That was the author's contention which I simply used as an example. Your lie #2.
"or your refusal to admit that porn is legal"
I refused to admit that porn was legal? You've got to be kidding me! Lie #3.
"or that the amount of kiddie porn (which is now illegal) would increase if mainstream porn were made "more legal".
It is my opinion that as porn is mainstreamed into our culture and made more available and less expensive, porn producers will move to kiddie porn to make money. I never knew than an opinion on this board is considered a lie if someone else disagree with it.
If that's the criteria, then you LIE big time.
He really likes to project his flaws onto others, doesn't he?
You repeated the lie as fact, and then bactracked when this was pointed out. Classic spin (lies).
"I refused to admit that porn was legal? You've got to be kidding me! Lie #3."
You would not, though offered numerous opportunities, to define or clarify your statements about "illegal porn", by your own admission because you could not do so and have it stand up to scruitiny. Cowardly.
"It is my opinion that as porn is mainstreamed into our culture and made more available and less expensive, porn producers will move to kiddie porn to make money. I never knew than an opinion on this board is considered a lie if someone else disagree with it."
Your opinion was shown to be fallacious and unsupportable. Nonetheless, you persisted in cleaving to it.
Do yourself a favor...quit digging your credibility's grave. It's deep enough, and its corpse is starting to rot.
By that remarkable turn of logic, WalMart should be the world's largest producer of child pornography.
Actually, your contention was the opposite. You contended that if current mainstream porn was made illegal, those who are currently producing said porn would turn to child porn to make a buck.