Posted on 06/17/2004 6:59:35 AM PDT by aculeus
One of Peter De Vries's comic novels has a character who accumulates Briticisms. As I recall, he orders shrimp cocktail as a "starter," refers to a friend "called" James (instead of "named" -- that's a subtle one), and fills his car with "petrol" for the ride home. Eventually, he winds up in hospital.
De Vries's conceit, delicious as it was, was an exaggeration. Generally a Yank can get away with at most one such locution in his or her active vocabulary, for example the person I know who likes to refer to his time "at university," the university in question being a large land-grant institution. Any more than that and he would be laughed out the door, like the professor who habitually shows up at faculty meetings in a bespoke suit, Turnbull and Asher shirt, and Liberty of London tie, done in a Windsor knot.
Lately, however, the American press has become that professor. What set the ball rolling, I believe, was use of the verb phrase "to go missing" to mean "disappear," as in a person or object that at one moment is available and visible and subsequently is nowhere to be found. "Disappear" doesn't perfectly convey this idea -- it has too much of a Siegfried and Roy, presto-chango connotation -- but, along with its slightly more melodramatic counterpart, "vanish," it had to do the job for a long time. "Go missing" is better, but it was resisted, probably for the very reason that it sounds so British. Along with variants "went missing" and "gone missing," it appeared in The New York Times not at all in 1983, and only twice in 1993.
In 2001, however, the formulation was employed 24 times. The reason was a major national story about a person who went missing: Chandra Levy. And that year was the tipping point. In 2003, the Times had precisely 50 "go missings," and today even writers for USA Today and People use it with a straight face.
A slightly different process was at work in the case of "sell-by date." That is the exact equivalent for what we call "expiration date," only with better rhythm, two fewer syllables, and a strong British feel. From 1980 through 1994, Times writers used it only four times, always in reference to spoiled food. But starting in 1995, "sell-by" began to be used metaphorically, to refer to a person or idea past its prime. For example, Elaine Showalter wrote in the Times last December, "Intellectuals and professors who write for a general audience are always valuable, but the idea of the 'public intellectual' as a specific role is now well past its sell-by date." That was one of eight metaphorical uses in the paper in 2003, compared with just two referring to foodstuffs. I would say that qualifies it as a cliché, and a fairly pretentious one at that.
Another phrase that started across the pond and is almost always used metaphorically is "at the end of the day," an equivalent of the American "when all is said and done." A couple of years of overuse sucked all the life out of it, and now no self-respecting American writer would perpetrate it. A LexisNexis search reveals that it's still quite popular in the U.K., however.
"Go missing," "sell-by date," and "end of the day" paved the way for the Briticisms of the moment -- "run-up" or "lead-up," meaning the period of time preceding a particular event. The length and awkwardness of my definition proves the utility of the compound nouns. But as with "go missing," their widespread adoption had to wait for a news story that needed them. Such an entry point has come in the last few months, with a batch of stories investigating happenings in Britain and the United States in the run-up to the Iraq war.
That has given writers the license to use the terms in virtually any context, and they have proved up to the task. On the same day recently, the Los Angeles Times referred to Bill Bradley's "run-up to the 2000 Democratic nomination fight," and USA Today predicted that The Passion of the Christ "should do well during the run-up to Easter."
I have noticed ever more recondite terms in the press. Janet Malcolm in The New Yorker recently talked about the time when Gertrude Stein "moved house" -- "move house" being an exact equivalent to the American "move," with the advantage of removing any possible ambiguity, being more emphatic, and sounding more British. In his review of Jayson Blair's recent book in the same magazine, Nicholas Lemann refers to "the bits we've all been waiting for." What a Yank would traditionally say is "the parts we've all been waiting for." (The online magazine Slate now has a regular feature called "The Juicy Bits.") Several weeks ago on National Public Radio, a correspondent described Roy Disney's assessment of the Walt Disney Corporation's profitable year: "not a renewable resource, just kind of a one-off based on some box-office hits." "One-off" is a very British noun meaning a one-time thing. I read a movie review last week in which a performance was referred to as "spot-on." Writing in the Times in March, Bryan Miller broke a barrier when he referred to coming across a "brilliant new map." The b-word had traditionally been used in the United States only in movie, book, and other arts reviews as a hackneyed alternative to "really, really good." In Britain, it's an all-purpose adjective for anything you like a lot.
It's hard to pinpoint the cause of the use of all these Briticisms. Anglophilia hardly seems to be rampant at the moment. Perhaps the success of BBC America is a factor, or maybe the importation of British editors like Tina Brown and Anna Wintour a decade ago is finally trickling down. But I wouldn't underestimate the eternal appeal of sounding classy without seeming pretentious. The gathering storm of Briticisms would seem to provide a perfect opportunity.
At this point, the trend is moving beyond journalism, and to terms that (unlike "go missing" and "run-up") have perfectly good American counterparts. In his campaign for governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger talked about having "a" (not "some" or "a cup of") coffee. A visiting friend of mine talked of "booking" (not reserving) a hotel room. David Letterman recently made fun of Oprah Winfrey's saying that she couldn't appear on his show because she was "on holiday" -- what was wrong, he wondered, with "vacation"? A friend has taken to saying, "I'll ring you" instead of "phone you" or "call you up." From various sources, I have heard repeated uses of "sack" (fire), "row" (argument), and "chat up" (talk to, usually in a flirtatious way). Briticisms all: Together they constitute a cultural equivalent of De Vries's poseur.
I'm afraid I can't resist the inevitable conclusion, so here goes: Briticisms have passed their sell-by date, and the odor (or should I say odour) is getting a bit rank.
Ben Yagoda is a professor of journalism at the University of Delaware and the author, most recently, of The Sound on the Page: Style and Voice in Writing, published this month by HarperCollins.
Hear, hear!
The phrase "gone missing" is alive and well in The South in the form of "turned up missing"............
Pish-tosh, what a load of old rubbish.
Since when has "bits" been an Englishism? I've always heard phrases like "this is the good bit".
Mind the gap!
I spent so much of my early life around people who spoke 'Commonweath' English, that a lot of 'Briticisms' are hard-wired into my vocabulary. Apart from that, I have nothing that a fellow American would recognise as a foreign accent. I spell words in the American way, 'color', 'odor', 'favorite', but say 'nye-ther', rather than 'nee-ther'.
It's hard not to slip into using that stuff if one reads several Brit novels in a row.
That being said, at the end of the day, there are many more Americanisms. We just don't notice them. Don't go there.
Have at it!
Very funny article. I, too, have noticed this swing towards Briticisms lately. It was most notable when Chandra Levy "went missing."
I had a dear friend who would say "well, we'll just have to see what Doctor says." It drove me crazy. One time I even went off on her over it. I said "he's THE Doctor, not just Doctor. There ARE others in town; he's not God." (Which, of course is what "Doctor" would have you believe.) It's related to that "in university" and "in hospital" thing, and it makes me nuts. If my friend had been British it wouldn't have bothered me at all. It was just an affectation that SHE thought sounded upper-crust.
Winston Churchill fell in love with "No comment" which he first heard used by some small town American sheriff.
Recently I read "Arm candy" in one of the Brit papers.
Linguistic influences work both ways.
Nice touch.
The word "hottie" is also a Britishism, I believe.
My maternal grandmother used to omit the "the" before surnames, as in "We played bridge at Smiths' last night." Since one does not correct one's elders, all I could do was grit my teeth and send "THE Smiths'" brainwaves at her.
Lets see them use chaps as something besides western wear, and then there is bloody. I'm not even going there.
I noticed it earlier -- when John Kennedy's plane "went missing".
When 'cussin Bubba says "moved house", he meant he jacked it up and aired up the tires and physically relocated his abode.
Whereas we would say, "the team is doing well," the Briticism would be, "the team are doing well."
We should just eliminate everything from our language that has British origins...
My favorite Americanism:
All y'all want a coke? What flavor? Pepsi, root beer, sprite, mountain dew?
One of my minor pastimes is catching Briticisms (why aren't they called Britishisms?) in UK-made films with "American" scenes.
A "New York" snack bar in "In America" displays a neon sign reading "Sandwiches to Take Away". [Clunk!]
In "With Eyes Wide Shut" made by an American director (you know, whatshisname) who lived in the UK too long a headline in "The New York Post" reads "Woman Dies of Drugs Overdose" [Clunk!]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.