Velvet Revolution, USA ( Part 1)
The Robert F. Kennedy Democrats honored Kangas’s "Liberalism Resurgent" home page with their 1997 "Excelsior Award" for Web sites that "communicate the highest progressive ideals." Kangas’s site railed against Scaife in words eerily reminiscent of Hillary’s 1995 conspiracy report. On February 8, 1999, Kangas... arrived in Pittsburgh on a Greyhound bus... [c]arrying a Kel-Tek 9-mm semiautomatic pistol, forty-seven rounds of ammunition and a bottle of Jack Daniels... made a bee-line for Scaife’s office... holed up in a restroom down the hall, got drunk and shot himself in the head. If indeed Kangas intended to assassinate Scaife, he appears to have lost his nerve at the last minute.Startling, but not surprising, given the avowed tactics of Hitlery. The associates of Kerry are no better. And we know from Kerry's own testimony against himself that he committed atrocities.
George W. Bush will be reelected by a margin of at least ten per cent
The Money Trail
Rothschild is quoted as saying, "I don't care who the government is, let me control the money and I will control the country."
... And, so it goes. The enemies to your freedom do not necessarily lurk behind closed doors in Washington D.C. (although you will find many there), nor are they necessarily engaged in some nafarious conspiracy plotting the overthrow of government.
No, the enemies of your freedom live next door and are found in every city and town in America. "We have met the enemy, and they are us." And, while there is a conspiracy [An agreement, manifesting itself in words or deeds, by which two or more persons confederate to do an unlawful act, or to use unlawful to do an act which is lawful. - From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913)], they do not want to overthrow the government - they want to change government for their own agenda and they want you to pay for it.
In 1954 The Ford Foundation President H. Rowan Gaither told Norman Dodd, investigator for Congressman Reece's Committee, that their objective "was to alter our life in the United States so that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union." The Soviet Union no longer exists as we knew it. What has emerged is a much larger globalist entity.
Virtually every major name in banking from Rockefeller to Rothschild to Robert McNamara (president of The World Bank) has spoken of the reality of an interlocking global economy - that what happens on Wall Street one minute is felt in London or Tokyo the next, that the complex jigsaw puzzle of world economy is moving into an oscillating ball that will eventually unify nations and currencies in the global marketplace, and that the economic forces of the earth are moving relentlessly toward a unified world system.
If Rothschild was right about controlling the money, you control the country, then it is pretty easy to see how Communism can fail so conveniently for the New World Order and how basically the same people who were communists then, are now Socialist Democrats and still running things.
The average American Citizen isn't going to give up his Constitution for some World Government too easily. We and our ancestors have fought too long and shed too much blood for it to give up easily.
The plan is for Americans to give up their freedom willingly. Socialist reform is the only way that a one world order can be established without a direct military confrontation.
"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans ..."
Bill Clinton (USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)
http://members.tripod.com/~VicBils/index.html
Thank you for writing this.
I am glad that I read it.
NOW - I am beginning to see George Soro's motivations. They had me stumped for a while there. The atheist / anti-Christian motivation is now very obvious.
Very good articles. I look forward to reading Part III.
I found your comments about Gore very interesting. It would be hard to diagnose mental illness without being a psychiatrist or having direct contact with the patient.
Personally, I have an intuitive feeling that Gore is psychotic. I am of that opinion, because of the way 'Spotted Al' sounds. I have heard some of the tapes of of Hitler ranting, and Gore's rant actually sounds similar.
Since I am not a physician, or Psychologist, I am relying on the sensitivity of of my ears, picking up qualities, such as pitch, volume, inflexion patterns, etc. Listening to Gore, I am glad he is not President. I do not think the is stable enough to trust with the power of the Presidency.
Thanks again for sharing with us.
The Rat Digital Brownshirts live and thrive on Free Republic as old embedden Trolls/Fifth Columnists posing as the Real True Conservatives. They are the rapid response team for the liberals on Free Republic.
It is amazing how quickly they jump on a good news thread on the economy, the war in Iraq, the WOT or anything that GW does. It is obvious that their goal is derail the good news or defuse the bad news.
Whenever, Reuters, AFP/AP or the New York Slimes to the LA Slimes has a negative article/editorial or a new lie about GW, they are the first to post it. Then their cadre of Brown Shirt Jackals jump on the thread to stab GW in the back. Most recent has been the bs that Dick Cheney should resign. That started here even before the NY Slimes had their spin on Cheney resigning. One freeper posted this weekend that he supported GW, but everyone of his cabinet and advisors should resign. Even the NY Slimes didn't go that far.
Now for a quote from you re the Rat Digital Brownshirts:
"The Democrat "digital brownshirt" movement has come a long way since Kangas’s wildcatting days. Today, the movement is well-funded and tightly disciplined. Its headquarters is the Center for American Progress (CAP), a far-left think tank launched in July 2003. Headed by former Clinton Chief of Staff John Podesta and funded with $10 million from George Soros, CAP serves as the premier platform for Hillary Clinton’s political activism.
"One of CAP’s missions, according to its charter, is to run "rapid response" media campaigns, for the purpose of debunking and discrediting troublesome press reports. In this respect, CAP’s mission echoes that of the so-called "War Room" which Hillary operated during the 1992 presidential campaign. According to the Washington Post:
"The war room was set up to gather as much intelligence as possible and quickly turn it to Clinton’s advantage. Campaign advisors tried to anticipate what stories reporters were working on in hopes of shaping those stories before they were written."
"Critical to the War Room’s success was James Carville’s so-called "rapid-response team" – an elite band of spinmeisters who prided themselves on their ability to intercept a Clinton scandal report at midnight and turn it around to Clinton’s advantage by 7 am the next morning.
"In view of these facts, Al Gore's use of the term "rapid responder" becomes less mysterious. But it is the Democrats, not the Republicans, who have honed rapid media response to a science."
FYI!
Richard's part II on $oreA$$ should be required reading for all conservatives.
RP, I can never find your book at Borders.
The reply posted below is an example of the rapid response Digital Brownshirt Team working for George $orea$$, or Kerrorists for Kerry. We will probably find out that JimRob and the mods have banned this Brown Shirt Fifth Columnist several times.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1173603/posts?page=6#6
To: G.Mason
I see that this is a site with an intelligent conservative viewpoint. I hope you don't mind debating me, I'm neither Republican or Democrat-I choose from both parties, based on the abilities they bring to the office.
One thing you've said troubles me.
"Changed the tone and restored honor and dignity"?
No. There has been no effort to heal the deep divisions that threaten to tear our country apart.
The Bush administration attacks it's critics with little to no regard for the truth. (Kerry didn't try to "gut our intelligence" when he suggested we use it's surplus. Using the vote against funding for the war would have been more convincing as a vote against giving our troops body armor would have been more convincing had Bush not also done the same thing. He voted against a similiar plan that would have paid for itself through less upper class tax cuts)
More troubling has been the way the war against Iraq was sold to the world.
There was a strong humanitarian case to be made, as well as prosecuting an act of war (the assassination attempt). We had every reason to believe he might be hiding weapons.
There was no need to try to decieve the public, "honorable lies" be damned.
A CIA analysis indicated Saddam was likely to only use WMDs/give WMDs to Al Quada as a response to invasion and was censored, the opposite of what the administration claimed.
Ties between Saddam and 9/11 were hinted at, despite no evidece to support such a conclusion.
It made us look like we had something to hide, and gave Germany and France's leaders good press.
But worst of all, many Islamic moderates lost their credibility, as the fundamentalists were able to claim that it was proof that the Bush administration was leading a "crusade". (remember that to many, a crusade is a synonym for a Jihad.)
As a result of that,(and a poorly planned foreign policy attacked by such far left liberals as Sen Lugar, George Bush sr, and George Will) we lost much of the support we had after 9/11.
Only those who have a vested interest in reelecting the president have counted that as a triumph.
I hope you understand, for the rest of us, that's not good enough.
6 posted on 07/18/2004 8:03:50 AM PDT by Eye of the storm
Check the rapid response time elapsed from when Yoe posted the summary of the Good Record of JW to the when the rapid response Brown Shirt made its reply.
It's fascinating to listen for such agitprop from KCBS, an AM radio station here in the San Francisco Bay Area. I must admit: their news editor is a genius. He/she/it strings the stories together to foist an overall impression almost seamlessly. I would bet that there are meetings to get the reporters to ask the right questons to be more easily organized for effect. It doesn't take long for the other stations to have it down. One can flip channels and hear the stories almost in perfect sync.
I believe in economics the principle is called "market leadership."
bttt
never heard of the Hillary/Kangas/Scaife connection (I was not much into politics at the time)
wow.