Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daschle concerned about 'sobering' terror briefing
ZWire ^ | July 9, 2004 | DONNA SMITH

Posted on 07/09/2004 9:12:26 PM PDT by FairOpinion

SPEARFISH -- Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said Thursday that he was very concerned about homeland security issues in the face of what he called the most sobering terror report he had heard recently.

The United States is tightening security in the face of a steady stream of intelligence indicating an attack aimed at disrupting elections, the White House said Thursday.

The Department of Homeland Security is addressing the threat and has efforts underway to ''ramp up security,'' White House press secretary Scott McClellan said Thursday.

"It is absolutely essential for the U.S. Senate to turn its attention to what we can do to make America safe," Daschle said.

Of particular concern are the nation's borders and ports, Daschle said, and there are security issues unresolved as the homeland security appropriations are "hung up" in the Senate.

Asked if the timing of the terror concerns might be aimed at stealing political thunder from the announcement of John Edwards as the democratic vice presidential candidate, Daschle replied, "The report is so sobering and so serious that I cannot bring myself to believe anyone in this administration would use this for political purposes."

Daschle said the most recent terror briefing was the second this week and contained information that there is a higher threat than there has been at any time since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004electionattacks; 2004securitybriefing; brownshirts; daschle; dhs; domesticterrorism; fifthcolumn; fifthcolumnists; immigration; islamofascists; islamonazis; jihadinamerica; kerrydidnthavetime; nationalsecurity; securitybriefing; terrorbriefing; terrorism; terrorists; tomdaschle; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last
Daschle replied, "The report is so sobering and so serious that I cannot bring myself to believe anyone in this administration would use this for political purposes."

Now you know how serious the threat has to be for Daschle to say this.

Also, this is the briefing that Kerry "just didn't have to time" to listen to. He wants to be president, and can't find time to at least learn about the most serious threats our nation is facing.

1 posted on 07/09/2004 9:12:27 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

MUCH AGREE ON ALL YOUR POINTS.


2 posted on 07/09/2004 9:15:50 PM PDT by Quix (PRAYER WARRIORS, DO YOUR STUFF! LIVES AND NATIONS DEPEND ON IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
The Democrats (Schumer, Hillary yesterday, Daschle today) are setting this up in a gamble there'll be an attack between now and the election. They're all actually attacking the president from the right. The report must have been really scary and you can tell they're hoping in their hearts for an attack.

Shameless. Treasonous. Typical.

3 posted on 07/09/2004 9:20:18 PM PDT by Deb (Hey, Sen. Kerry...why the long face?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

This doesn't sound good.


4 posted on 07/09/2004 9:20:53 PM PDT by gilliam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: FairOpinion

So, Tom, will you be in Boston later this month? Someone needs to brief Kerry, and he's soooooo busy right now.


6 posted on 07/09/2004 9:21:03 PM PDT by auboy (The U.S. Senate… perfect experience for joining a country club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I think the American people have gotten too complacent and cynical about the terror warnings, because Bush and the intel agencies have been successful so far in foiling the attacks.

How soon people forget.


7 posted on 07/09/2004 9:21:08 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Quix

BTTT


8 posted on 07/09/2004 9:21:53 PM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (http://www.osurepublicans.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: auboy

The fact that Kerry isn't taking these intel briefs seriously to the point of not even bothering to take time to listen to them, should alone be enough to fully disqualify him from being president or even Senator.


9 posted on 07/09/2004 9:22:58 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Not looking good.


10 posted on 07/09/2004 9:24:21 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Let's see.... Kerry's too busy to vote in the Senate... too busy to attend committee meetings... too busy to attend briefings on the war on terror...

But he's not too busy to come to New York and play the guitar in a bash-Bush fundraising concert... not too busy to go on not one... not two... but, by my count THREE vacations (Sun Valley, Nantucket and Pittsburgh)....

Sounds like Al Quaeda is planning something really bad. Daschle's probably worried for his safety in Boston at the Democratic National Convention, if he thinks this is "so serious".
11 posted on 07/09/2004 9:24:50 PM PDT by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Now you know how serious the threat has to be for Daschle to say this.That is exactly was I thought when I read it. Now I'm trying to reconcile with myself why that is the case. I don't relish the idea of taking Daschle serious. eek.
12 posted on 07/09/2004 9:24:57 PM PDT by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Well at least it's not Kennedy who's concerned about these sobering terror breifings.


13 posted on 07/09/2004 9:25:25 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Yes! Kerry's not too busy for LKL or Whoopie (sp). He's heartless and soulless.


14 posted on 07/09/2004 9:27:33 PM PDT by auboy (The U.S. Senate… perfect experience for joining a country club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I strongly agree.

Thanks.


15 posted on 07/09/2004 9:28:37 PM PDT by Quix (PRAYER WARRIORS, DO YOUR STUFF! LIVES AND NATIONS DEPEND ON IT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
Clinton "just didn't have to time", either. Too many extracurricular activities. Kerry's side line seems to be "zoning out."
16 posted on 07/09/2004 9:31:57 PM PDT by oyez (¡Qué viva la revolución de Reagan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: auboy

"He (Kerry)'s heartless and soulless."

==

Not to mention totally irresponsible and UNFIT to be President.

Just as the SwiftBoat Vets warned us.

In their letter to Kerry:

"Your conduct is such as to raise substantive concerns as to your honesty and your ability to serve, as you currently seek, as Commander-in-Chief of the military services."

http://www.swiftvets.com/Index2.htm


17 posted on 07/09/2004 9:33:31 PM PDT by FairOpinion (If you are not voting for Bush, you are voting for the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
If the terrorists were trying to mess up our elections, which do you think would be the most likely target?

the Dem convention,
the Pub convention,
or something else?

I simply can't believe that terrorists would want Bush to be reelected...that can't be to their advantage, regardless of what some libs have said.

The Dems are far more likely to ease up on terrorism and yet cave to their demands; so messing with the Dem convention and their chances of success would not seem useful.

Terrorists would probably want to 'punish' the Pubs for, in their minds, Afghanistan, Iraq and continued support for Israel. But I'm not sure if an attack on the Pubs would have the desired effect...it could possibly bring back the post-9/11 unity and nationalism that could sweep the Pubs to a landslide.

I can't think of what other targets might be in their heads that would affect our elections in the direction they want them to go.

18 posted on 07/09/2004 9:33:53 PM PDT by Sender (Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -Tolstoy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
"not too busy to go on not one... not two... but, by my count THREE vacations"

It's probably one of those Billionaire things; like the glass looks half full because he didn't take vacations during three weeks.

19 posted on 07/09/2004 9:34:10 PM PDT by bayourod (Kerry, the human downer, knows the words to "optimism" but can't quite get the tune right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Daschle's probably worried for his safety in Boston at the Democratic National Convention, if he thinks this is "so serious".

Right you are, the weasel is foreshadowing some future rat weaseling move.

20 posted on 07/09/2004 9:35:12 PM PDT by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 261-276 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson