Posted on 06/29/2004 8:31:10 AM PDT by KMC1
NEW YORK - Tomorrow night Dan Proft, President of Leader Media, and former advisor to former Senate Candidate Jack Ryan will appear on O'Reilly factor to discuss the push from the media to delve into sealed divorce records. Proft is among those now suing for access to John Kerry's sealed records. ABC News and Fox are both pursuing the developing story - that appears now to be destined to open the private files of the Democratic candidate for President.
(Excerpt) Read more at kmclive.com ...
Ouch. Payback is a b!tch.
Although, I think they should have let the media do it without prodding from any political figures.
This is really none of my business and I see no reason for the state to be opening records of private citizens against their wishes. Even idiot private citizens.
Despite the vile methods employed by the left, and the pragmatism of being just like them; this is wrong.
Personally, I don't like this. But I heard Napolitano saying on Fox that opening Ryan's records was the right decision, and he is quite conservative.
He said that anytime you file anything in court, you should expect it to be part of the public record, even sealed divorce cases. I find this strange, but I don't agree with lots of things judges decide.
What is the media thinking? Don't they know this kind of invasive probing is only relevant when dealing with Alabama National Guard dental records?
Sealed records...I guess not. Kerry is an ass, but I don't think it takes unsealing private divorce records to see that.
I see a storm brewing in the path of the S. S. Kerry.
Mrs. Ryan
A judge in Boston? You have to be kidding..
Think about it: The one good thing about Massachusetts' recognition of "gay marriage" is that we may one day have the pleasure of suing to have Barney Franks' divorce records unsealed.
If Ryan's records were their business, this is our business. Fire with fire. Dirty bastards ruin Ryan and now they want to get sanctimonious.
Remember this is the People's Republic of Massachusetts, the feudal lands and serfs of the Kennedys. The courts there are ,shall we say, politically oriented. Kerry's records will never be opened up before the election. Now if it were a Republican candidate, the records would be "outed" to the media before the first phone call from a reporter was finished.
The bigger question is why were the record sealed in the first place? Except for matters dealing with child custody, in most states divorce records are open to the public unless sealed by the court for compelling reasons.
Napolitano is not conservative.
That's what they want you to think, nopw that they've ruined our guy by the same means, they can talk about how wrong it is. Their mission is already accomplished.
Posted on 06/28/2004 12:01:02 AM PDT by lizmac
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX SUN JUNE 27, 2004 20:34:08 ET XXXXXCHASE ON FOR SEALED KERRY DIVORCE DOCUMENTS; PAPER FRENZY AFTER ILLINOIS SENATE RACE RELEASE
After last week's front page headlines over ugly unsealed divorce records in the Republican Illinois senate race, media outlets now face a dilemma: What to do about Democrat presidential hopeful John Kerry's sealed divorce records!
The race is on in political and media circles to gauge the import of Kerry's sealed July 25, 1988 divorce from his first wife, Julia Stimson Thorne.
Hillary needs them for the election.
I'd rather they forced Tay Raise Ahhh to release her tax returns in full...but this will do....(grin)
Lets see how much Senator Gigilo made off of that....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.