This is so cruel and inhumane. That any doctor would want to kill a beautiful infant is beyond me.
1 posted on
06/22/2004 5:45:15 PM PDT by
wagglebee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: wagglebee; NRA2BFree
2 posted on
06/22/2004 5:46:40 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: wagglebee
Amen. The doctors should test the injections on themselves first to make sure the stuff works properly.
3 posted on
06/22/2004 5:47:49 PM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all)
To: wagglebee
That any doctor would want to kill a beautiful infant is beyond me.
Very simple $$$$$$$$
4 posted on
06/22/2004 5:49:16 PM PDT by
WKB
(3!~ What we need is more "Christianity in politics" and less "Politics in Christianity")
To: wagglebee
It is really unfair on the nurses and the parents to see the baby making some sort of movement after birth. Yes, it is truly unfair. I mean, the parents and the medical professionals might feel bad or something. Better to stamp the life out of the kid before he comes out of the womb.
5 posted on
06/22/2004 5:49:32 PM PDT by
madprof98
To: wagglebee
Evil. It is evil.
6 posted on
06/22/2004 5:49:36 PM PDT by
Clara Lou
To: wagglebee
"What paediatricians do is spend resources keeping a baby that is going to die, alive. It is absolute nonsense. It does show that is up to us (obstetricians) to make sure the baby is not moving." Translation: "As a doctor, it is my job to kill children. Anyone who expects me to try to keep a child alive must be smoking crack."
8 posted on
06/22/2004 5:53:40 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column)
To: wagglebee
It is really unfair on the nurses and the parents to see the baby making some sort of movement after birth God no, we wouldn't want them to feel bad or anything. I mean, it's not like they should have to worry about what the baby is feeling while it's being "terminated" by a method that usually leads to 20 years of appeals by convicted murderers alleging that it's cruel and unusual punishment.
Heavens no, we wouldn't want the live adults to have to confront such vexing questions.
11 posted on
06/22/2004 5:55:25 PM PDT by
Regulator
(Totally Beyond Disgusting)
To: wagglebee
The babies are human...these doctors are SUB-human.
12 posted on
06/22/2004 5:55:32 PM PDT by
Ann Archy
(Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: wagglebee
HELLO!!!Does anyone else see the lunacy here?? Ain't killing 'em good enough..we must have more effective means. Ja Volt!
13 posted on
06/22/2004 5:56:13 PM PDT by
big'ol_freeper
("Freedom consists not in doing what we like, but in having the right to do what we ought."-Pope JPII)
To: wagglebee
Once it is born, you can't kill the baby but the law doesn't say anything about to what degree you resuscitate it So, they need a law to tell them to help someone stay alive?
Arrest every one of these SOBs and try them for murder.
15 posted on
06/22/2004 5:59:24 PM PDT by
Regulator
(This is even MORE disgusting!!)
To: wagglebee
He said injections that were supposed to end their lives in the womb failed to do so...The West's very own version of the 'Religion of Pieces'. We have nothing over the be-headers, do we?
On the face of it this can't really be true anyway - we have been told time and time again that there is nothing 'alive' in the womb to kill. Whatever it is that is being 'born', it can't be alive. Sick.
God help us all. God give the Church back Her spine and Her voice.
a_r
To: wagglebee
Professor Thornton, of City Hospital, Nottingham, said: "Once it is born, you can't kill the baby but the law doesn't say anything about to what degree you resuscitate it.I cannot even imagine that these are the words of someone in a civilized society.
20 posted on
06/22/2004 6:24:12 PM PDT by
Dolphy
To: wagglebee
"It was transferred ..... where it .... It is believed to have been adopted."
This baby is not an "IT"!!
Babies are "he" and "she."
Dehumanization is necessary - Proof that the author knows "it" is wrong.
21 posted on
06/22/2004 6:24:16 PM PDT by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US)
To: wagglebee
"
A baby with Downs Syndrome was to be aborted at a home hospital in the counties, but lived. It was transferred to St. George's Hospital where it received neonatal intensive care and survived. It is beleived to have been adopted."in the past babies were born alive after abortion more regularly, but people didn't make a fuss and pretended not to realise the baby was born alive"
"Once it is born , you can't kill the baby"
"The way it is dealt with, is by sensible doctors and nurses keeping it under their hat, and allowing the baby the baby to pass away peacefully"
Abortion is not murder.
It's a blob of tissue.
Abortion is not murder.
It's a blob of tissue.
Abortion is not murder.
It's a blob of tissue.
Abortion is not murder......
Just keep telling yourselves that Pro Choice movement.
23 posted on
06/22/2004 6:31:16 PM PDT by
fly_so_free
(Never underestimate the treachery of the democrat party- Save USA,-Vote a Dem out of office)
To: wagglebee
This should be easy to fix.
Inject the doctor.
To: wagglebee
"The way it is dealt with is by sensible doctors and sensible nurses keeping it under their hat and allowing the baby to pass away peacefully." Since when is it "sensible" to allow a baby to die? What bastards.
To: wagglebee
allowing the baby to pass away peacefully There's nothing peaceful about murder. And what is this "allowing" bs? That baby lived in spite of you and your evil. He/she deserves to live.
I always believed that people could justify their pro-abortion position up to the point when they had their own babies. After that, you either love babies, born and unborn, or you are a heartless, selfish and unloving person.
27 posted on
06/22/2004 6:45:16 PM PDT by
kdot
To: wagglebee
How dare these children fight to live and make the Mom , and nurses feel bad. As a mother and a nurse this sickens and insults me.
To: wagglebee
Professor Thornton, of City Hospital, Nottingham, said: "Once it is born, you can't kill the baby but the law doesn't say anything about to what degree you resuscitate it. "The way it is dealt with is by sensible doctors and sensible nurses keeping it under their hat and allowing the baby to pass away peacefully."
So much for it just being "tissue" and not a person. So much effort to deny a baby life.
Why doesn't the article address how much or little this complication affected the woman's life? After all, we are told that it is a woman's choice to murder her baby because pregnancy complicates her life.
One of the babies was adopted, how many of the mothers changed their minds and kept the children?
31 posted on
06/22/2004 6:58:44 PM PDT by
weegee
(Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them. ~~Ronald Reagan)
To: wagglebee
"It is really unfair on the nurses and the parents to see the baby making some sort of movement after birth."
I think they should send a video tape home with the parents. That way they can show it to all their friends who are considering an abortion to show that it is indeed a baby and not some inanimate grouping of cells.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson