Skip to comments.
Ginsberg: "Kerry Must Answer This ESSENTIAL Point Re: Sandy Berger"
My videotape of Fox Interview. ^
| 7-20-04
| Ben Ginsberg
Posted on 07/20/2004 9:06:44 AM PDT by Matchett-PI
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-208 next last
Don't allow the media to focus your attention on Clinton over this Sandy Berger criminal investigation. Ben Ginsberg points out the essential question --- and it has to do with the KERRY CAMPAIGN
To: Matchett-PI
Ah...Ben Ginsberg...my heart almost stopped for a minute when I thought it was Ruth Vader...
2
posted on
07/20/2004 9:08:57 AM PDT
by
Corin Stormhands
(I'm going on vacation in 10 days...)
To: oldglory; MinuteGal; Luke FReeman; gonzo; sheikdetailfeather; mcmuffin; Mustang; Bob Ireland; ...
3
posted on
07/20/2004 9:10:10 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
To: Matchett-PI
Berger Docugate ping
The New York Times: (212) 556-7652
The New York Post: (212) 930-8000
ABC: 212-456-7777
CBS: 212-975-4321
NBC: 212-664-4444
CNN: 404-237-0234
Fox:1-888-369-4762
NY York Daily News (212) 210-NEWS
4
posted on
07/20/2004 9:11:31 AM PDT
by
votelife
(Calling abortion a women's issue is like calling war a men's issue!)
To: Matchett-PI
Hope the story has legs ping!
5
posted on
07/20/2004 9:11:50 AM PDT
by
pushforbush
("How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries!" --Churchill)
To: Corin Stormhands
Ah...Ben Ginsberg...my heart almost stopped for a minute when I thought it was Ruth Vader...And rightly so.
6
posted on
07/20/2004 9:12:06 AM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: votelife
7
posted on
07/20/2004 9:13:25 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
To: Corin Stormhands
I read Ginsberg and thought the same thing, LOL.
Could someone explain to me how these memos might have helped the Kerry campaign?
The missing pages are about the Millenium Terror plot, and my first thought was that they were just trying to hide the facts surrounding it (because Clinton and croonies certainly embellished their part in preventing terror).
How would that help Kerry?
Inquiring minds need to know.
8
posted on
07/20/2004 9:13:34 AM PDT
by
dawn53
To: votelife
if the kerry campaign is involved in a coverup of bergers pants will it be called weinergate...
t
>jibjab.com< try it it's funny
9
posted on
07/20/2004 9:13:58 AM PDT
by
teeman8r
To: Matchett-PI
You are correct, we shouldn't be distracted from the key points of this story by more Clintonian BS.
The most important question is this: What did the missing documents say?
Everything else is designed to distract from that pertinent question.
10
posted on
07/20/2004 9:14:51 AM PDT
by
Badeye
("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
To: Corin Stormhands
I guess I'm dating myself, but I first thought of Alan or Ralph.
To: Matchett-PI
The docs were taken last October. How does that impact Kerry? Kerry does not seem to be able to plan ahead more than one photo-op at a time? I think this is pure CYA for Clinton. Berger would ONLY steal from a secure area under a dire threat: Exposure or Arkancide!
12
posted on
07/20/2004 9:17:22 AM PDT
by
maica
(Hitlary says; "We are going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good"...)
To: Matchett-PI; Howlin; Dog
Did they benefit from documents and information they should not have had?" I watched this also
Carl Cameron is reporting the Kerry Camp has no comment regarding Sandy
13
posted on
07/20/2004 9:17:54 AM PDT
by
Mo1
(50 States .... I want all 50 States come November!)
To: dawn53
You are right about the Millenium Terror thing. The only reason they caught Ressam was because an alert customs agent thought the guy looked suspicious (he was sweating profusly) and because Ressam gave two different answers to the same question just moments apart. It was blind luck, but Clinton used it as a prime (if not THE prime) example of his administrations' commitment to anti-terrorism.
To: pushforbush
"Hope the story has legs ping!" We must make sure we don't allow the media to get away with headlines like, "Former CLINTON national security advisor, Sandy Berger...blah, blah, blah".
This ties in to the KERRY campaign. The headlines should read, "Sandy Berger, advisor to the 2004 Kerry Campaign.....", etc., etc.
BTTT
15
posted on
07/20/2004 9:18:36 AM PDT
by
Matchett-PI
(All DemocRATS are either relativists, libertines or anarchists.)
To: Daveinyork
16
posted on
07/20/2004 9:18:56 AM PDT
by
byteback
To: Matchett-PI
My short list of issues that need to be adressed John Kerry.
1. How does he explain his wish to get the UN involved in Iraq in light of massive corruption, bribery, and scandal within the UN?
2. He needs to firmly oppose or support the house democrats that have called for UN intervention in our elections.
3. he needs to give some clue as to his opinions on the revelation that sandy berger was stealing classified documents.
17
posted on
07/20/2004 9:18:59 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(John kerry is unbalanced)
To: dawn53
The only thing about these documents that would help Kerry is to get Clinton and company off of his back.
I believe Kerry did not get these documents but it is guilt by association with Berger being an advisor to Kerry. The luck of Kerry.
I wonder if Kerry even knew if this investigation was going on. If he did he would have never put Berger on as an advisor.
18
posted on
07/20/2004 9:19:30 AM PDT
by
truthandlife
("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
To: Matchett-PI
[D]id Sandy Berger . . . get those documents . . . to the Kerry Campaign for their benefit?
19
posted on
07/20/2004 9:20:12 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(Nobody "inadvertently" takes sensitive docs in their pants.)
To: Matchett-PI
So David Gergen thinks this is more innocent than it looks because he knows Berger? Gergen does not yet know what motivates even the 'best' Liberal by now?
Senator Lieberman offers that it probably was inadvertant?
One only has to read Berger's statement to see the lie being crafted for public consumption.
But one thing that cannot be disguised; 'he hid them in his pockets and his socks'; inadvertantly?
Threw them out accidentally?
Go after this Liberal trickster/traitor; for all it's worth.
20
posted on
07/20/2004 9:20:49 AM PDT
by
cricket
(The starting point for Liberals is the lie. . .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-208 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson