING BIG GAME.

Kerry? Might it all be a setup by the Toon to force Kerry out, who will be replaced by Shillery at the last second?

71 posted on 07/20/2004 7:09:50 PM PDT by ambrose (Kerry is endorsed by the Communist Party USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: hope
I hope they're series, but I'm pessimistic - the urge to deal and plea bargain is just too strong. Typically, the press talks about 10 to 20 years, to satisfy the mob's (i.e. our) initial thirst for blood when the news is hot, but when it comes to sentencing those fantasy Lotto numbers will be long forgotten. And later on? Well, in other news today, typically buried on page 13, Soliah, the SLA pig turned soccer mom baking cookies for the homeless, is appealing her "harsh" sentence, which itself was a result of a "deal". Oh, and she's serving a couple of sentences simultaneously, which is another mystery of the best justice system in the world. How the hell is that done? Does she forego sleep to have 8 hours a day counted toward the other sentence?

Finally, as we shall see demonstrated again, our public/political reality is defined by the media and no one else. Why is "Watergate" commonly considered the crime of the century, how has it become such a well understood term, while Travelgate and all the Krintong gates have faded into obscurity? We like to think we are the ones who are completely in charge of assigning proper values to such things. We like to think...

(And I'm not talking about our little corner of the world right here, I'm talking about out there.)

Sandy walks, the story will be buried and forgotten, while "Enron" enters the everyday vocabulary just like "Watergate" did.

72 posted on 07/20/2004 7:10:08 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01

Kerry knows about his own liberal record and he ignores that. I'm sure Kerry knew. He just didn't know that it would get farther than it has.


73 posted on 07/20/2004 7:10:10 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: randog
FREE BERGER!

Dood! I'm there!

74 posted on 07/20/2004 7:10:32 PM PDT by Libloather (The United States is, by far, the COOLEST country to live in - EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I got to believe Kerry didn't know because whatever else I think of him I can't believe he'd let a guy facing this remain his advisor.

It seems logical to conclude this but we are dealing with a man who took and destroyed classified documents, even as he knew he was being monitored. And aren't we also dealing with a man who required a warrant in order to search his office and home for the missing documents? Now his lawyer says he's willing to cooperate? Could it be Berger thought the story ended after the searches, I keep hearing that the FBI has not talked to him.

75 posted on 07/20/2004 7:10:54 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Kerry doesn't care. In any case he's short advisors with knowledge of anyplace other than North Vietnam.


76 posted on 07/20/2004 7:11:14 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hope

The ONLY trading cards Berger has to avoid jail time would be dirt on Hillary.


77 posted on 07/20/2004 7:11:23 PM PDT by taxcontrol (People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
CBS Chief White House Correspondent John Roberts reports Berger returned to the archives all but two of the documents - which he believes he accidentally threw away. An FBI search of his home in January turned up nothing. And late Tuesday, law enforcement sources say they don't expect charges to be filed.

I don't care if he returned ALL the documents! THE MAN COMMITTED A CRIME! I certainly hope Ashcroft doesn't deal on this one.

78 posted on 07/20/2004 7:12:06 PM PDT by teletech (Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hope

Wouldn't that be great?


79 posted on 07/20/2004 7:12:38 PM PDT by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

Good point.


80 posted on 07/20/2004 7:14:12 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 201-212 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson