Skip to comments.
Judge Leon Holmes Confirmed
CSPAN
| 7/6/04
| Senate
Posted on 07/06/2004 3:16:28 PM PDT by pookie18
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: deport
Six 'Rat Senators supported Holmes, including two women. Intersting. I thought this nomination was doomed.
To: gaspar
if Texans were stupid enough to give us Lyndon Johnson, and give themselves Ma RichardsAnd then I came of age and crap like that isn't supposed to happen anymore. Heck, I want my governor back, you know, the one you guys captured and made into a President. I want him back in 2008. As governor. Dagnabit!
/john
42
posted on
07/06/2004 6:08:41 PM PDT
by
JRandomFreeper
(But what do I know, I'm just a cook. No disguta conmigo!)
To: Cicero
Sounds like my kinda guy.
Why, if he's a second amendment purist, he's darn near perfect!
43
posted on
07/06/2004 6:12:13 PM PDT
by
Mr. Thorne
("But iron, cold iron, shall be master of them all..." Kipling)
To: nickcarraway
44
posted on
07/06/2004 6:15:12 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: GeorgeBerryman
I know what you are saying, but what if her PRINCIPLE is "pro-choice," and this allowed her to vote as she really wanted, rather than as the party needed her to vote? As long as it doesn't affect the outcome, I don't think it really matters.
45
posted on
07/06/2004 6:16:41 PM PDT
by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of news.)
To: Cicero
You can tell a man by his enemies. Judge Leon Holmes seems to have made the right ones.
46
posted on
07/06/2004 6:18:43 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Become a monthly donor! Viking Kittens do not live by troll alone.)
To: adam_az
You mean the Metrosexual running with the Second Black President?
They are a joke.
To: JRandomFreeper
Heck, I want my governor back, you know, the one you guys captured and made into a President. I want him back in 2008. As governor. Dagnabit! You can have him back on January 20, 2008. But we expect a little something in return.
48
posted on
07/06/2004 6:22:33 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Become a monthly donor! Viking Kittens do not live by troll alone.)
To: AdSimp; Corin Stormhands; Flora McDonald; iceskater; Mudboy Slim; P8riot; sultan88
fyi (John Warner can be found amongst the nays)
49
posted on
07/06/2004 6:32:01 PM PDT
by
jla
(http://www.ronaldreaganmemorial.com/memorial_fund.asp)
To: Dont Mention the War
Not a single suprise on that list.
I was a little surprised at Specter voting for the nomination as he didn't support him out of the Committee but then he's running for reelection and chairman of the Committee... The other that surprised me a little was Landrieu as she has voted with the majority of the dems when they've opposed a nomination.....
50
posted on
07/06/2004 6:35:27 PM PDT
by
deport
(Please Flush the Johns......)
To: Harmless Teddy Bear
You can have him back on January 20, 2008.I say, give him a break. As long as he's back by Feb 1st, 2009.
All you get in return is some real conservatives for the Senate and House. We'll do our best not to send RINOs.
/john
51
posted on
07/06/2004 6:39:56 PM PDT
by
JRandomFreeper
(But what do I know, I'm just a cook. No disguta conmigo!)
To: Mudboy Slim
What's with Warner voting against Holmes? Think it is way past time for him to retire?
52
posted on
07/06/2004 7:01:37 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
To: Dont Mention the War
I am shocked that Spectre voted for Holmes and that Landrieu also voted for him. Warner -- a little surprised. The rest -- not at all!
53
posted on
07/06/2004 7:03:56 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
To: LS
She's a pro-choicer.so that means she won'y vote for any pro-lifer?
To: PhiKapMom
What's with Warner voting against Holmes?What do you expect from Elizabeth Taylor's ex-husband?
55
posted on
07/06/2004 7:07:01 PM PDT
by
lasereye
To: LS
Kay Bailey has enormously disappointed me, for what it's worth. Holmes had opposition because he was pro-life and because he was Christian, and because he had the audacity to write about his Christian beliefs. That is all. This is the clearest example of anti-Christian bias that I've ever seen.
The left might as well hang up a sign that says, "Christians Not Welcome."
To: alwaysconservative
Is Murkowski pro-abortion?
57
posted on
07/06/2004 7:08:44 PM PDT
by
lasereye
To: lasereye
58
posted on
07/06/2004 7:08:47 PM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
(AOII Mom -- Oklahoma is Reagan Country and now Bush Country -- Win Another One for the Gipper!)
To: JackTom
One must wonder if John F. Kerry and Edwards will bother to show up when FMA comes to a vote next week.
Bwahaha. One of the few real strokes of genius by Republicans.
To: jla
SHEEEESH...Warner's such a Leftist SCUMBAG!!!
When's the next Cantor fund-raiser, partner?! We need to bend some folks' ears about Warner, the outta control domestic spending growth, and a few other things. Cantor's gotta lotta explaining to do, imho...with himn as DeputyWhip, why can't conservative GOPers in the House get more spending cuts sent to the Senate?! And why isn't Dubyuh more accommodating to Tom Delay and the RightWing folks?!
FReegards...MUD
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-113 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson