Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

20 to 40 Tactical Nukes Already in The US?
www.WSBA910.com morning drive interview ^ | 6/30/04 | Me: 7.62 x 51mm

Posted on 06/30/2004 4:57:05 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm

On the way into work at 6:20am, I was listening to local radio station, WBSA's (www.wsba910.com) Dennis Edwards, interview of Paul L. Williams, author of his new book, "Osama's Revenge: The Next 9-11", who said there are already 20-40 tactical (10 kiloton) nukes in the US, in major cities. He also said that in October 2001, George Tenet testified that he'd sent President Bush a memo detailing some of the information and the serial numbers of two (2) of the nukes.

Anyone else hear this? Really ruined my day, if true.

I'm in the York-Lancaster, PA area, and have seen numerous men in blue military field uniforms with NEST on the backs of their suits, over the past 4-5 weeks.

We have Three Mile Island (north) and Peach Bottom (southeast) nuclear reactors within 20 miles of my home and business, but otherwise this area is not a "target-rich" environment.

I did a Google search for that acronym and didn't find anything relating to Nuclear Emergency Search Team or anything close to it, after 8 pages. FR has a few articles in their search archives.

It's 7:53am as I write this. and the next interview with author Williams will be on at 8:10am. You can get it streamed over the Net. They also carry Rush and Hannity daily. Sorry I didn't get this on sooner, but I have 4 landscape crews to brief and get moving, plus the retail garden center staff to get started-up and moving by 7am.

If this book is even partially accurate, we have a major headache brewing.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 90dayhalflife; blackhelicopters; chickenlittle; fraud; kooks; maintenance; osamasrevenge; retread; talkradiohype; ufo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-226 next last
To: familyofman

I've got plenty of tinfoil sitting right here, just in case.


141 posted on 06/30/2004 7:29:58 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

It'd be child's play to get nukes up through Arizona.


142 posted on 06/30/2004 7:30:10 AM PDT by Mamzelle (for a post-neo conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 11th Earl of Mar
Or a Suitcase Nookie.

You mean like that scene in Stripes?

143 posted on 06/30/2004 7:36:41 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The first time I heard this theory, more than a decade ago, the nukes had supposedly been smuggled into the US by the Soviet Union and buried outside major cities, to be dug up, armed and detonated by Soviet agents when they were ordered to do so.

Whatever for? By the time there was even the glimmering of a possiblity of stopping missile-delivered nukes, the USSR was out of business.

144 posted on 06/30/2004 7:39:13 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
[Feel safer now?]

After visiting Port Charleston, SC, back in January to pick up a glider we were importing from Germany and seeing absolutely no apparent increased security, i.e., no harbor patrol, no Coast Guard, no video surveilence, only one (brain dead) security guard at the guard shack, so, no I don't feel safer. A week later President Bush gave a speech from the exact spot where I waited for our illustrious Customs Agents to process my paperwork and there were 3 Coast Guard ships in the harbor, several harbor partrol boats, security cameras and cops everywhere, Secret Service, etc. It became very apparent that we are wide open and all the hooha about "homeland security" is smoke and mirrors for the most part.

I do wireless telecommunications system testing. I've worked on the Mexican border in several places in CA, AZ, NM and TX and have seen with my own eyes illegals going back and forth with no one questioning them, including border guards who were more interested as to why we had a guy on a tower than the illegals streaming across.

The barge thing came up when I was talking to a guy who runs a tugboat business pushing barges up and down the Tennessee and Ohio Rivers. He seemed to think that it would be easy to bring anything you wanted to any place you wanted on the river system since nobody is checking. A "device" could be stored on a moored barge for months until they were ready to use it.

I doubt we'll see another successful attack in New York City or Washington, DC, due to the security measures in place, but other, smaller cities in the "heartland" such as St. Louis, Cincinatti, Louisville, Chattanooga, Memphis, Quad Cities, and Kansas City, among others, would seem to be softer targets vunerable to attack from the rivers they sit on.

Something tells me this is going to get a whole lot worse before it's over.

145 posted on 06/30/2004 7:42:34 AM PDT by Thermalseeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Only fancy nukes, like neutron bombs, need fancy maintenence. A uranium or plutonium fission bomb has a looong shelf-life.

Even a simple fission bomb has issues with radiation degrading various elements (most notably the electronics, but also the precision charges of chemical explosive).

The issues with "suitcase nukes" are considerably more intransigent -- you just can't make something that small go critical without various high-maintenance complications (e.g. tritium "spiking").

146 posted on 06/30/2004 7:44:24 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm

I was under the impression that these devices need a type of upkeep that terrorists can't provide. It's not beyond the realm of possibility, but it's unlikely.

I think our entrance into Afghanistan and/or Iraq would have triggered a nuclear response if they had the ability to deliver it.

I think if we ever suffer such an attack it will be from several nations at the same time. Our response would be lame, fractured, or non-existant.


147 posted on 06/30/2004 7:45:02 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker

Anything is possible. We have no way of knowing what is being planned, or for when.

I find it heartening that people are aware enough to be discussing it openly on FR. Knowledge is always useful, even if we don't know when we're going to need it.


148 posted on 06/30/2004 7:47:06 AM PDT by Judith Anne (Just another Bush-bot biddy drinking that Republican KoolAid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: eno_
It is the tritium in certain designs that has a short shelf-life.

Even worse, tritium turns into helium-3, a substance that diffuses through pretty much any barrier and scarfs up neutrons like Michael Moore scarfs up greaseburgers. Fissionable material permeated with helium-3 makes a nice paperweight.

149 posted on 06/30/2004 7:50:53 AM PDT by steve-b (Panties & Leashes Would Look Good On Spammers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: fella
As long as we have our boomers at sea the islam-a-nazis had better not pull that trigger.

Speaking of which . . . how long before some of our ships start coming back into port?

150 posted on 06/30/2004 7:53:01 AM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: 7.62 x 51mm
Any average "Mexican Coyote" could smuggle one across our southern border as easily as he could illegal immigrants, marijuana, cocaine or heroin!

No Doubt About It!

151 posted on 06/30/2004 7:58:42 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duk

Thats an eveb bigger bunch of horse crap. What happens if we happen to find a nuke in the US that is state sponsored? Guess what happens to the sponsoring nation?


152 posted on 06/30/2004 8:01:39 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The latest NewsWeek magazine revealed some interesting El Qaida insiders information. It shows that Bin Laden was over ruled when he wanted to order the attack on America one year before 9/11. Other senior officials in the El Qaida feared a war with the US, and losing the support from Pakistan. In other words there has been some sort of moderation discussion in the mist of this rabid fanatic organization. This rabid organization has good links with the government of Saudi Arabia, and Iran, which are governed by not totally crazy people. These governments could have purchased the nukes and placed them in their embassies in the US. You know the international rule not to search diplomatic pouches!

We all know that mini nukes are in the hands of countries that are friends of the US. These countries can be seeking to put us on notice that we are not going to get away with absolute disregard to their interests. Smuggling such devices to the US is not a bog deal, as we have seen on TV. Therefore, the potential of such devices being hidden in unfriendly embassies is very possible. Having said so, I doubt that any of these countries would risk a nuclear war against the US. These devices are here essentially as an insurance policy? The secret service people have lots insider information, and if they estimated that such possibility is here, I believe them. However, I am very surprised at the number 20-40? I would have imagined one or two at the most! But they get the big bucks for being the experts?

153 posted on 06/30/2004 8:07:47 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The latest NewsWeek magazine revealed some interesting El Qaida insiders information. It shows that Bin Laden was over ruled when he wanted to order the attack on America one year before 9/11. Other senior officials in the El Qaida feared a war with the US, and losing the support from Pakistan. In other words there has been some sort of moderation discussion in the mist of this rabid fanatic organization. This rabid organization has good links with the government of Saudi Arabia, and Iran, which are governed by not totally crazy people. These governments could have purchased the nukes and placed them in their embassies in the US. You know the international rule not to search diplomatic pouches!

We all know that mini nukes are in the hands of countries that are friends of the US. These countries can be seeking to put us on notice that we are not going to get away with absolute disregard to their interests. Smuggling such devices to the US is not a bog deal, as we have seen on TV. Therefore, the potential of such devices being hidden in unfriendly embassies is very possible. Having said so, I doubt that any of these countries would risk a nuclear war against the US. These devices are here essentially as an insurance policy? The secret service people have lots insider information, and if they estimated that such possibility is here, I believe them. However, I am very surprised at the number 20-40? I would have imagined one or two at the most! But they get the big bucks for being the experts?

154 posted on 06/30/2004 8:07:54 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The latest NewsWeek magazine revealed some interesting El Qaida insiders information. It shows that Bin Laden was over ruled when he wanted to order the attack on America one year before 9/11. Other senior officials in the El Qaida feared a war with the US, and losing the support from Pakistan. In other words there has been some sort of moderation discussion in the mist of this rabid fanatic organization. This rabid organization has good links with the government of Saudi Arabia, and Iran, which are governed by not totally crazy people. These governments could have purchased the nukes and placed them in their embassies in the US. You know the international rule not to search diplomatic pouches!

We all know that mini nukes are in the hands of countries that are friends of the US. These countries can be seeking to put us on notice that we are not going to get away with absolute disregard to their interests. Smuggling such devices to the US is not a bog deal, as we have seen on TV. Therefore, the potential of such devices being hidden in unfriendly embassies is very possible. Having said so, I doubt that any of these countries would risk a nuclear war against the US. These devices are here essentially as an insurance policy? The secret service people have lots insider information, and if they estimated that such possibility is here, I believe them. However, I am very surprised at the number 30-40? I would have imagined one or two at the most! But they get the big bucks for being the experts?

155 posted on 06/30/2004 8:08:27 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightthinkinAmerican

I stocked up on Reynolds Wrap, duct tape and plastic sheeting on my last visit to Walmart.

I'm ready!!!!


156 posted on 06/30/2004 8:09:22 AM PDT by TomGuy (Clintonites have such good hind-sight because they had their heads up their hind-ends 8 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: rintense; Brilliant

I still think Col Ka-Daffy(duck) knows we're going to get hit hard and by whom, and he's decided to make nice to get off of our 'short list' for retaliation, for when it does happen. I've been suspicious of his sudden attitude turnaround since day one. JMHO.

Yeah, I know: lousy sentence. But I'm juggling projects, customers, calls, and retail traffic, not to mention an accident/injury with one of the landscape teams.


157 posted on 06/30/2004 8:10:22 AM PDT by 7.62 x 51mm (• Veni • Vidi • Vino •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123

But why would they plant nukes and then just wait? It makes no sense. If they had them in place, they'd detonate them.


158 posted on 06/30/2004 8:25:41 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I am thinking they are probably playing chiken game like we used to do with USSR?


159 posted on 06/30/2004 8:28:26 AM PDT by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123

Why blackmail us? Why not just support John F'n Kerry for President. He'll have the troops home before Christmas...


160 posted on 06/30/2004 8:35:16 AM PDT by bondjamesbond (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221-226 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson