Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Pornography Plague
Leadership U ^ | Kerby Anderson

Posted on 07/14/2004 7:46:19 AM PDT by Tailgunner Joe

Pornography is tearing apart the very fabric of our society. Yet Christians are often ignorant of its impact and apathetic about the need to control this menace.

Pornography is an $8 billion a year business with close ties to organized crime.(1) The wages of sin are enormous when pornography is involved. Purveyors of pornography reap enormous profits through sales in so-called "adult bookstores" and viewing of films and live acts at theaters.

Pornography involves books, magazines, videos, and devices and has moved from the periphery of society into the mainstream through the renting of video cassettes, sales of so-called "soft-porn" magazines, and the airing of sexually explicit movies on cable television. To some, pornography is nothing more than a few pictures of scantily-clad women in seductive poses. But pornography has become much more than just photographs of nude women.

Nearly 900 theaters show pornographic films and more than 15,000 "adult" bookstores and video stores offer pornographic material. Adult bookstores outnumber McDonald's restaurants in the United States by a margin of at least three to one.(2) In 1985, nearly 100 full-length pornographic films were distributed to "adult" theaters providing estimated annual box office sales of $50 million.(3)

Definitions

The 1986 Attorney General Commission on Pornography defined pornography as material that "is predominantly sexually explicit and intended primarily for the purpose of sexual arousal." Hard core pornography "is sexually explicit in the extreme, and devoid of any other apparent content or purpose."(4) Another important term is the definition of obscenity. The current legal definition of obscenity is found in the 1973 case of Miller v. California. "According to the Miller case, material is obscene if all three of the following conditions are met:

1. The average person, applying contemporary community standards, would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interests.
2. The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state (or federal) law, and
3. The work taken as a whole, lacks serious, artistic, political or scientific value.(5)

Types of Pornography

The first type of pornography is adult magazines. These are primarily directed toward an adult male audience (but not exclusively). The magazines which have the widest distribution (e.g., Playboy, Penthouse) do not violate the Miller standard of obscenity and thus can be legally distributed. But other magazines which do violate these standards are still readily available in many adult bookstores.

The second type of pornography is video cassettes. These are rented or sold in most adult bookstores and have become a growth industry for pornography. People who would never go into an adult bookstore or theater to watch a pornographic movie will obtain these video cassettes through bookstores or in the mail and watch them in the privacy of their homes. Usually these videos display a high degree of hard core pornography and illegal acts.

The third type of pornography is motion pictures. Ratings standards are being relaxed and many pornographic movies are being shown and distributed carrying R and NC-17 ratings. Many of these so-called "hard R" rated films would have been considered obscene just a decade ago.

A fourth type of pornography is television. As in motion pictures, standards for commercial television have been continuously lowered. But cable television poses an even greater threat. The FCC does not regulate cable in the same way it does public access stations. Thus, many pornographic movies are shown on cable television. Like video cassettes, cable TV provides the average person with easy access to pornographic material. People who would never go to an adult bookstore can now view the same sexually explicit material in the privacy of their homes, making cable TV "the ultimate brown wrapper."

A fifth type of pornography is cyberporn. Hard core pictures, movies, online chat, and even live sex acts can be downloaded and viewed by virtually anyone through the Internet. Sexually explicit images can be found on web pages and in news groups and are far too easy for anyone of any age to view. What was only available to a small number of people willing to drive to the bad side of town can now be viewed at any time in the privacy of one's home.

A final type of pornography is audio porn. This includes "Dial-a- porn" telephone calls which are the second fastest growth market of pornography. Although most of the messages are within the Miller definition of obscenity, these businesses continue to thrive and are often used most by children.

According to Henry Boatwright (Chairman of the U.S. Advisory Board for Social Concerns), approximately 70 percent of the pornographic magazines sold end up in the hands of minors. Women Against Pornography estimate that about 1.2 million children are annually exploited in commercial sex (child pornography and prostitution).

Psychological Effects

Psychologist Edward Donnerstein (University of Wisconsin) found that brief exposure to violent forms of pornography can lead to anti-social attitudes and behavior. Male viewers tend to be more aggressive toward women, less responsive to pain and suffering of rape victims, and more willing to accept various myths about rape.(6)

Researchers have found that pornography (especially violent pornography) can produce an array of undesirable effects such as rape and sexual coercion. Specifically they found that such exposure can lead to increased use of coercion or rape,(7) increased fantasies about rape,(8) and desensitization to sexual violence and trivialization of rape.(9)

In an attempt to isolate the role of violence as distinct from sex in pornography-induced situations, James Check (York University in Canada) conducted an experiment where men were exposed to different degrees of pornography, some violent, some not. All groups exhibited the same shift in attitude, namely a higher inclination to use force as part of sex.(10)

In one study, researchers Dolf Zillman and Jennings Bryant investigated the effects of nonviolent pornography on sexual callousness and the trivialization of rape. They showed that continued exposure to pornography had serious adverse effects on beliefs about sexuality in general and on attitudes toward women in particular. They also found that pornography desensitizes people to rape as a criminal offense.(11) These researchers also found that massive exposure to pornography encourages a desire for increasingly deviant materials which involve violence (sadomasochism and rape).(12)

Dolf Zillman measured the impact of viewing pornography on the subjects' views as to what constitutes normal sexual practice. The group that saw the largest amount of pornography gave far higher estimates of the incidence of oral sex, anal sex, group sex, sado- masochism, and bestiality than did the other two groups.(13)

One study demonstrated that pornography can diminish a person's sexual happiness.(14) The researchers found that people exposed to nonviolent pornography reported diminished satisfaction with their sexual partner's physical appearance, affection, curiosity, and sexual performance. They were also more inclined to put more importance on sex without emotional involvement.

In a nationwide study, University of New Hampshire researchers Larry Baron and Murray Strauss found a strong statistical correlation between circulation rates of pornographic magazines and rape rates.(15) They found that in states with high circulation rates, rape rates were also high. And in states with low circulation rates, rape rates also tended to be low as well.

Of course, a statistical correlation does not prove that pornography causes rape. Certainly not everyone who uses pornography becomes a rapist. And it is possible that rape and pornographic consumption are only indirectly related through other factors, like social permissiveness and "macho" attitudes among men. In fact, Baron and Strauss did examine some of these factors in their study and did not find any significant correlation.

Subsequent studies have had similar results. Ohio State University researchers Joseph Scott (a man who testifies frequently for pornographers in court) and Loretta Schwalm examined even more factors than Baron and Strauss (including the circulation of non- sexual magazines) and could not eliminate the correlation between pornography and rape.(16)

Michigan state police detective Darrell Pope found that in 41 percent of the 38,000 sexual assault cases in Michigan (1956 1979), pornographic material was viewed just prior to or during the crime. This corroborates with research done by psychotherapist David Scott who found that "half the rapists studied used pornography to arouse themselves immediately prior to seeking out a victim."(17)

Social Effects

Defining the social effects of pornography has been difficult because of some of the prevailing theories of its impact. One view was that it actually performs a positive function in society by acting like a "safety-value" for potential sexual offenders.

The most famous proponent of this view was Berl Kutchinsky, a criminologist at the University of Copenhagen. His famous study on pornography found that when the Danish government lifted restrictions on pornography, the number of sex crimes decreased.(18) His theory was that the availability of pornography siphons off dangerous sexual impulses. But when the data for his "safety valve" theory was further evaluated, many of his research flaws began to show.

For example, Kutchinsky failed to distinguish between different kinds of sex crimes (e.g., rape, indecent exposure, etc.) and instead merely lumped them together. This effectively masked an increase in rape statistics. He also failed to take into account that increased tolerance for certain crimes (e.g., public nudity, sex with a minor) may have contributed to a drop in the reported crimes.

Proving cause and effect in pornography is virtually impossible because ethically researchers cannot do certain kinds of research. Researcher Dolf Zillman says, "Men cannot be placed at risk of developing sexually violent inclinations by extensive exposure to violent or nonviolent pornography, and women cannot be placed at risk of becoming victims of such inclinations."(19)

Deborah Baker, a legal assistant and executive director of an anti-obscenity group, agrees that conclusively proving a connection between pornography and crime would be very difficult:

The argument that there are no established studies showing a connection between pornography and violent crime is merely a smokescreen. Those who promote this stance well know that such research will never be done. It would require a sampling of much more than a thousand males, exposed to pornography through puberty and adolescence, while the other group is totally isolated from its influence in all its forms and varying degrees. Each group would then have to be monitored through the commission of violent crimes or not. In spite of the lack of formal research, though, the FBI's own statistics show that pornography is found at 80 percent of the scenes of violent sex crimes, or in the homes of the perpetrators.(20)

Nevertheless, there are a number of compelling statistics that suggest that pornography does have profound social consequences. For example, of the 1400 child sexual molestation cases in Louisville, Kentucky, between July 1980 and February 1984, adult pornography was connected with each incident and child pornography with the majority of them.(21) Extensive interviews with sex offenders (rapists, incest offenders, and child molesters) have uncovered a sizable percentage of offenders who use pornography to arouse themselves prior to and during their assaults.(22) Police officers have seen the impact pornography has had on serial murders. In fact, pornography consumption is one of the most common profile characteristics of serial murders and rapists.(23)

Professor Cass Sunstein, writing in the Duke Law Journal, says that some sexual violence against women "would not have occurred but for the massive circulation of pornography." Citing cross-cultural data, he concludes:

The liberalization of pornography laws in the United States, Britain, Australia, and the Scandinavian countries has been accompanied by a rise in reported rape rates. In countries where pornography laws have not been liberalized, there has been a less steep rise in reported rapes. And in countries where restrictions have been adopted, reported rapes have decreased.(24)

In his introduction to a reprint of the Final Report of the Attorney General's Commission on Pornography, columnist Michael McManus noted that

The FBI interviewed two dozen sex murderers in prison who had killed multiple numbers of times. Some eighty-one percent said their biggest sexual interest was in reading pornography. They acted out sex fantasies on real people. For example, Arthur Gary Bishop, convicted of sexually abusing and killing five young boys said, "If pornographic material would have been unavailable to me in my early states, it is most probable that my sexual activities would not have escalated to the degree they did." He said pornography's impact on him was "devastating. . . . I am a homosexual pedophile convicted of murder, and pornography was a determining factor in my downfall."(25)

Dr. James Dobson interviewed Ted Bundy, one of this nation's most notorious serial killers. On the day before his execution, Ted Bundy said that the "most damaging kinds of pornography are those that involve violence and sexual violence. Because the wedding of those two forces, as I know only too well, brings about behavior that is just, just too terrible to describe."(26)

Censorship and Freedom of Speech

Attempts to regulate and outlaw pornography within a community are frequently criticized as censorship and a violation of the First Amendment. But the Supreme Court clearly stated in Roth v. United States (1957) that obscenity was not protected by the First Amendment. Federal, state, and local laws apply to the sale, display, distribution, and broadcast of pornography. Pornographic material, therefore, can be prohibited if it meets the legal definition of obscenity.

The Supreme Court ruled in the case of Miller v. California (1973) that a legal definition of obscenity must meet the three-part test we previously discussed. If it appeals to the prurient interest, is patently offensive, and lacks serious value (artistically, etc.) then the material is considered obscene and is illegal.

The Supreme Court further ruled in Paris Adult Theatre v. Slaton (1973) that material legally defined as obscene is not accorded the same protection as free speech in the First Amendment. The court ruled that even if obscene films are shown only to "consenting adults," this did not grant them immunity from the law.

In the case of New York v. Ferber (1982), the Supreme Court ruled that child pornography was not protected under the First Amendment even if it was not legally defined as obscene under their three- part test. Since children cannot legally consent to sexual relations, child pornography constitutes sexual abuse. Congress also passed the Child Protection Act in 1984 which provided tougher restrictions on child pornography.

Cable television is presently unregulated since it is not technically "broadcasting" as defined in the Federal Communications Act. Thus, cable television is able to show pornographic movies with virtual impunity. The FCC Act needs to be amended so that the FCC can regulate cable television.

(Excerpt) Read more at leaderu.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: boobiesscareme; churchlady; culturewar; demeaningwomen; deviance; hedonism; hedonists; ihateboobies; libertinarians; libertines; lustoftheflesh; moralchaos; nannystate; nowlovesyou; perversion; playboyphilosophy; porn; pornography; protectchildren; protectwomen; sexindustry; sexualperversion; sexworkers; tjwasadrunk; writingsonthewall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 721-739 next last
To: superiorslots
BULLSH*T!! Every highway exit has a McDonalds. I don't see 3 porno shops at every highway exit. One every so often though.

They're probably counting every mom 'n pop video rental shop with an adult section as a porno shop, as well as every magazine stand that carries "Playboy."

Lies, damned lies, and statistics.

561 posted on 07/14/2004 3:36:46 PM PDT by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fleer
Those who, in their hearts, despise freedom and free will, will never give up trying to "save us from ourselves".

Fortunately, history, facts, law, and the Constitution offer ample rebuttal to their claims.

562 posted on 07/14/2004 3:37:51 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
No, you don't get it. The poster made the correct claim that with the end of alcohol prohibition the gangs related to the illegal production of, smuggling, and control of the distribution of illegal alcohol went away. They did.

You then tried to claim that since the crips and bloods are shooting eachother up in LA that the gangs didn't go away.

563 posted on 07/14/2004 3:37:52 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Just find out the number of McDonalds there were in 1984 and the number of adult bookstores there were in 1984, and get back to me.

If I believe your sources then I will admit the claim is incorrect.

564 posted on 07/14/2004 3:38:04 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut; Poohbah; Modernman; Bella_Bru; Junior; Phantom Lord; TheBigB; cyborg; NCPAC; tpaine

LC, et alia,

these self-described "conservative" anti-porn crusaders are no more or less than statists on a religious or quasi-religious "moral" power trip. On the internet, such True Believing folk thrive on wasting the time and efforts of others.

wasting someone's time is committing murder in miniature.
to waste one's own time in fruitless debate with them is thus serial suicide on the same small scale.

don't bother with them any longer, LongCut, unless they disrupt an otherwise productive thread. Petty little vipers like these are not worthy of serious consideration, nor are they deserving of the courtesy of reasoned debate. They are immune to both, anyway. Their Shields of Vainglory protect them from all inconvenient facts and contradicting evidence.

Just let them wallow in benighted idiocy.
If they ever become a problem in the real world, there are contingencies ready to be enacted.


565 posted on 07/14/2004 3:38:24 PM PDT by King Prout (Viggo Bozodozeus is your friend... Viggo Bozodozeus deserves all trust... submit to Viggo Bozodozeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah

Anyone who would rebel against the government if it banned born is not just sick, they're pathetic.


566 posted on 07/14/2004 3:40:04 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
"Umm...I DID refute it, in the post linked."

I cited a news story. The wording was straight from the article. Yet #1, you call it a lie and, #2, you refute it? Right. Your lie #1.

567 posted on 07/14/2004 3:41:57 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Just find out the number of McDonalds there were in 1984 and the number of adult bookstores there were in 1984, and get back to me.

Is there any other topic you would like to discuss that you would like to use 20 year old testimony before the Senate as the basis for your argument?

If, as has been posted on this thread that today there are less than 2,000 "Adult Bookstores", which is an industry number, is true, then it is safe to assume that number was less 20 years ago and the industry has done nothing but grow rapidly. So, lets assume that there were 2,000 back then as well. That means that there would have to have been 667 McDonalds in America in 1984. It is rediculous to think there were only 667 McDonalds in the US back then.

568 posted on 07/14/2004 3:43:12 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe; nunya bidness; diotima; feinswinesuksass; HangFire; dead; Bob J
FWIW... I was at the salon today and flipped through two magazines I don't normally read -- Elle and Jane. The former was lauding the launching of two wimmin's sex networks, and the latter touted Netflix-style porn-DVD delivery services. (It even recommended the hot "stars" to "not miss".)

569 posted on 07/14/2004 3:43:16 PM PDT by AnnaZ ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." :::Hillar(ed)y!::: 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

Take it up with them.


Well now . Perhaps you can apply the same decision when you complain that the Judicial Branch and LE not enforcing laws ? Damn heavy pot you lug around here lately .


570 posted on 07/14/2004 3:44:09 PM PDT by Ben Bolt ( " The Spenders " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Even that number came from 1997.

Do you know how to do research of your own?

571 posted on 07/14/2004 3:46:36 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: swampfox98

a business which debases women and destroys children.


your assertion is WAY overbroad.

prove it about all of these legal businesses.
don't waate our time with your rants that assert it MUST BE SO BECAUSE DR. so-and-so, said it was this way or that.
don't opine it... via a third party. and don't point at a religious bunch of kooks who say it's so.

prove it.
That means double blind, with large control group TESTS only. Did you know that 95 percent of rapists have consumed milk in their lifetimes? What a correlation I have discovered!

The "you hate morality" accusations directed at "free speech" advocates around here these days are becoming quite ridiculous. What we are really looking at are the ongoing FALSE ASSERTIONS by the rabid opponents of personal freedom and long-accepted American liberties. These are the folks who think that "prohibition was a GREAT IDEA that could have worked... if only."

These are folks who in general believe that Blockbuster Video is a porn shop, short skirts are "whore clothing" and women who go out in public with bare legs are "trolling" for sex."

Talk about debasing the culture!
Such proclivity to push such agenda based Distortions and LIES as facts, ARE the debasement... not a National Geographic magazine, or a sealed "playboy" magazine on the top shelf, with a naked woman covered by the packaging, on the cover, at your local Barnes and Noble.

These folks are out of the mainstream extremists. And they are flat wrong. But they are not alone in the World.

I hear the taliban are hiring.
A shortage in their upper level leadership has created a vacuum for fresh blood... folks with truly Godly and moral convictions who are ready to enforce their morality on others at gunpoint if need be, to SAVE the nation. It also looks like some pseudoconservatives around here of the religious/socialist variety are ready to step into the void.

The problem is that if the wrong group of socialist/freespeech limitors gets in power, WE will be the ones who will be silenced with our designations of being a " hate speech group."

We need to castigate the nannystate. Not expand and reinforce it.

EXTREMELY limited government is true conservatism... not this constant expansion of these morality enforcing monstrosities that can be turned against us all in a moment by the whim of some tyrannical leader in the not-too-distant the future.


572 posted on 07/14/2004 3:47:37 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

It also came from a different source than the one that made the McDonald's claim, a source likely to take a narrower view of the definition of an adult bookstore.


573 posted on 07/14/2004 3:48:47 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: King Prout
I almost didn't bother with this again, KP. We dealt quite well with it last night, and WE GET THE POINT, already! TJ and his cronies hate picture of attractive people having sex, and likewise hate those who enjoy them. They create of whole cloth reasons to make laws against them, based on their irrationality, and in no small amount their basic hatred of real freedom. What more was to be said?

However, we are in a situation right now where this false form of conservatism must be countered, vigourously, because it has the effect of driving away voters that might support REAL conservatism, because it plays into the hands of those who denounce us all as "religious nuts" who ALL want to impose a theocracy on America. Due to the crucial nature of this election, I felt it best to help prove that they are in no way representative of the vast majority of sensible, reasoned people on the Right who do not wish to limit the liberties of others, even if they do not personally like what others do with that liberty.

I was taught early on that those freedoms contained in the Constitution had a corollary...that they might be used in a manner we might NOT like, but that was no reason to abridge them. We cannot "cherry-pick" which freedoms and Liberties we will and will not support.

The statement that "I might disagree with what you say (do, photograph, publish, film, etc.), but I will defend with my life your right to say it" has regrettably fallen from the minds of those who persist in this debate. I wish to make it clear that SOME of us still believe it.

574 posted on 07/14/2004 3:48:58 PM PDT by Long Cut (The Constitution...the NATOPS of America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

post 571 meant for you.


575 posted on 07/14/2004 3:49:37 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2

*applause*


576 posted on 07/14/2004 3:49:59 PM PDT by King Prout (Viggo Bozodozeus is your friend... Viggo Bozodozeus deserves all trust... submit to Viggo Bozodozeus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: King Prout

good points all.
good advice.


577 posted on 07/14/2004 3:50:20 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2 (the madridification of our election is now officially underway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
"Oh, and let's not forget your contention (since debunked) that rape increased as legal porn did"

That was the author's contention which I simply used as an example. Your lie #2.

"or your refusal to admit that porn is legal"

I refused to admit that porn was legal? You've got to be kidding me! Lie #3.

"or that the amount of kiddie porn (which is now illegal) would increase if mainstream porn were made "more legal".

It is my opinion that as porn is mainstreamed into our culture and made more available and less expensive, porn producers will move to kiddie porn to make money. I never knew than an opinion on this board is considered a lie if someone else disagree with it.

If that's the criteria, then you LIE big time.

578 posted on 07/14/2004 3:51:02 PM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 520 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It also came from a different source than the one that made the McDonald's claim, a source likely to take a narrower view of the definition of an adult bookstore.

Do you think your source used as the basis of their definition what most people think of when they hear the term "adult bookstore"?

579 posted on 07/14/2004 3:52:13 PM PDT by tacticalogic ( Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

He really likes to project his flaws onto others, doesn't he?


580 posted on 07/14/2004 3:52:21 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe (You CAN legislate morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 578 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 721-739 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson