Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

AP Photo/Lefteris Pitarakis

Palestinian soccer players practice near Israel's separation barrier in the West Bank town of Abu Dis on Tuesday.


1 posted on 07/20/2004 5:28:41 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NormsRevenge; dennisw; veronica; SJackson

I expect you've seen this bit of insanity, but just in case.


2 posted on 07/20/2004 5:32:00 PM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Unbelievable, freaking unbelievable to see a UN that will not even allow a country to protect itself with a fence much less military force.

What do they want them to do, kill themselves.

Idiot UN


3 posted on 07/20/2004 5:32:55 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
"The vote was 150 in favor, 6 opposed - including the United States - and 10 abstentions."

If the above statement isn't proof that the UN is anti-Israel/anti-America I don't know what is. Unf#ckingbelievable.
4 posted on 07/20/2004 5:36:52 PM PDT by we_will_prevail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Perhaps Israel can provide their masonry services along our southern border.

Come to think of it, our northern border could also use some help.


5 posted on 07/20/2004 5:37:10 PM PDT by Buck W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
The 191-member world body voted after lengthy negotiations between the Arab League and the European Union which resulted in a revised text that was accepted by both groups.

The Arabs wanted the text to authorize killing the Jews and taking their possessions.

The Europeans wanted the text to authorize taking the Jews' possessions first and killing them afterwards.

They compromised with text that authorizes either.

6 posted on 07/20/2004 5:37:52 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Palestinian U.N. observer Nasser al-Kidwa (R) looks up at the voting board at the United Nations (news - web sites) General assembly in New York on July 20, 2004. The U.N. General Assembly voted overwhelmingly to demand that Israel obey a World Court ruling and tear down its West Bank barrier. The vote in the 191-nation assembly was 150-6, with 10 abstentions. (Chip East/Reuters)


9 posted on 07/20/2004 5:48:13 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi Mac ... Godspeed x40 ... Support Our Troops!!! ......Become a FR Monthly Donor ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
The Palestinians say the current route of the wall amounts to a land grab, because parts of the barrier are being built on West Bank land that Israel conquered in the 1967 Middle East war.

What's funny - I actually find it funny, in a tragic way - is that this type of thing gets reported with a straight face.

Look, even if this passage is true, the "land grab" occurred back in 1967. Yes, Israel took that land. In a war. That kind of thing tends to happen in wars. (Which Israel didn't even start, in this case.) Now they are building a fence around that land, which they took (in a war - as happens in wars), to protect the people living in their country (which, yes, now includes that additional land, that they took (in a war (which tends to happen to the victor in a war))).

The Palestinian position is and has always been that they want that land "back". Well, fight a war and take it back you idiots. Otherwise SHUT THE HELL UP because I'm sick and tired of hearing about you.

But by calling Israel defending land it already took a "land grab", what the UN is effectively on the record here saying is that they are rooting for the Palestinians to finish and win the 1967 Israeli-Arab war. Whether or not they realize it.

And this resolution should be viewed accordingly.

10 posted on 07/20/2004 5:49:38 PM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The Palestinians say the current route of the wall amounts to a land grab, because parts of the barrier are being built on West Bank land that Israel conquered in the 1967 Middle East war. Israel says the fence is needed to keep out suicide bombers.


I say, move the wall out as far as the border with Egypt, Syria, Lebanon etc.
Now THAT would be an Israel! Oh yeah, capital Jeruselem!


12 posted on 07/20/2004 5:51:27 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The United States and Israel = 2

Who were the other 4?

BTW--proud of our (US) vote!


14 posted on 07/20/2004 5:52:12 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Good reason to leave it in place.

Actually, this is one of those problems that do not allow half-answers. To do too little is suicide.

Israel must choose a defensible border, and seal it. This is what they have done with the erection of the wall, and nothing short of this will work. It has the effect of freeing them from constant attacks that have killed so many.

It has the secondary effect of turning the arabs inward on themselves, and hurrying the collapse of the west bank experiment. An isolated, autonomous arab west bank cannot work, and can't be anything other than what it has been, a lawless enclave. An arab west bank cut off from Israeli jobs, Israeli markets, and without Israel as the focus of its rage is a west bank that must implode, and that is what we are seeing.

By definition, jewish palestine is Israel, and arab palestine is Jordan. That land that is not claimed and defended by Israel is Jordan. Cut off from Israel by their own actions, the west bank arabs have no future except to look toward Jordan. Jordan is their future. There will never be an independent West Bank.


15 posted on 07/20/2004 5:52:26 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

Build that wall!


16 posted on 07/20/2004 5:53:07 PM PDT by don-o (Stop Freeploading. Do the right thing and sign up for a monthly donation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

"U.N. resolution directs Israel to remove barrier"

Israel Knesset directs the 150 affirmative voting nations to pull out of New York and set up their anti-semetic $hit in some backwater country such as Swaziland...let the diplomats have fun buggying down the streets paved with manure instead of living high on the hog along the lights of Broadway.


17 posted on 07/20/2004 5:55:35 PM PDT by Napoleon Solo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
this is just unbelievable. I read about the International Court of Justice ruling the other day and wasn't terribly surprised. But 150 to 6, the UN must have soiled their pants when they saw the ICJ had beaten them to condemning the fence.

The lines are very clearly drawn around the world wrt this latest incarnation of evil which was defeated just 60 years ago. It's pretty much Israel and a good part of the English speaking world (with a few exceptions) against everybody else. The pressures will only continue to build.
18 posted on 07/20/2004 5:56:40 PM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The EU and the UN are traveling at warp speed into a galaxy called Irrelevance.


21 posted on 07/20/2004 6:01:02 PM PDT by quadrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

I hear the UN will soon be voting on a similar resolution pertaining to China's great wall. These people are so transparently anti-Israel, they make the aryan nation look moderate by comparison. Why doesn't the UN come right out and say that any measure Israel takes to defend itself and its citizens will be condemned? I hope Sharon and the Israelis stand firm and don't cave in to these jokers in the UN.


22 posted on 07/20/2004 6:01:30 PM PDT by American Infidel (It is far better to be feared than it is to be loved)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

The UN is not empowered to direct...traffic.


24 posted on 07/20/2004 6:03:17 PM PDT by kcar (www.TheUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge
In an equally relevant vote, the United Nations unanimously voted to ban all-chocolate sprinkles in favor of rainbow-multi-colored, multi-culturally friendly sprinkles as not to offend anyone eating ice cream on the premise.
25 posted on 07/20/2004 6:14:56 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge

is there any way to ship out the UN to Mexico where they wont be as much leeches/parasites on the US taxpayers?


33 posted on 07/20/2004 8:10:51 PM PDT by prophetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NormsRevenge; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; spectacularbid2003; Binyamin; ...
I know this is a loaded question but can there be anything else on G-d's green earth that would be a bigger pointless waste of time?





If you'd like to be on or off this
Christian Supporters of Israel ping list,
please FR mail me. ~
  -  -
MikeFromFR ~
There failed not ought of any good thing which the LORD had
spoken unto the house of Israel; all came to pass. (Joshua 21:45)

Letter To The President In Support Of Israel ~
'Final Solution,' Phase 2 ~
Warnings ~
45 posted on 07/21/2004 11:41:32 AM PDT by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson