Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/29/2004 8:31:17 AM PDT by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: KMC1

Ouch. Payback is a b!tch.

Although, I think they should have let the media do it without prodding from any political figures.


2 posted on 06/29/2004 8:33:39 AM PDT by nuffsenuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

This is really none of my business and I see no reason for the state to be opening records of private citizens against their wishes. Even idiot private citizens.


3 posted on 06/29/2004 8:34:01 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Despite the vile methods employed by the left, and the pragmatism of being just like them; this is wrong.


4 posted on 06/29/2004 8:34:27 AM PDT by laotzu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Personally, I don't like this. But I heard Napolitano saying on Fox that opening Ryan's records was the right decision, and he is quite conservative.

He said that anytime you file anything in court, you should expect it to be part of the public record, even sealed divorce cases. I find this strange, but I don't agree with lots of things judges decide.


5 posted on 06/29/2004 8:34:27 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

What is the media thinking? Don't they know this kind of invasive probing is only relevant when dealing with Alabama National Guard dental records?


6 posted on 06/29/2004 8:34:51 AM PDT by VisualizeSmallerGovernment (Question Liberal Authority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Sealed records...I guess not. Kerry is an ass, but I don't think it takes unsealing private divorce records to see that.


7 posted on 06/29/2004 8:35:21 AM PDT by Pondman88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

I see a storm brewing in the path of the S. S. Kerry.


8 posted on 06/29/2004 8:36:15 AM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Mrs. Ryan

9 posted on 06/29/2004 8:36:39 AM PDT by NativeNewYorker (Don't blame me. I voted for Sharpton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1
Recent precedence has been set. Ha!
10 posted on 06/29/2004 8:36:40 AM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

A judge in Boston? You have to be kidding..


11 posted on 06/29/2004 8:37:22 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Remember this is the People's Republic of Massachusetts, the feudal lands and serfs of the Kennedys. The courts there are ,shall we say, politically oriented. Kerry's records will never be opened up before the election. Now if it were a Republican candidate, the records would be "outed" to the media before the first phone call from a reporter was finished.


14 posted on 06/29/2004 8:38:37 AM PDT by JeeperFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Hillary needs them for the election.


19 posted on 06/29/2004 8:39:55 AM PDT by bmwcyle (<a href="http://www.johnkerry.com/" target="_blank">miserable failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

I'd rather they forced Tay Raise Ahhh to release her tax returns in full...but this will do....(grin)

Lets see how much Senator Gigilo made off of that....


20 posted on 06/29/2004 8:40:29 AM PDT by Badeye ("The day you stop learning, is the day you begin dying")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Its about time.

I find it wrong to open sealed records, but if it was done to one candidate, than it must be done to another. Why is it of public concern for a congressional candidate, yet not for a presidental candidate?

It is stooping to the dims level, but sometimes you must.


21 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:08 AM PDT by backinthefold (9/11 changed me, and I will never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1
Divorce proceedings are public record. That's why permission from the judge is needed to have them sealed. Politics, hidden under the guise of the media's plea of "public has a right to know", stinks. But none on the RAT side squawked when it was happening to Jack Ryan.

Like the Office of Independent Council law, the RATS never squawked about it, until it was used against x42i.
26 posted on 06/29/2004 8:42:54 AM PDT by stylin19a (parking on the curb is not off-roading)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Go baby go!

What's good for the goose...


30 posted on 06/29/2004 8:44:44 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound to the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Just another thing Republicans will be beat up over -- just watch! I can hear the talking points now.


35 posted on 06/29/2004 8:45:31 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Theres no guarentee that they will even find anything of substance. I think there is more traction to be gained if the request is denied. If it is made public that Ryans files were opened and JF'nK's were denied, it will make people distrust the liberal judges/media even more - and hopefully add to the distain of Ketchup boy.


36 posted on 06/29/2004 8:47:27 AM PDT by thepatriot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Unfortunately, his medical records, military records and Theresa's tax records are private and cannot be released without their consent, but the media should be asking for them.

This is a start, at any rate, but I hope they're not bad enough to force him off the ticket, just damage him, because W appears to be in trouble if there is a Dem. candidate with any charisma.


44 posted on 06/29/2004 8:56:20 AM PDT by mak5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KMC1

Aren't all sorts of records in civil litigation sealed from time to time?

Liability cases (product, medical, etc.) that settle after the trial has started but before they get to a jury often contain agreements that the parties will seal the terms and not discuss them further.


47 posted on 06/29/2004 9:00:08 AM PDT by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson