Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senate Vote Against the Marriage Amendment (Roll Call--names, all of that)
US Senate, US Government ^ | 14JUL04 | US Government

Posted on 07/14/2004 4:45:06 PM PDT by familyop

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 108th Congress - 2nd Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the SenateVote Summary

Question: On the Cloture Motion (Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Proceed to Consider S. J. Res. 40 )
Vote Number: 155 Vote Date: July 14, 2004, 12:13 PM
Required For Majority: 3/5 Vote Result: Cloture Motion Rejected
Vote Counts: YEAs 48

NAYs 50

Not Voting 2
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Nay
Alexander (R-TN), Yea
Allard (R-CO), Yea
Allen (R-VA), Yea
Baucus (D-MT), Nay
Bayh (D-IN), Nay
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Biden (D-DE), Nay
Bingaman (D-NM), Nay
Bond (R-MO), Yea
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Breaux (D-LA), Nay
Brownback (R-KS), Yea
Bunning (R-KY), Yea
Burns (R-MT), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Yea
Campbell (R-CO), Nay
Cantwell (D-WA), Nay
Carper (D-DE), Nay
Chafee (R-RI), Nay
Chambliss (R-GA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Yea
Coleman (R-MN), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Conrad (D-ND), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Yea
Corzine (D-NJ), Nay
Craig (R-ID), Yea
Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Daschle (D-SD), Nay
Dayton (D-MN), Nay
DeWine (R-OH), Yea
Dodd (D-CT), Nay
Dole (R-NC), Yea
Domenici (R-NM), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
Durbin (D-IL), Nay
Edwards (D-NC), Not Voting
Ensign (R-NV), Yea
Enzi (R-WY), Yea
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Fitzgerald (R-IL), Yea
Frist (R-TN), Yea
Graham (D-FL), Nay
Graham (R-SC), Yea
Grassley (R-IA), Yea
Gregg (R-NH), Yea
Hagel (R-NE), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Hollings (D-SC), Nay
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Inhofe (R-OK), Yea
Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Jeffords (I-VT), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Nay
Kennedy (D-MA), Nay
Kerry (D-MA), Not Voting
Kohl (D-WI), Nay
Kyl (R-AZ), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Nay
Lieberman (D-CT), Nay
Lincoln (D-AR), Nay
Lott (R-MS), Yea
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Miller (D-GA), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Nay
Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Nay
Reid (D-NV), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Santorum (R-PA), Yea
Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Nay
Sessions (R-AL), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Smith (R-OR), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Specter (R-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Sununu (R-NH), Nay
Talent (R-MO), Yea
Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (R-VA), Yea
Wyden (D-OR), Nay
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---48
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Byrd (D-WV)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Craig (R-ID)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Fitzgerald (R-IL)
Frist (R-TN)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
McConnell (R-KY)
Miller (D-GA)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-NE)
Nickles (R-OK)
Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Specter (R-PA)
Stevens (R-AK)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
NAYs ---50
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Breaux (D-LA)
Campbell (R-CO)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Clinton (D-NY)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (D-FL)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCain (R-AZ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Sununu (R-NH)
Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 2
Edwards (D-NC)
Kerry (D-MA)

Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State
Grouped by Home State
Alabama: Sessions (R-AL), Yea Shelby (R-AL), Yea
Alaska: Murkowski (R-AK), Yea Stevens (R-AK), Yea
Arizona: Kyl (R-AZ), Yea McCain (R-AZ), Nay
Arkansas: Lincoln (D-AR), Nay Pryor (D-AR), Nay
California: Boxer (D-CA), Nay Feinstein (D-CA), Nay
Colorado: Allard (R-CO), Yea Campbell (R-CO), Nay
Connecticut: Dodd (D-CT), Nay Lieberman (D-CT), Nay
Delaware: Biden (D-DE), Nay Carper (D-DE), Nay
Florida: Graham (D-FL), Nay Nelson (D-FL), Nay
Georgia: Chambliss (R-GA), Yea Miller (D-GA), Yea
Hawaii: Akaka (D-HI), Nay Inouye (D-HI), Nay
Idaho: Craig (R-ID), Yea Crapo (R-ID), Yea
Illinois: Durbin (D-IL), Nay Fitzgerald (R-IL), Yea
Indiana: Bayh (D-IN), Nay Lugar (R-IN), Yea
Iowa: Grassley (R-IA), Yea Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Kansas: Brownback (R-KS), Yea Roberts (R-KS), Yea
Kentucky: Bunning (R-KY), Yea McConnell (R-KY), Yea
Louisiana: Breaux (D-LA), Nay Landrieu (D-LA), Nay
Maine: Collins (R-ME), Nay Snowe (R-ME), Nay
Maryland: Mikulski (D-MD), Nay Sarbanes (D-MD), Nay
Massachusetts: Kennedy (D-MA), Nay Kerry (D-MA), Not Voting
Michigan: Levin (D-MI), Nay Stabenow (D-MI), Nay
Minnesota: Coleman (R-MN), Yea Dayton (D-MN), Nay
Mississippi: Cochran (R-MS), Yea Lott (R-MS), Yea
Missouri: Bond (R-MO), Yea Talent (R-MO), Yea
Montana: Baucus (D-MT), Nay Burns (R-MT), Yea
Nebraska: Hagel (R-NE), Yea Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Nevada: Ensign (R-NV), Yea Reid (D-NV), Nay
New Hampshire: Gregg (R-NH), Yea Sununu (R-NH), Nay
New Jersey: Corzine (D-NJ), Nay Lautenberg (D-NJ), Nay
New Mexico: Bingaman (D-NM), Nay Domenici (R-NM), Yea
New York: Clinton (D-NY), Nay Schumer (D-NY), Nay
North Carolina: Dole (R-NC), Yea Edwards (D-NC), Not Voting
North Dakota: Conrad (D-ND), Nay Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
Ohio: DeWine (R-OH), Yea Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Oklahoma: Inhofe (R-OK), Yea Nickles (R-OK), Yea
Oregon: Smith (R-OR), Yea Wyden (D-OR), Nay
Pennsylvania: Santorum (R-PA), Yea Specter (R-PA), Yea
Rhode Island: Chafee (R-RI), Nay Reed (D-RI), Nay
South Carolina: Graham (R-SC), Yea Hollings (D-SC), Nay
South Dakota: Daschle (D-SD), Nay Johnson (D-SD), Nay
Tennessee: Alexander (R-TN), Yea Frist (R-TN), Yea
Texas: Cornyn (R-TX), Yea Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Utah: Bennett (R-UT), Yea Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Vermont: Jeffords (I-VT), Nay Leahy (D-VT), Nay
Virginia: Allen (R-VA), Yea Warner (R-VA), Yea
Washington: Cantwell (D-WA), Nay Murray (D-WA), Nay
West Virginia: Byrd (D-WV), Yea Rockefeller (D-WV), Nay
Wisconsin: Feingold (D-WI), Nay Kohl (D-WI), Nay
Wyoming: Enzi (R-WY), Yea Thomas (R-WY), Yea
Vote Summary By Senator Name By Vote Position By Home State


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: amendment; bush; call; catholic; christian; election; family; fma; gaymarriagevote; homosexual; marriage; protestant; republican; roll; rollcall; votes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: asmith92008
Actually, it's neither. Almost all legislation is based on some form of morality. That's not an issue. What I oppose is the micromanagement of individual behavior.

I want governent to have a clear and compelling case to remove a decision from an individual, and legislate the outcome. I greatly fear a nanny state that intrudes upon every facet of my life with what's 'good' for me.

21 posted on 07/14/2004 5:16:10 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dubya
"WOW! Great post. I wish it had of passed. Maybe they will try again."

Thank you! We will! I'll continue organizing the alienated dads to help, also. ...time to get to writing on the piece against liberaltarianism now. [Hint: see socialist "gradualism" or "incrementalism."]

;-)
22 posted on 07/14/2004 5:19:08 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

The you can't legislate morality camp is no more misinformed than the camp that wants to legislate every aspect of morality.


23 posted on 07/14/2004 5:20:51 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: forAmericasFutureVoteBush
A two-thirds vote in each house of Congress is needed to pass a constitutional amendment (or two-thirds of the 50 state legislatures need to call for a constitutional convention). Once passed by the Congress or a constitutional convention, a proposed amendment goes out to the states for ratification. It takes passage in three-fourths of the states to ratify.

In the senate, you need 60 votes to reach the required two-thirds, a nearly impossible hurdle in modern times.

24 posted on 07/14/2004 5:24:48 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Get off your duffs and VOTE for Bush-Cheney in Nov. Your life may depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mkj6080
"If this marriage issue is so important as people claim then the voters in the Red States must punish the Demos who voted against this!!! I guess South Dakota will be the test!!!"

That's the best answer I've seen here!

Don't allow the liberaltarians to trick us away from the polls with their demoralization propaganda! We could very well see some Democrat senators leaving their offices to make way for morally conservative Republicans now.

There were only six Republicans among the traitors against family, and I know that at least one of them is about to be replaced by a moral conservative.

Passing the Marriage Amendment in the Senate the next time around is a real possibility.

And as Little Jeremiah just wrote in another thread, "Let's Roll!"
25 posted on 07/14/2004 5:32:52 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Do you belive that morality is not legislated?


26 posted on 07/14/2004 5:34:41 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
"In the senate, you need 60 votes to reach the required two-thirds, a nearly impossible hurdle in modern times."

You must not have seen what recently happened in Oregon and other states. It's very likely that some of the Democrats will lose their seats now as a result of their votes against the Amendment.
27 posted on 07/14/2004 5:35:58 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Wow! Specter voted yea. He must be afraid of us.


28 posted on 07/14/2004 5:36:49 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season ( if there is a season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forAmericasFutureVoteBush

Hanoi got to him.


29 posted on 07/14/2004 5:38:08 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season ( if there is a season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: familyop
It's very likely that some of the Democrats will lose their seats now as a result of their votes against the Amendment.

I sure hope this comes to pass, but will believe it when I see it.

30 posted on 07/14/2004 5:38:51 PM PDT by Wolfstar (Get off your duffs and VOTE for Bush-Cheney in Nov. Your life may depend on it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Sununu and Judd on the vote........

N.H. Senators Split On Same-Sex Marriage Amendment

Sununu Votes With Democrats To Kill Debate

POSTED: 3:19 pm EDT July 14, 2004

New Hampshire's Republican senators were on opposite sides Wednesday in a vote that defeated a proposed constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

Sen. John Sununu was one of six Republicans who joined 43 Democrats and one independent opposed to keeping the measure alive. Sen. Judd Gregg was one of 45 Republicans and three Democrats, and the only New Englander, who voted to keep it going, falling 12 votes short of the 60 needed to continue.

Supporters of the amendment conceded in advance they would fail to win the support needed to advance the measure.

Gregg had no further comment beyond a statement Tuesday saying he will support "language which would define marriage as between one man and one woman," a spokeswoman said. He initially said an amendment was "premature."

"Defining marriage is a power that should be left to the states," Sununu said in a statement following the vote. "Moreover, no state should be forced to recognize a marriage that is not within its own laws, Constitution, and legal precedents.

"Naturally, there exist concerns about what activist courts might do to undermine these rights and the Defense of Marriage Act, signed by President Clinton in 1996," Sununu added. "But it is premature to amend the Constitution based upon a hypothetical scenario. Furthermore, the language proposed in the Senate would take the responsibility for defining marriage away from the states -- an approach which contradicts the intent of the Defense of Marriage Act."

At issue in the Senate was an amendment providing that marriage within the United States "shall consist only of a man and a woman."

A second sentence said that neither the federal nor any state constitution "shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman." Some critics argue that the effect of that provision would be to ban civil unions, and its inclusion in the amendment complicated efforts by GOP leaders to gain support from wavering Republicans.

President George W. Bush had urged Congress last February to approve a constitutional amendment, saying it was needed to stop judges from changing the definition of the "most enduring human institution."

"I believe marriage should be recognized as a legal union between a man and a woman," Sununu said. "If activist judges attempt to strike down the Defense of Marriage Act or force states to recognize non-traditional marriages endorsed by other states, I will support legislation that returns this power to the people as the framers of the Constitution so clearly intended."


31 posted on 07/14/2004 5:43:48 PM PDT by deport (Please Flush the Johns......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar

Ha! All those Know-Nothings care about is that they belong to a union and their parents voted demorat. They've been subverted by the Church (BTW I AM Catholic) and the public schools.


32 posted on 07/14/2004 5:43:55 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Rick Nash will score 50 goals this season ( if there is a season)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: familyop

The part that is disturbing is the fact that there shall be no political consequences visited upon those who rejected the amendment. If the topic is crime and vice those in the executive, legislative and judicial branches will vote to uphold, crime and vice! Further, all manner of big words shall be used to support their position i.e. justice, rights, equality, dignity etc. etc. We are on our own.


33 posted on 07/14/2004 5:55:23 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS; little jeremiah
Heh, heh. The vote was really very much along party lines.

Here's a list of the Democrats who voted in favor of the Marriage Amendment.

Byrd (D-WV)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-NE)

And here's the list of Democrats to be defeated.

Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Breaux (D-LA)
Campbell (R-CO)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Clinton (D-NY)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corzine (D-NJ)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dayton (D-MN)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (D-FL)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Inouye (D-HI)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
McCain (R-AZ)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Schumer (D-NY)
Snowe (R-ME)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Sununu (R-NH)
Wyden (D-OR)
Not Voting - 2
Edwards (D-NC)
Kerry (D-MA)

34 posted on 07/14/2004 6:30:31 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07

Not all morality is legislated. You couldn't build warehouses to hold the law books fast enough if you attempted to codify every aspect of moral behavior.


35 posted on 07/14/2004 6:38:36 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Can yo give an example of what you consider not micromanaging your life and what is micromanaging your life?
36 posted on 07/14/2004 7:21:38 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher

Sununu is anything but a RINO. Sununu was the only one who had the balls to stand up to the big government republicans and vote against the Medicare Prescription drug debacle. 95% rating from the ACU. Sununu is a great conservative. He is young, and has quite a future ahead of him.


37 posted on 07/14/2004 7:42:11 PM PDT by icebats22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: familyop

Arkansas and Louisiana Senators are definitely not representing their constiuency. Definitely needs to be made a major issues there.


38 posted on 07/14/2004 8:34:32 PM PDT by Reagan79 (Pro Life! Pro Family! Pro Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Not all morality is legislated but all legislation is based on morality. A society's laws are the morals it decides to bind itself with. Surely you don't think that marriage, the most fundamental building block of our society, should not be codified?
39 posted on 07/14/2004 9:33:40 PM PDT by asmith92008 (If we buy into the nonsense that we always have to vote for RINOs, we'll just end up taking the horn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: asmith92008

Actually, no, I think marriage should be privatized. Marriage is a personal matter, and often a religious matter. I think it would be better of if government didn't recognize the institution at all.


40 posted on 07/15/2004 10:44:40 AM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson