Posted on 07/19/2004 5:07:42 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
Good analysis. I would guess his attorney is talking now because, and only because, the story leaked. They've had plenty of time to prepare...they're probably shocked it took this long for it to get out.
The more I look at this the more I'm convinced this is less Clinton and more getting specific information to Kerry. Everyone already knew Clinton was a bum on National Security but Kerry seems to have picked up a new theme on National Security. Kerry followed Bush and started talking about security in ship yards and immigration, contrary to his voting record? Kerry's not smart enough to come up with this on his own. Then there's Clarke apologizing to America for "letting them down"? This whole thing smells like it was going to be a Democrat setup on Bush but it backfired.
Sandy's not known for lying, so I guess we'll just have to trust him here.
Well, the Commission couldn't very well request documents they didn't know about, could they, hmmm? So I'd guess this is a true statement.
Perhaps, but the Clintonistas know that Ashcroft is AG now, not Reno.
I agree. I also think Berger is a weak person. FBI twist his pinkie real hard and no telling what he might reveal.
He needs a safe house with several armed guards keeping watch 24/7. I'd sure hate for him to commit suicide.
Did anyone see MSNBC this evening. They interviewed Fawn Hall about the Sandy Berger incident. Fawn ofcourse shredded the documents in Iran Contra. Remember how beautiful Fawn was in 1987. OMG, this woman looked horrible. She totally lost her looks. She totally aged badly.
Keep in mind as you watch the Dems spin this story:
Every single thing they say has been pre-programmed by the Clinton legal team. They're putting out false news stories and false "facts" trying to get ahead of the time when the real scoop comes out. When the real facts come out they'll say it's old news. It's their M.O.
Berger's defense is going to be that he's a slob who loses papers and keeps a messy desk. Watch.
Good Work, Ronnie!
Oh, what a tangled web we weave..... : )
Checking in!
I'm going outside the mainstream here to say that I think that this has less to do with the former President and his spouse than it does with the sKerry campaign; that all the references to the Clintons are merely a smoke screen. As an unpaid "security" advisor to the sKerry campaign, Berger's advice had to involve: a) the idea that Clinton/Clarke did have a handle on the terror issue that President Bush somehow screwed up (and that was the reason for taking the Clarke millenium report drafts), and b) that the former administration passed along all this information about bin Laden and al Qaeda (and their powerful connections) to the current one (the reason for returning documents that were not originally taken, in a completely lame attempt to fudge the official record). Don't you all see? Clinton doesn't matter anymore; he and his staff are all discredited nothings who simply refuse to go away gracefully. It's all about power and ABB now.
What is truly delicious is that everytime the sKerry people (Wilson, Berger) try to say that President Bush is lying; they are the ones who end up discredited. Power is more important to these people than truth or liberty. It is a grim lesson of what we are up against.
You mean he didn't stop with stuffing classifed documents into his pants?
They'd probably reply: We lack the facts to respond to that... lol
Oh. I think I know which pic you're talking about. I don't think I have saved it.I'll look and if I have it, I'll upload and send you the URL and dimensions.
If you or anyone happens onto it, send it to me and I'll save it, upload and pass it back to you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.