Skip to comments.
Lack of Hormone Gave 'Superkid' Big Muscles
Reuters ^
| Thu, Jun 24, 2004
Posted on 06/24/2004 8:13:42 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
1
posted on
06/24/2004 8:13:44 AM PDT
by
presidio9
To: presidio9
I bet he has big feet, too...
2
posted on
06/24/2004 8:16:24 AM PDT
by
traumer
To: presidio9
haven't scientists done experimentation on mice on this topic? I seem to recall something along these lines, recently.
3
posted on
06/24/2004 8:16:51 AM PDT
by
King Prout
(the difference between "trained intellect" and "indoctrinated intellectual" is an Abyssal gulf)
To: presidio9
I think Myostatin hormone therapy will be the new vanity craze -- the new cosmetic surgery -- of the next decade, if not before.
Look like Schwarzenegger without working out. I think there might possibly be a market for that, over and above the market for a muscular dystrophy treatment.
4
posted on
06/24/2004 8:17:12 AM PDT
by
Maceman
(Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
To: King Prout
Check out the latest Scientific American and numerous other articles on "gene doping".
The "supplent" industry is already selling myostatin blockers (they claim).
5
posted on
06/24/2004 8:21:24 AM PDT
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: presidio9
Why would Rueters write about this without providing pix? Anyone out there have a pic of this kid?
6
posted on
06/24/2004 8:23:09 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
To: presidio9
ARnold Schwarzenegger's kid?
7
posted on
06/24/2004 8:23:13 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(W2K4!)
To: presidio9
Reuters reportage has finally achieved supermarket checkout line credibility they've obviously been seeking.
8
posted on
06/24/2004 8:23:52 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: presidio9
"Natural", my extremely developed gluteus maximus. Call me tinfoil, but I think this kid was genetically engineered.
9
posted on
06/24/2004 8:24:19 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Islam delenda est)
To: presidio9
Someday they will figure out what happened to make Angus MacAskill into the giant he was, and then the world will never be the same.
To: skeeter
I love the way they make every sentence its own paragraph.
It looks like post-modernist poetry.
11
posted on
06/24/2004 8:34:13 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam Is As Islam Does)
To: Maceman
I think Myostatin hormone therapy will be the new vanity crazeThe bodybuilding community is always WAY ahead of everyone else. They have already been into looking for myostatin suppressing agents. As another poster has shown, they sell stuff that supposedly does this. Those guys will try ANYTHING to get a little bigger, or get a little more "cut". Heck, when I was lifting hard, I was lo-carbing it a decade ago. Now this low-carb thing seems like a silly fad (no, I am not a low-carb basher, it works, I just dont like this new found fascination with it, it bugs me, sheeple and all...)
12
posted on
06/24/2004 8:36:38 AM PDT
by
Paradox
(Occam was probably right.)
To: CSM
From the New England Journal of medicine, via the AP:
13
posted on
06/24/2004 8:38:12 AM PDT
by
The G Man
(John Kerry? America just can't afford a 9/10 President in a 9/11 world.)
To: presidio9
GDF-8 supression. This has been a know factor in cattle (Belgian Blue's) and has been proven in Mice.
Article implies that they already have a chemical compound that will knock out myostatin production.
Flex Wheeler and Ron Coleman also supposedly exhibit the "double muscling" phenomenon.
Bring it on. I'd love a short cut to get that big.
14
posted on
06/24/2004 8:38:50 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: Dead Corpse
15
posted on
06/24/2004 8:41:17 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
To: presidio9
It is unusual for a 4 year old to be able to lift 6.6 lbs?
16
posted on
06/24/2004 8:44:18 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: Phantom Lord
Where are you getting his age from?
17
posted on
06/24/2004 8:46:22 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Islam Is As Islam Does)
To: Physicist
Why Angus MacAskill was so tall is probably understood. Why he and a few other giants were so strong is more unique. Most giants are rather weak.
To: The G Man
19
posted on
06/24/2004 8:46:46 AM PDT
by
CSM
(Liberals may see Saddam's mass graves in Iraq as half-full, but I prefer to see them as half-empty.)
To: presidio9
Schuelke first examined the child, now four, as a new-born baby when his extraordinary muscle mass caused fears he might have a muscular problem. But the baby has developed into a healthy boy, normal apart from having muscles twice as big as normal which enable him to lift three kilo (6.6 lb) weights.
20
posted on
06/24/2004 8:48:02 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson