Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: NAACP hostile to me
Miami Herald ^ | Jul. 10, 2004 | WILLIAM DOUGLAS AND AMY WORDEN

Posted on 07/11/2004 5:52:10 PM PDT by sandlady

YORK, Pa. - President Bush said Friday that he declined an invitation to speak to the NAACP's convention in Philadelphia because of harsh statements about him by leaders of the venerable civil rights group.

''I would describe my relationship with the current leadership as basically nonexistent,'' Bush told reporters. ``You've heard the rhetoric and the names they've called me.''

Bush added that he ''admired some'' NAACP leaders and said he would seek members' support ``in other ways.''

The decision not to speak was a far cry from candidate Bush's appeal to the NAACP four years ago when he conceded at its convention in Baltimore that Republicans hadn't always gotten along with the group.

`NOT ALWAYS ALLIES'

''The NAACP and the GOP -- have not always been allies, I know that,'' Bush said then. ``But recognizing our past and confronting the common future with a common vision -- by doing that, I believe we can find common ground.''

They haven't. NAACP President Kweisi Mfume is to respond to Bush's comments today at a news conference.

It's the fourth straight year that Bush has declined an invitation to attend the NAACP convention, which opens today in Philadelphia. He's the first sitting president since Herbert Hoover not to address the group.

White House officials initially said scheduling conflicts prevented Bush from making the journey to Philadelphia or addressing the conference via satellite, as he did Thursday to the League of United Latin American Citizens convention in San Antonio, Texas.

Administration officials traveling with the president on Friday on a campaign swing through south-central Pennsylvania signaled that White House annoyance with the NAACP was the major factor.

REASON REVEALED

''The current leadership of the NAACP has certainly made some rather hostile political comments about the president over the past few years,'' White House spokesman Scott McClellan said.

NAACP Chairman Julian Bond, speaking to lawmakers and business leaders in Indiana last month, said Bush and other Republicans appeal to a racist ``dark underside of American culture.''

''They preach racial equality but practice racial division,'' Bond said.

``Their idea of equal rights is the American flag and Confederate swastika flying side-by-side.''

On Thursday, Mfume accused the Bush administration of treating the black community cynically by courting the black vote while stiffing black organizations like the NAACP.

''We're not fools,'' he said.

McClellan said the Bush administration has been courting African-American voters through its political agenda. When Bush talks about his ''No Child Left Behind'' education program, he often speaks about eliminating the ''soft bigotry of low expectations'' that minority children experience in public schools. Bush received only 9 percent of the black vote in 2000.

Worden reports for The Philadelphia Inquirer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blacks; blackvote; julianbond; liberals; mfume; naacp; naalcp; presidentbush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last
To: xm177e2
Is it valid to drop the word "venerable" in an "unbiased" news article?

Depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is.

61 posted on 07/11/2004 7:06:15 PM PDT by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: sandlady

"Does he expect special (ie unequal) treatment?"

Yes.


62 posted on 07/11/2004 7:07:09 PM PDT by Let's Roll (Kerry is a self-confessed unindicted war criminal or ... a traitor to his country in a time of war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Paulus Invictus

But the world lives on sound bites, and that sound bite is too easy to use to make him look bad.


64 posted on 07/11/2004 7:11:10 PM PDT by sharktrager (Help Laura beat Tuh-Ray-Za http://scoreboards.hotornot.com/2004electionwives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sandlady
The decision not to speak was a far cry from candidate Bush's appeal to the NAACP four years ago when he conceded at its convention in Baltimore that Republicans hadn't always gotten along with the group.

As President Bush pointed, it is the NAACP that has been hostile toward him.

65 posted on 07/11/2004 7:11:24 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

I wouldn't wring my hands too much over it if I were you. I am confident it will not play out as you predict.

The natural question one would ask is "like what?" and when they hear they would agree with the president.

President Bush has not established his new tone for nothing. Now we are going to see it pay off. People know he is not a whiner and reaches out to people. With his decision not to attend and statement of why, they will be inclined to side with him.


66 posted on 07/11/2004 7:18:10 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Trueblackman
I understand where W. is coming from, but I think this was a fairly weak way to ameliorate the situation. That is, refusing to speak is an easy but ultimately ineffective solution. I would have rather seen him go the convention, stand up in front of these people, and let them know the gosh-darn truth.

This was a perfect opportunity to sidestep the NAACP media filter.

67 posted on 07/11/2004 7:27:07 PM PDT by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sandlady
President Bush said Friday that he declined an invitation to speak to the NAACP's convention in Philadelphia because of harsh statements about him by leaders of the venerable civil rights group.

Venerable????

Becki

68 posted on 07/11/2004 7:41:00 PM PDT by Becki (Pray continually for our leaders and our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
There is no such thing as a natural question. That assumes fair treatment.

Instead, liberal commentators are going to go on about the President sounding like a crybaby because, out of context, that is exactly how it sounds.

I have seen Freepers jump all over libs for these kinds of comments.
69 posted on 07/11/2004 7:47:27 PM PDT by sharktrager (Help Laura beat Tuh-Ray-Za http://scoreboards.hotornot.com/2004electionwives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: sandlady

I liked what and how the President said. He reaches out, doesn't get angry and rant but let them know they went over the line in a very simple way. He is a man who will not be abused and disrespected. He did it exactly right.


70 posted on 07/11/2004 7:52:28 PM PDT by cajungirl (wi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

I agree! He doesn't have to use a lot of flowery words that mean nothing to make a point!


71 posted on 07/11/2004 8:05:05 PM PDT by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

We all know what liberal commentators will say. They'll make it up if they have to. I was talking about the effect.

Point to President Bush on this one.


72 posted on 07/11/2004 8:12:26 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: pickemuphere
That is, refusing to speak is an easy but ultimately ineffective solution. I would have rather seen him go the convention, stand up in front of these people, and let them know the gosh-darn truth.

They know the gosh-darn truth and don't care. They have an agenda and there's no reason President Bush needs to attend their functions and grant them more credibility than they deserve.

73 posted on 07/11/2004 8:18:27 PM PDT by cyncooper ("We will fear no evil...And we will prevail")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: sandlady

Send Dr. Rice, General Powell, Dr. Paige, etc.. to talk about self-responsibility and respect.


74 posted on 07/11/2004 8:25:13 PM PDT by tobyhill (The war on terrorism is not for the weak)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
...there's no reason President Bush needs to attend their functions and grant them more credibility than they deserve.

Render them irrelevant. As previously stated, there are other voices of African-Americans who truly want to be rid of the hostile posturing that the NAACP, Jesse Jackson, etc. perpetuate.

75 posted on 07/11/2004 8:31:11 PM PDT by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: sandlady
Good for W. No one in history has done a better job of promoting African-Americans to national leadership in government, and that's great, but W. doesn't owe the NAACP a damm thing. The following piece from the 12/14/2000 WSJ Opinion Jouinal shows why.

"We watched it on television, in that sordid ad run by the NAACP (another tax-exempt outfit) focusing on the rear bumper of a pickup with a chain attached to the hitch with the voice-over of the daughter of James Byrd saying that by not signing the hate-crimes bill Mr. Bush made her feel "like my father was killed all over again."

I hope we continue to make progress with civil rights and that African Americans come to participate fully in all the benefits of our society. But the NAACP has lost all credibility as far as I can see.

76 posted on 07/11/2004 8:35:59 PM PDT by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandlady
''We're not fools,'' he said. I think he's realizing how he's lead the NAACP into irrelevancy. Desperation is not pretty.

The NAACP should ask Muammar Ghaddafi for advice.

77 posted on 07/11/2004 8:36:20 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
It would have been interesting if Condi Rice would have spoken to the NAACP on behalf of President Bush.

We would have seen what the NAACP's true colors were!
78 posted on 07/11/2004 8:46:26 PM PDT by not2worry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: not2worry

Now that's an idea!


79 posted on 07/11/2004 8:50:28 PM PDT by sandlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: not2worry

Ooooooooh wow what a thought


80 posted on 07/11/2004 8:51:59 PM PDT by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson