Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia: Great White shark kills surfer (first fatal attack in four years)
New.Com.AU ^ | July 11, 2004 | staff writer

Posted on 07/11/2004 2:45:37 AM PDT by yankeedame

Great White shark kills surfer

By staff writers and wires
July 11, 2004

AUTHORITIES may be hunting a Great White shark which killed a 29-year-old surfer at a West Australian surfing beach, the first fatal attack in four years.


Fatal ... the victim's surfboard after the attack. (Pic: Channel 7)

The victim, Bradley Adrian Smith, was surfing with a friend and three other people at Left Handers beach, south of Gracetown, near Margaret River, yesterday when he was knocked off his board and mauled by the shark.

Two teenagers who pulled Mr Smith of Shoalwater, 41km south of Perth from the water said the shark was "as big as a car".

Now a shark expert says it sounds like authorities are hunting a Great White. Aquarium of Western Australia marine biologist Sasha Thompson said witness reports suggested that may be the case.

"It does sound like a Great White because of the size of the shark and the area it is in, coupled with the power it was reported to have in its jaws," Ms Thompson said.

She said it was impossible to say what triggered the attack.

"It is not really breeding season but it is whale migration season and that might have something to do with it depending on what type of shark it is," Ms Thompson said.

Ms Thompson, who has studied sharks for several years and undertaken shark tagging research expeditions, said sharks were more likely to attack males than females.

While it remained unclear what species of shark killed the surfer, she said Great Whites were known to spend time on WA's southern coast in winter before moving further north to meet whales returning to southern waters.

Mr Smith died at the scene from extensive injuries and blood loss following the attack at Left Handers beach yesterday, police spokesman Peter Reeves said.

A post-mortem examination would be carried out on Tuesday to determine the exact cause of death.

Witnesses to yesterday's attack have told Sky News a man swam to shore and called 000 saying his mate had been attacked by a shark.

The dead man's name was expected to be released later today, and the victim's 36-year-old brother was due to speak to the media at Margaret River, police said.

Authorities closed the beach after the attack and erected shark warning signs.

The shark apparently took less than a minute to fatally maul the surfer.

The attack - possibly by two sharks - was witnessed by several locals, many of them teenagers.

One fought with his emotions as he recounted the ordeal to reporters at Margaret River today.

"It just looked like a normal shark that you see thrashing around but they are normally reef sharks but these (two sharks) were just heaps bigger, then we saw blood coming up," he told ABC radio.

The witnesses said the surfer had no chance of surviving because of the ferocity of the attack, which they said lasted only about 45 seconds.

They saw the victim try to push the shark away but it was too big and strong, they told radio 6PR.

After the witnesses realised what had happened to the man, they dragged his body back to the shore hoping they would be able to save him.

But they said the man had died before he reached the shore after suffering massive bleeding and horrific injuries.

The attack at Left Handers beach – considered a relatively safe beach for junior surfers – is the second in WA in almost four years.

On November 6, 2000, just north of Perth's popular Cottesloe Beach, 49-year-old swimmer Ken Crew, on his regular morning swim, died after he lost his leg in a shark attack.

Fisheries officials were given permission to kill the shark, believed to have been a white pointer up to four metres in length, but they never found it.

In response to the 2000 attack, the WA government introduced daily summer aerial shark patrols.

Several other shark attacks have occurred along WA's coastline since then, but the fatality yesterday was the first since Mr Crew died.

Police and fisheries officers today boarded a search vessel to hunt for the shark which took the 29-year-old.

Fisheries officer Tony Cappelluti said if the shark was located, officers were authorised to kill it.

"If they're going to become a danger to the public, or if we believe they already have been responsible for a fatal or serious attack, then I think the community would expect us to try to alleviate that risk," he told ABC radio.

Local surfer Bart Mulder said yesterday's attack was distressing but it would not stop him surfing.

"We were going to go down to the beach for a surf and a couple of blokes came up and said 'Don't go down there – somebody's been bitten in half by a shark'," he told the ABC.

"It's the first shark fatality down in the south-west here. It's hard to say how I feel about it, but it won't stop me surfing."

AAP


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: daaaaaaahdum; daaaaaahdum; dahdumdahdumdahdum

1 posted on 07/11/2004 2:45:37 AM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

does this story blame global warming, climate change or GW Bush?


2 posted on 07/11/2004 2:47:22 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
She said it was impossible to say what triggered the attack.

Funny, I always thought they might simply get hungry and since nothing is ever really bigger than they are, they do whatever they want.

3 posted on 07/11/2004 2:53:27 AM PDT by Cvengr (;^) It might be obvious, but perhaps more obvious than the clueless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Should there really be daily aerial shark checks for something so rare??


4 posted on 07/11/2004 2:54:34 AM PDT by GeronL (wketchup.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

"A post-mortem examination would be carried out on Tuesday to determine the exact cause of death."

Um, I think the poor fellow got bit in half by a shark. For this you need CSI?


5 posted on 07/11/2004 2:57:03 AM PDT by jocon307 (Nor forgive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307; KangarooJacqui
You can never be too sure of these things.

After all, what if it was someone impersonating a shark, ala Saturday Night Live?

6 posted on 07/11/2004 3:01:13 AM PDT by The Scourge of Yazid (Where you are, well, there you is! That's all there is to it. Isn't there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
"A post-mortem examination would be carried out on Tuesday to determine the exact cause of death."

Um, I think the poor fellow got bit in half by a shark. For this you need CSI?
=============================

Well, you see this way it will be offical. You know, written down in ink and every thing.

7 posted on 07/11/2004 3:02:23 AM PDT by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter & a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cvengr

Usually it is a case of mistaken identity.

From below a surfer looks very much like a seal or sea-lion. And they are much more tasty for a Great White than us skinny humans.


8 posted on 07/11/2004 3:03:03 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy (Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

What a horrific loss for the family. How do you come to terms with the loss of a child who is taken from you in this manner?

Just curious...they say in the article that they will be out hunting for the shark that killed him.
The last time I checked, there were lots of sharks in the ocean and lots of Great Whites around Australia. How do they go about identifying the specific one that killed him?


9 posted on 07/11/2004 3:03:39 AM PDT by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Bruce strikes again!


10 posted on 07/11/2004 3:14:04 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
does this story blame global warming, climate change or GW Bush?

Oh, pay attention. It happened in the waters off Australia. Which means, therefore, (according to Australian news media), that it's John Howard's fault.

/sarcasm
11 posted on 07/11/2004 4:20:43 AM PDT by KangarooJacqui (Advice to Kerry/Edwards: "Stop that, it's silly.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Just tragic. I can't imagine that people go out of their way to protect these "eating machines".
12 posted on 07/11/2004 4:46:46 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame; Admin Moderator

I do not understand why this story -- front page news in Australian papers, as it should be -- is relegated to "chat".


13 posted on 07/11/2004 8:04:20 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

My bad. Fixed.


14 posted on 07/11/2004 8:06:17 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thanks!


15 posted on 07/11/2004 8:35:24 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Sure ;)


16 posted on 07/11/2004 8:40:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
...Most definitly! The IFGovt's started this rescuing of individuals from themselves, why stop now? These sharks are terrorists, and we should stay out of the water to appease them...

...And another thing!!! Uppp, never mind...

17 posted on 07/11/2004 9:11:13 AM PDT by gargoyle (...Let them talk, I'll loan them a soapbox, and a shovel to dig their own grave...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Close the beach.


18 posted on 07/11/2004 9:24:44 AM PDT by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Followup thread:

Aussie surfers testing boards fitted with electronic shark repellents

19 posted on 07/15/2004 10:12:06 AM PDT by martin_fierro (P a t r v v s M a x i m v s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson