Posted on 06/22/2004 6:56:15 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
Summary: The DreamWorks' animated film, "Shrek 2," is billed as harmless entertainment but contains subtle sexual messages.
Parents who are thinking about taking their children to see "Shrek 2", may wish to consider the following: The movie features a male-to-female transgender (in transition) as an evil bartender. The character has a five o'clock shadow, wears a dress and has female breasts. It is clear that he is a she-male. His voice is that of talk show host Larry King.
During a dance scene at the end of the movie, this transgendered man expresses sexual desire for Prince Charming, jumps on him, and both tumble to the floor.
In another scene in the movie, Shrek and Donkey need to be rescued from a dungeon where they are chained against the wall. The rescue is conducted by pinnochio who is asked to lie so his nose will grow long enough for one of the smaller cartoon characters to use it as a bridge to reach Shrek and Donkey. Donkey encourages him to lie about something and suggetsts he lie about wearing women's underwear. When he denies wearing women's underwear, his nose begins to grow.
An earlier scene in the movie features a wolf dressed in grandma's clothing and reading a book when Prince Charming encounters him. Later, one of the characters refers to the wolf's gender confusion.
TVC's report "A gender Identity Disorder Goes Mainstream" explains the transgender agenda and the effort to deconstruct the biological reality of male and female. DreamWorks is helping in this effort by promoting cross dressing and transgenderism in this animated film.
"Oh, get a life"
If I didn't have a life, which I do, and was looking for one, I would make sure that it didn't come close to mirroring anything that sucks like yours does.
If liberals consider Christians wackos, then crossdressers/transgenderists are totally insane, and need to be locked up.
God, you are one sick puppy.
You are using this thread to get off, I have no doubt about it after your last few posts.
"I pronounce it harmless as well"
Makes me wonder what you do consider harmful to kids.....
It wouldn't hurt for you to talk to Xenalyte and others on here, they seem to find nothing abhorrent, at least from what I have seen.
What is his/her fascination with men wearing women's underwear?
Amaxing how this one thread about Skrek2 has all of the sick-behavior(crossdressing)defenders rising to defend the honor of Shrek2.
Your chivalry is noted, stinkspur.
All the attacks wont stop me from posting what I feel I need to, so you might as well give it up, acting like I am obsessed with crossdressing and transgenders.
You defending these things, by your lack of saying anything negative concerning crossdressing/transgenderism, sure gives the impression that you are "into"(pun intended) crossdressing more than you care to admit.
"You've lost what tiny shred of credibility you ever had on this forum."
Like I give a rat's rump about what you have to say.
Anyway, you saying this doesn't matter a hill of beans, since you are the last person who can say anything about being credible.
Like you would be honest about what you have read concerning stinkspur.
Please keep posting stuff like that; you're making my case for me...........LOL.
I have NO clue, but I hope it doesn't have children!
No, I started this thread to comment on Shrek2, and to call attention to the crossdressing/transgender hints within it.
It is people like you who have turned this thread into personal attacks against me, and I have every right to defend myself.
As well, you seem to be getting off, not me, since no one is forcing you to post on this particular thread. I started the thread so I have to make rebuttals on it. So if you don't like the thread, buzz off. No one is forcing you to post on this thread.
Like they say, if you don't like what you see on a particular TV channel, change it.
Well....change to another thread.
BTW, you tell me that I need help?
You've got transgenderers/crossdressers in the world and I haven't noticed one comment of yours calling it sick behavior.
This leads me to believe that you don't consider it sick behavior, hence your attacks. If you don't consider those things to be sick behavior, then you have it all wrong...
...you need help, not me.
"Winnie the Pooh and the Hunny Tree" and "Winnie the Pooh and the Blustery Day" are about as harmless as they get. Unless you think Christopher Robin is gay. If you do, then do watch some Ninja Turtles or something.
Lord, someone else(you) trying to be cute, and failing miserably.
If you were on Jerry Springer, and Jerry Springer handed you the microphone near the end of the show, I am quite sure that after you made your comment to someone on the platform, you would be greeted with hails of "you suck", or "go to Oprah, go to Oprah"
Your very defensive, lfc. You're now lashing out at anyone who disagrees with you and labelling us all as "homosexual apologists."
I think this entire thread is ridiculous. It gives the Christian right a bad name, to have bible-thumping prigs like you finding fault with a popular kids' movie, and Pinocchio.
Are you one of those who scours Disney movies for anything that might look like a penis?
You're a very strange person. Do you know how few cross-dressers and transgenders there are? You act as if there's a rampant problem with men dressing up in women's clothes.
Maybe you hang with a different crowd than I do.
Regardless of one's attitudes about transgendered people, you have to laugh at this phrasing.
"Please keep posting stuff like that, you're making my case for me."
And your posts to me aren't making my case for me, as well?
Anyway, your opinion means nothing.
It means just as much as yours does.
I don't have the fascination. The losers in California who wnat to teach the worthless behavior of crossdressing/transgenderism are the ones who apparently are so fascianted with those behaviors that they feel the need to promote it.
Well, anyway, you made your statement. If you don't like the thread, then go somewhere else. No one is holding you here. So your staying might be construed as being fascinated with crossdressing.
All I want to do is bring to light what is going on in Shrek2.
Well, will you call crossdressing sick behavior?
Lack of doing so will be tantamount to you thinking that it isn't sick behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.