Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nicole Kidman/New Line Cinema Film Features Pedophilia
TVC Weekly News ^ | June 25, 2004

Posted on 07/02/2004 2:30:01 AM PDT by Free2Be49

Nicole Kidman/New Line Cinema Film Features Pedophilia

June 25, 2004

TVC Weekly News
 http://www.traditionalvalues.org/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1700

Actress Nicole Kidman will be appearing soon in "Birth," a film where she believes a 10-year-old boy is actually her reincarnated husband.

The film features Kidman naked in the bathtub with this boy and another scene shows them kissing. Various news reports have indicated that New Line Cinema executives were outraged at the scenes and are reportedly considering pulling the $72 million movie because of these pedophilia scenes.

The movie is directed by Jonathan Glazer ("Sexy Beast") and the screen play was co-written by Milo Addica ("Monster’s Ball") and Jean-Claude Carriere, who was a co-writer on "The Unbearable Lightness of Being," a soft-core pornography film and other foreign films.

A Yahoo Movies report (June 15, 2004) indicated that New Line PR people think this will be a publicity nightmare for the film company. Let’s make it so.

The effort to normalize pedophilia will become more aggressive in the coming years as homosexuals gain more political and cultural power. The Weekly Standard reported on this trend back in 2001. Author Mary Eberstadt, writing in "’PedophiliaChic’ Reconsidered," describes the efforts of homosexuals to normalize adult/child sex.

Some psychiatrists are also pushing for the removal of pedophilia as a mental disorder from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). Read TVC’s report on this trend: "Pedophiles/Sex Torturers Seek Normalization."

TAKE ACTION: Contact New Line Cinema’s executives and tell them that you are outraged by this upcoming film and urge them to drop the project immediately. Tell them if they refuse to drop the film, you will boycott all further films produced by this company. Contact information is available here: New Line Cinema. In addition, boycott future films starring Nicole Kidman and let the film producers know of your plans.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: hollyweird; kidman; pedophilia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
This web site is a tool making communicating with Elected Officials, Issues & Legislation, Elections & Candidates, and a Media Guide very easy.  The link is  http://capwiz.com/traditional/home/ .  For help in communicating with the media, go directly to http://capwiz.com/traditional/dbq/media/ .

Bear in mind, when the normalization of the homosexual agenda that has been been promoted continuously for the past five years began, critics complained this was a gateway for that lobby's future planks primarily the reduction of the age of consent for the targets of pedophiles, a subgroup of the homosexual lobby.  We were assured this alarm was homophobic paranoia.  This film, therefore, should not be in line for release to the general cinematic audience, but it is.

1 posted on 07/02/2004 2:30:01 AM PDT by Free2Be49
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

Pedophilia Chic. I mean its a woman and a 10 year old boy. He's being shown sowing his oats? What are liberals so outraged about - these are the folks mind you, who think teen sex in summer camp is a civil right. Go figure. So what's the fuss over Nicole Kidman from people who believe we shoudn't judge sexuality? Give me a break.


2 posted on 07/02/2004 2:33:31 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

Hollywood execs are outraged yet the worlds most blatant pedophile Michael Jackson for years was/is celebrated, given awards, and honored.


3 posted on 07/02/2004 3:06:38 AM PDT by stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hitlery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49
To top this, Nicole is going to have to make a movie showing her having sex with dead children.
4 posted on 07/02/2004 3:31:21 AM PDT by Nachoman (A government that no longer respects its citizens, must then be compelled to fear them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

Just when you think Hollywood couldn't go lower.....


5 posted on 07/02/2004 3:59:26 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

So Kidman plays a Florida reading teacher in the movie?


6 posted on 07/02/2004 4:00:59 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

She had a similar role in "To Die For".


7 posted on 07/02/2004 4:19:33 AM PDT by SirLurkedalot ("Man I'm tired of being right!" Ace Ventura)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stillnoprotestsagainstmuslims
Hollywood execs are outraged yet the worlds most blatant pedophile Michael Jackson for years was/is celebrated, given awards, and honored.

Yes, and Reagan honored Jackson too...long before he was exposed for his problems (i.e. when he was still black)

Michael Jackson isn't "hollywood" either. He's MTV and motown.

However, you are correct about Hollywood ...Roman Polanski, a child rapist, got an academy award for "the Pianist"...and they ignored or tried to his rape of a 13 year old...the BBC published the court testimony however and it was horrific. The American press ignored it...saying she had "forgiven" him...as if this made it ok.

8 posted on 07/02/2004 4:20:45 AM PDT by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
10 is very young, way to young to be "sowing oaths". The execs are right, the film should be pulled.

I like Kidman, but she does do some stupid things from time to time.

9 posted on 07/02/2004 4:31:53 AM PDT by jpsb (Nominated 1994 "Worst writer on the net")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

What does the above example have to do with a homosexual agenda? A quick reading comprehension excercise....
Nicole Kidman is a female, the Boy is a male....therefore it isn't homosexual, but heterosexual pedophilia that they are attempting to "normalize".


10 posted on 07/02/2004 4:36:13 AM PDT by BritExPatInFla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BritExPatInFla

well, first heterosexual pedophilia and then homosexual pedophilia is next. Then child rape will be taken as the next issue that we are all judgemental about. It is a slippery slope isn't it?


11 posted on 07/02/2004 4:58:33 AM PDT by cajungirl (<i>swing low, sweet limousine, comin' fer to Kerry me hoooommmee</i>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

I'm afraid so. We've been brainwashed into not judging about sex lest we appear prudish or moral busybodies.


12 posted on 07/02/2004 5:00:50 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

At the least, making adult females having sex with pre-teen
males socially acceptable.
These kind of people have a hugely powerful propaganda apparatus to promote their agenda; subtly but relentlessly.


13 posted on 07/02/2004 5:23:49 AM PDT by wolficatZ (><)))*>____\0/___/!__"ABBOTT!!!!"__)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wolficatZ

One child at a time. Its called de-sentitization.


14 posted on 07/02/2004 5:26:38 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun

Did you hear about the Meg Ryan movie from a few months ago, where she does a full nude scene..Can't recall the name, but it went from the screen to video stores in about 15 minutes..her career is soooo over..


15 posted on 07/02/2004 6:51:45 AM PDT by ken5050 (We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

Have you noticed that Meg is no longer wearing Meg's face.


16 posted on 07/02/2004 6:54:33 AM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss

No..what do you mean?..she had a porcedure..a botox?..got pics?


17 posted on 07/02/2004 7:01:58 AM PDT by ken5050 (We've looked for WMD in Iraq for LESS time than Hillary looked for the Rose Law firm billing records)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49
Hmmm. I understand the angst here and it does leave a bad taste in your mouth.

Is the discomfort caused by observing the intimacy on the screen, or just the idea of it at all? Should we pull Lolita from bookshelves? Is it because a 10-year-old had to actually kiss Nicole, and the pedophilia in Lolita is just in our minds after we read it? If its the former, then if the child kissing Nicole were digitally created, would the movie be more on par with Lolita since no actual children were used to create the scene?
18 posted on 07/02/2004 7:02:45 AM PDT by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
Have you noticed that Meg is no longer wearing Meg's face.

Unfortunately, yes. Her face was her best part.

19 posted on 07/02/2004 7:03:57 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Free2Be49

Summer of 42 with Jennifer O'Neill is about a woman who sexually molests a young teen age boy after her husband dies in the war...

Then we have a professor who lusts after Lolita, a pubescent teen who turns the tables on Winston.

Then there is Darth Vader who has Luke in his sights and says, 'The boy is mine.' Lucas could have written any number of clever catch phrases for that moment. But 'the boy is mine' is what he chose.

What are we to make of the myriad of references in literature and film about "adults" and the "children" they hunt? This film depicts a ten year old which seems to me to be absolutely criminally sick. But at what age should the lines be drawn?


20 posted on 07/15/2004 9:29:28 AM PDT by eleni121 (Mt. Rushmore welcomes the Gipper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson