BUSH VS. KERRY - IS IT REALLY THAT CLOSE?

InvestorsInsight ^ | July 6, 2004 | Gary D. Halbert

[Lee'sGhost]

"The forecasters chalk up the 2000 error to Gore's campaign, which distanced itself from the Clinton record. All the models assume the candidates will run reasonably competent campaigns, said Thomas Holbrook, a professor at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee."


Most models don't assume that God will intercede, as surely as He must have in 2000 to save the U.S. from what was to come.

[Smartass]

It's a battle. When the smoke clears...Bush and Cheney will prevail!

[Valin]

I may REALLY looking forward to the debate between Cheney and Edwards! Talk about shooting fish in a barrel.

[BureaucratusMaximus]

One thing I wonder about is NY. They were the ones attacked. They had the most losses, lives and money.

...and they elected Hillary as Senator. Nuff said.

[SuziQ]

Here's some good news! This article cites the Battleground Poll I'd mentioned on the other thread.

[paul51]

Good info there. Thanks

[1Old Pro]

Every year is a "bad" year for a Republican President as far as the liberal media. However, the people see thru this filter and Bush will win and win convincingly.

[j_tull]

...and they elected Hillary as Senator. Nuff said.

Well, they and a few generations of their ancestors, along with some well-bought-off Hassidics.

[NYC Republican]

bump

[BenLurkin]

And lots of quality gin with which to thicken one's goggles.

[nunya bidness]

I'm upgrading me previous prediction to Bush in 45 to 49 states.

More good news, a Texan is set to win an unprecedented 6th Tour de France. Better start watching, it's a hoot. Any day now Shiner Bock is going to sponsor a team.