"Yeah, yeah, yeah. It's so wrong they only invite Jesse Jackson and his ilk to access their lists!"
So then I gather you are a supporter of the new theocracy?
I haven't decided if I'm for granting direct access to the lists. (I have a feeling based on my experience with conservatives that most would ask church members for permission before their names were forwarded.)
What I AM against is the hypocrisy of those crying wolf about one more thing!
Get real. Kerry can go into a liberal black church and deliver a political speech and the pastor can instruct his parishoners to vote straight Democrap and they will not hear one word from the IRS.
Do you think that the liberals won't institute their own theocracy that worships perversion of all that is good and right?
There really isn't anything new about this. Haven't you seen the democrats standing in the pulpits for years doing the Baptist preacher campaigning thing, while attacking any Pubbie who would dare speak anywhere near a Church? Church goers are citizens too, and have every right to hear what the candidates who decide our future have to say!
If you can, describe what you mean by "the new theocracy"? What are the specific dangers you see? Try to be as precise and specific as possible ( actual, current government policies). I would be interested and it might inform and improve the debate.
This kind of thing has been going on for quite a while - the Christian Coalition, the Moral Majority, Pro-life groups, school prayer lobbyists, etc. The Reagan-Bush and Bush-Quayle campaigns targeted very specific cultural demographics, including religious orientation. In what sense is campaign support research using those kind of demographics a "theocracy"?
"So then I gather you are a supporter of the new theocracy?"
Theocracy, what theocracy?
"So then I gather you are a supporter of the new theocracy?"
What the hell are you talking about?
Are you a supporter of misusing words as a means of generating a scare tactic? Seems so.