Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Museum looks to cover up words like 'bloodthirsty savages' (PC garbage alert!)
Seacoastonline.com ^ | June 13, 2004 | Trudy Tynan

Posted on 06/14/2004 5:59:40 PM PDT by Jimmyclyde

By Trudy Tynan Associated Press Writer

DEERFIELD, Mass. - No one argues that they reflect one side's view _ etched in stone _ of a 300-year-old war fought when this western Massachusetts community was the frontier.

Proud descendants of Deerfield's white settlers erected historical markers by the dozens here back in the days when the battleground with Indian tribes had shifted west to the Black Hills of South Dakota.

But now, some say, the markers have become a modern embarrassment in this museum village that for centuries has been consumed with preserving history.

So, in an exhibit, unabashedly called "Covering Up History," historians have hung removable banners over some of the marble plaques in Memorial Hall Museum commemorating the attacks on Deerfield during the French and Indian Wars. Visitors are invited to comment on the rewrite.

The aim is to drape the rhetoric of the 1870s and 1880s, when the museum was established, with a more modern version of events in the late 1600s and early 1700s that no longer denigrates one-time foes.

"It was hard for me and other members of the staff to rationalize the words. Phrases like 'bloodthirsty savages' are hurtful to people," said Suzanne Flynt, a curator at the museum operated by the Pocumtuck Valley Historical Society.

Visitors can still lift the banners to view original inscriptions, such as "Mary Field, adopted by an Indian. Was named WALAHOWEY. She married a savage and became one."

The covering version reads: "Mary, adopted by a Kanien'kehaka (Mohawk). Was named WALAHOWEY (WELAHAWI). She married a Kanien'kehaka and adopted the culture, customs and language of her new community in Kahanawake."

Mary was 6 when a combined force of Mohawks, Hurons, Abenakis and French Canadians attacked Deerfield in 1704 killing 50 residents and marching more than 100 others, nearly half of them children, off to captivity in Quebec.

While most of the captured children were eventually returned, some, mostly girls, refused to leave the matrilineal Mohawk society, where they had more rights than the Puritan colony offered women. A few others converted to Catholicism and built a new life in French Canada. The first archbishop of Quebec was a grandson of one of the Deerfield captives.

"History is written by the victors," Robert Jones, a retired Navy commander and carrier pilot said Friday as he lifted the banners to read the original inscriptions.

Jones, of North Conway, N.H., wearing a cap from the carrier USS America, said he and his wife now travel the nation in their recreational vehicle visiting museums.

The written comments left by other visitors were divided, but most said they hoped the museum would keep both interpretations of history.

"We need to realize they (interpretations of history) will change again," wrote Kathy Krup of Chippewa Heights, Ill.

The fate of the outdoor memorials marking skirmishes and battles poses a more difficult problem, Flynt said.

"The question has long been what do we do," Flynt said. "Our organization put them up. And some are just granite boulders."

One proposal is to move all the offending historical markers into a sort of graveyard of political incorrectness by the museum. The historical association is also considering installing competing signs alongside the old markers. But that, Flynt says, would cost thousands of dollars.

Chiseling out the offending language or removing the markers has been ruled out, she said. "We don't want to do anything irreversible."

Monique Fordham, director of Friends of Wissatinnewag, an advocacy group named for the site of a nearby native village where more than 300 women, children and elderly were slaughtered by colonial militia in 1676, called the exhibit "a good first step."

"Finally, they did something," she said.

Her group had complained years ago about the markers, including one that praises "the patriotism and bravery" of the soldiers involved in the attack on the noncombatants.

She would prefer to see new markers erected alongside the old.

"Our organization believes in teachable moments," Fordham said. "And that would create an opportunity for some lessons."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: museum; pc; rewrittinghistory
The written comments left by other visitors were divided, but most said they hoped the museum would keep both interpretations of history.

Yes I like this idea. Let's get the Nazi interpretations of WWII or their interpretations of say the "summer camps of joy and fun" known to us in our interpretation as the death camps.

What a joke.

1 posted on 06/14/2004 5:59:40 PM PDT by Jimmyclyde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

bump


2 posted on 06/14/2004 5:59:59 PM PDT by Jimmyclyde (Dying ain't much of a living boy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

Down the memory hole....


3 posted on 06/14/2004 6:08:24 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

Next....they will probably cover up this offensive quote on the Deerfield "Civil War Monument which stands on the Old Meetinghouse Hill which is within the limits of the Old Fort built A.D. 1689 and which remained until A.D. 1758. And which was one of the chief defences of the early settlers against the attacks of the savage indians."

"Aye call it holy ground
The spot where first they trod!
They have left unstained what here they found
Freedom to worship God."


4 posted on 06/14/2004 6:08:34 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
"On the night of May 13, a group of warriors raided Hatfield and made off with cattle, driving them up to the campsite by the falls. The settlers were determined to recover their cattle. Word was sent out: who wants to join a force against the tribes at Peskeompscut. Local inhabitants, some from as far south as Springfield, and a few garrison soldiers responded to the call. By May 18, 150 men and boys assembled in Hatfield. Captain William Turner led the group past Bloody Brook and the edge of Deerfield, where they crossed the Deerfield River. Then they wound through about 2 miles of unbroken forest, crossed the Green River, and then pushed on to Mount Adams which was within a mile of the falls."
5 posted on 06/14/2004 6:09:26 PM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

I had a colleague at NYU, since dead, who wrote in a book review that his ancestry was part Indian and that in his opinion American Indians often behaved with excessive cruelty. Torture was a regular part of their culture.

There was much to admire about the Indians, too. But the bad has to be taken with the good. Rewriting history to make loonie PCs feel more comfortable isn't the way to deal with the problems of the past.


6 posted on 06/14/2004 6:13:32 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
"Aye call it holy ground The spot where first they trod! They have left unstained what here they found Freedom to worship God."

Clearly hate speech. Consider yourself warned!

7 posted on 06/14/2004 6:15:08 PM PDT by Jimmyclyde (Dying ain't much of a living boy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Phrases like 'bloodthirsty savages' are hurtful to people," said Suzanne Flynt

What a load of crap!

'Hurtful' is another word like 'diversity' that I'm sick and tired of hearing. 'Hurtful' is when the 'bloodthirsty savages' put your feet in the fire or when the 'settlers' bus' a cap in yo' ass!

The feminization and wussification of America continues.

8 posted on 06/14/2004 6:21:35 PM PDT by Looking4Truth ((Muslim internment camps in the U.S. NOW!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Human sacrifice and cannibalism were also known among the savages that inhabited early
America....

That was simply the way it was....for a while we made it better....seems to be returning to the depravity that once was...

So whose the savages now...?


9 posted on 06/14/2004 6:24:26 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

My husband & I visited Old Deerfield Village last Fall.
I asked about that quote on Civil War Monument at the History Museum.

None of the reference librarians knew the source. I suggested they do a 'google' search on the quote and we found the author, an Irish Poetess Felicia Hemans.

It's from her "Pilgrim Poem" which was so popular at the time the monument was erected that no one thought to give her any credit.

Aparently everyone in Deerfield could recite her poem.

My, my.... how the times have changed.


10 posted on 06/14/2004 6:35:04 PM PDT by JulieRNR21 (One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde

If they really wanted to be hurtful...

"Mary decided to stay in their heathen and backward culture that had yet to even invent the wheel by the time the colonist settled the land."


11 posted on 06/14/2004 7:06:00 PM PDT by pdlglm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
If people ever read the Declaration of Independence past the first two sentences, they might be upset at the part about "the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes, and Conditions."

Upset, that is, at Jefferson's wording, not at the incidents which provoked his language.

12 posted on 06/14/2004 7:07:50 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
Do you know that the monument to those slain by INDIAN SAVAGES on the square in Santa Fe,NM has the word savages chiseled out?

The word "Selvege" originally meant "dwellers of the green forest". It was only after the shear brutality of Indian warfare that the term took on a new meaning.

"He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers the merciless INDIAN SAVAGES, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions."
Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776
13 posted on 06/14/2004 7:14:01 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (DEMS STILL LIE like yellow dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pdlglm
Mary decided to stay in their heathen and backward culture that had yet to even invent the wheel by the time the colonist settled the land.

...and was dead by age 30.

14 posted on 06/14/2004 7:39:03 PM PDT by Jimmyclyde (Dying ain't much of a living boy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jimmyclyde
"It was hard for me and other members of the staff to rationalize the words. Phrases like 'bloodthirsty savages' are hurtful to people..."

How about this rationalization: "These words were written over 120 years ago. People thought differently than they do now."

If the museum curator is too stupid to understand this simple but powerful fact of history then she needs to find a new job.

15 posted on 06/14/2004 8:32:41 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson