Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MOORE CAN'T FOOL THE WHO
New York Post - Page Six ^ | 7/13/04 | Richard Johnson with Paula Froelich and Chris Wilson

Posted on 07/12/2004 11:26:22 PM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: kattracks
…"We had better get you women some birth control, there are so many of you here!" Yikes.

The time for birth control was when their mothers were sexually active.
21 posted on 07/13/2004 4:30:07 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica
She's a slob in every way. A loose cannon. Frankly, she acts like a drunk.......

You might have something there. Her hair always seems to flopping in front of her face. She's often semi disheveled. Maybe she is tippling during daytime. With all her billions she is surrounded by flunkies who don't dare criticize her. Just look how she got John his very own flunky butler



That's the butler's back ....making himself useful.

22 posted on 07/13/2004 4:39:45 AM PDT by dennisw (Once is Happenstance. Twice is Coincidence. The third time is Enemy action. - Ian Fleming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: olde north church

i concur... if one had to be born on any day, that one is ideal... spoken from personal experience...

teeman


23 posted on 07/13/2004 5:36:53 AM PDT by teeman8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Bump!


24 posted on 07/13/2004 6:13:10 AM PDT by F-117A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

I used to think that, but there are only two times Democrats surprise me. One is when I think, "they can't sink any lower", and the other is when I think, "surely the American people aren't stupid enough to believe that." There are some watershed events that completely change your perception in life. When Al Gore got a huge bump in the polls out of swallowing Tipper's tongue during the last DNC convention, I started seriously worrying about the US. BTW, I teach college, and less than 2% of my students can tell you what the fourth amendment to the Constitution says. About 60% can tell you both numbers Michael Jordan wore (at least they could three years ago. Jordan's old news now).


25 posted on 07/13/2004 6:26:10 AM PDT by Richard Kimball (We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men are ready to do violence on our behalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Regarding the Theresa snip..it really surprises me she hasnt polished her look. I find her appearance "messy". Her hair is always in her face and looks dry and slightly frizzy and in need of a trim. Her clothes, while I'm sure expensive, look rumpled. Her eyebrows are too harsh and need to be defined and her eyes should be played up as they are very expressive but not noticed because of all of the hair and eyebrows going on. Theresa needs a SERIOUS makeover.


26 posted on 07/13/2004 7:18:24 AM PDT by FeliciaCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: veronica

...she acts like a drunk.

&&
I have noted more than once that she often looks hammered.


27 posted on 07/13/2004 7:54:36 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: garylmoore

With a penchant for cruising kiddie web sites...


28 posted on 07/13/2004 7:57:10 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tdadams

And doesn't she always look annoyed as hell whenever John Kerry touches her?

&&
I'll bet she was glad when they brought in Edwards, the airline stewardess, so Kerry would have someone else to be the object of his affections.


29 posted on 07/13/2004 7:57:24 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: garylmoore

isn't Pete Townsend the guy who was charged with child pornography?


30 posted on 07/13/2004 7:58:30 AM PDT by Hildy ( If you don't stand up for what's RIGHT, you'll settle for what's LEFT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Moore would do wise to consider "We decide, and the shotgun sings its song".


31 posted on 07/13/2004 8:00:57 AM PDT by Badeye ("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Charged but not convicted. From what I remember he was arrested because he had visited child pornography sites on the web. His defense was that he was "researching" pornography for some reason or another.

Yea, researching, that's the ticket!


32 posted on 07/13/2004 8:05:15 AM PDT by Republican Red (“‘I could give you an answer to that question if you give me a little time to think about it.’)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: olde north church

That is so outstanding! Puts it in perspective when you see the victims....


33 posted on 07/13/2004 8:24:13 AM PDT by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: garylmoore

I thought he got into trouble with kiddie porn?


34 posted on 07/13/2004 8:25:30 AM PDT by Milligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Milligan

I think Townsend also said he was molested as a kid, which often leads to problems later in life.

Too bad he didn't give Moore permission, then the headline could have read:

The Who Sells Out

and everything would have come full circle.


35 posted on 07/13/2004 8:35:38 AM PDT by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Milligan

If I remember correctly, he was completely exonerated. I think he was working on some sort of an anti-abuse project because he had been abused as a youngster.</p>


36 posted on 07/13/2004 8:38:01 AM PDT by CarolAnn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Not for the war but intelligent enough to look into this Moore guy and see him for what he was and make an indepedent decision regarding allowing the song's use. Good for Pete, even if I'm not a Who fan.


37 posted on 07/13/2004 9:12:38 AM PDT by newzjunkey (No more Floridas: Can "W" actually win this thing outright?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHT

She's as goofy as the rodent who lives in the outside bathroom



I heard Richard Gere is a great fan of hers (rimshot).


BTW, Won't Get Fooled Again was on Who's Next, originally slated as a concept album ala Tommy and Quadraphenia. The album's theme was to be set in a post apocalyptic future, but the idea was scrapped.

I always considered Won't Get Fooled Again as an anti-60's revolution anthem. It was very cheeky with jabs against the counter-culture like "the party (or parting?) on the Left is now the party (or parting?) on the Right" and I always thought of this song as the Clintons descended past Nixonian politics into pure fascism.

I've read and witnessed Pete Townsend's life and it's like Rick James puts it, "What would YOU do if you had money, fame, women, and drugs?" It's amazing he survived, especially the 70's and 80's. But he has never been a Jane Fonda. Townsend's politics take a backseat but seem to be libertarian to conservative. Also seems Townsend is trying to reform from his past childhood abuses which led him, IMO, to his sexual confusion.


38 posted on 07/13/2004 9:17:21 AM PDT by sully777 (Our descendants will be enslaved by political expediency and expenditure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tdadams
And doesn't she always look annoyed as hell whenever John Kerry touches her?

Wouldn't you be annoyed as hell if he were to touch you?!

39 posted on 07/13/2004 4:48:17 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! -- RIP, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

And the charges were dropped.


40 posted on 07/13/2004 4:49:47 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick (Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall! -- RIP, President Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson