Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal Court Sides With ACLU in Fight for Ten Commandments in Courtroom
News Journal | July 15, 2004 | News Journal Staff Report

Posted on 07/15/2004 6:39:29 PM PDT by bimboeruption

CINCINNATI -- Richland County Common Pleas Judge James DeWeese's fight to return the Ten Commandments to his courtroom wall suffered a setback Wednesday.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth District's three-judge panel ruled 2-1 that displaying the plaque violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

"We're obviously pleased with the ruling," Gary Daniels, litigation coordinator for the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, said.

A federal judge forced DeWeese to remove the Ten Commandments in 2002 after a lawsuit by the ACLU.

"We've contended such a display is offensive to the Establishment Clause and violates the separation of church and state," Daniels said.

The American Center for Law and Justice, a public-interest law firm representing DeWeese, said it was disappointed with the appellate court's ruling and will appeal further.

DeWeese also had a poster of the Bill of Rights in his Mansfield courtroom. He put the words "the rule of law" atop both posters, contending they are part of the historic foundation for modern law.

The ACLU sued to challenge the display of the Ten Commandments, arguing that its posting in a public courtroom gave it the appearance of an unconstitutional government endorsement of religion.

DeWeese failed to establish a legally permissible secular reason for displaying the Ten Commandments in the courtroom, appeals judges Joseph Hood and R. Guy Cole Jr. wrote in their majority ruling. They upheld a June 2002 decision by U.S. District Judge Kathleen O'Malley in Cleveland.

Appeals Judge Alice Batchelder dissented. Batchelder said she believes DeWeese is entitled to include the Ten Commandments in a display he uses to educate the public on the history and philosophy of law.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: aclj; aclu; constitution; establishmentclause; federaljudge; firstamendment; judgejamesdeweese; purge; tencommandments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: bimboeruption

maybe the fed judges should be ignored in this case, what can they do???


21 posted on 07/15/2004 8:45:37 PM PDT by markman46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
ACLU= Anti Christian Litigation Unlimited.


22 posted on 07/15/2004 8:46:34 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

"Wanna take the first shot?"

I think some liberal extremist will do it for me.

My God have mercy on us.


23 posted on 07/15/2004 9:42:33 PM PDT by bimboeruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson